|
The original argument really is simply flawed on so many levels. I love Nirvana. I listen to a huge variety of music including a lot of beatles stuff but would still generally prefer to listen to Nivvana when in the mood. However to claim Nirvana has had a stronger 'impact' on music is at best very uneducated.
Do a little research on the subject. Few if any bands can even come close to the Beatles 'impact' on popular music. Certainly not Nirvana. The influence of the beatles was enormous and remains so to this day.
Oh - and nirvana aren't punk. There were also a lot of true punk bands pre-nirvana that had a very big influence. I'm guessing from your post that you're not very old. As I say go off and do some research and don't jump to wild conclusions based on your own tastes and maybe you'll see a much bigger picture, and in the process come to appreciate some superb bands from back in the day.
__________________
Ignorance is never bliss.
|