here is a gallery of mine: http://shakta.deepfree.com/pv040207/
please tell me what do you think.
thanks
please tell me what do you think.
thanks
-
-
Simple, but nice.
-
looks pretty good'Comment
-
yeah i would agree there its nice and simple.. maybe to many pix tho.. (but thats just my opinion)Comment
-
Looks nice
Comment
-
Nice header, but I'm not pushed to click to visit the site
Comment
-
-
you're not, but hopefully others willOriginally posted by sexsup
Nice header, but I'm not pushed to click to visit the site
Comment
-
get a domainPremium Web DesignComment
-
goodComment
-
Only thing I'd change is hosting.<B><A HREF="http://www.webair.com/cgi-bin/in?136">Webair</A> - Virtual hosting from $9.95, dedicated from $119, complete paysite sollutions, reseller program. Most stable host ever!Comment
-
i have lots of domains .. i am submitting to those tgps i dont know the income/bandwidth potential from a free host now. but perhaps i am too careful ...
btw i a have put a domain on that deepfree account, but they messed something up, and not replying to mails i send them.Comment
-
signed up with webair starter plan ... it's not that ten bucks that counts
Comment
-
-
Very nice.
I like many pics.SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.Comment
-
The design looks pretty good.
Page load times are pretty slow. We tend to forget that the majority of households are still on dial-up.
You can speed things up by getting rid of some of the thumbs. If you haven't sold a surfer by the time they see 15-16 thumbs adding more probally isn't going to help. It will just increase the number of visitor who get board waiting for the page to load and hit the back button.
I would recomend removing thumbs 17 through 20. These thumbs are the most hardcore ones. Removing them will not only make the page load faster but increase the tease factor.
Also your thumbs themselves are a bit large filesize wise. Ranging 6K to 11K. You should be able to reduce them down 4-7K without reducing image quality.
Even as it is right now it'll probally do well given enough traffic.
Becareful trying to use a starter virtual host. If I remeber right their starter plan only includes 25 gigs of bandwidth and charges $1 per gig on overages.
With the size of that gallery you will most likely burn 200-250K per unique vistor. You'll burn through that 25 gigs pretty fast.
Just keep an eye on your stats and be ready to upgrade to a larger plan on short notice.
Good LuckComment
-
Originally posted by Gel
The design looks pretty good.
Page load times are pretty slow. We tend to forget that the majority of households are still on dial-up.
You can speed things up by getting rid of some of the thumbs. If you haven't sold a surfer by the time they see 15-16 thumbs adding more probally isn't going to help. It will just increase the number of visitor who get board waiting for the page to load and hit the back button.
I would recomend removing thumbs 17 through 20. These thumbs are the most hardcore ones. Removing them will not only make the page load faster but increase the tease factor.
Also your thumbs themselves are a bit large filesize wise. Ranging 6K to 11K. You should be able to reduce them down 4-7K without reducing image quality.
Even as it is right now it'll probally do well given enough traffic.
Becareful trying to use a starter virtual host. If I remeber right their starter plan only includes 25 gigs of bandwidth and charges $1 per gig on overages.
With the size of that gallery you will most likely burn 200-250K per unique vistor. You'll burn through that 25 gigs pretty fast.
Just keep an eye on your stats and be ready to upgrade to a larger plan on short notice.
Good Luck
thanks ! pretty valuable help you gave me !
do you think i should take thumbs size smaller too? (not kb but pixels)
whats the best program to save quality jpegs with good filesize? (currently i ue photoshop's web export with quality=60)Last edited by shakta; 02-10-2004, 03:45 PM.Comment
-
-
Don't forget to optimize for search engines. Add keyword and description meta tags, and use your image ALT tags to match up with your meta tag key words.
Search engines are your friends!
Use this http://www.widexl.com/remote/search-...-analyzer.html to prepare your search engine spider food
Comment
-
niceComment
-
looks good!Comment
-
if you need one more....very nice.Comment
-
not bad
icq: 327189899Comment
-
not badComment
-
I would leave the thumb size the same.Originally posted by shakta
thanks ! pretty valuable help you gave me !
do you think i should take thumbs size smaller too? (not kb but pixels)
whats the best program to save quality jpegs with good filesize? (currently i ue photoshop's web export with quality=60)
I personally use East Thumbnailer from fookes.com to make my thumbs.
It does a good job and is free.Comment
-
Originally posted by fusionx
Don't forget to optimize for search engines. Add keyword and description meta tags, and use your image ALT tags to match up with your meta tag key words.
Search engines are your friends!
Use this http://www.widexl.com/remote/search-...-analyzer.html to prepare your search engine spider food
thanks for the link !
really nice tool. I was using AddWeb Pro until now for my new galleries, but its keywprd analyzer is over complicated.
widexl rocks !Comment
-
Nice, but may have too many pics.Comment
-
Looks nice man...and those are good high quality pics too!
Comment
-
Chick is hot thoOriginally posted by sexsup
Nice header, but I'm not pushed to click to visit the site
ForcedMen | AsianViolation | WorkMyCock | TickleAsian | MasturbationInstructors | AssCleaners | TickleTorment | Fetish4Download (VOD) | PantyhosePlaza | FemaleDomination
mick[at]fetishassets.com | ICQ: 395-117Comment
-
thanks for the nice comments
thumbnails have been optimized, only 16 pics now, and more compressed.
Comment
-
ya looks nice. and I pushed the trigger...nice teasing pageICQ # 316936927Comment
-
trueOriginally posted by SLAiN787
Simple, but nice.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shakta
thanks ! pretty valuable help you gave me !
do you think i should take thumbs size smaller too? (not kb but pixels)
whats the best program to save quality jpegs with good filesize? (currently i ue photoshop's web export with quality=60)
Try this program:
http://www.ulead.com/ssp/runme.htm
...it is like magic.
SpoinkComment
Comment