09-14-2004, 01:25 PM
|
|
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 471
|
Quote:
Originally posted by NickPapageorgio
It's not whether or not teens had to have parental supervision or not, it's about the inappropriateness of much of the information. Quoted from past versions of your site:
An Article Header
"Let Teenagers Have Sex!
Should teenagers be allowed to have sex. This essay discusses the reasons why teenagers should be allowed to have sex. You will be surprised but Dad@ says - Yes! Every Parent should read then print and give this to their teens."
A write up on one version which was not preceeded by any warning to teens or parents. Which by the way had links to a female ejaculation video.
"he dictionary defines intercourse as "social discussion" AND "sexual copulation."
When you are done reading the true sex stories, essays, studying the graphics, and watching the free sexual position videos, you will have an advanced understanding of sex and sexuality that sadly most will never have.
This sexual intercourse will be evil and miraculous, ugly and beautiful (11mb .mpg) disturbing and erotic.
So when you are done surfing those other sites, and reading their politically and religiously correct answers you enter this website to become a sexually advanced adult.
However - please, before you judge whether this website is pornographic or not, understand that it is only pornographic to you, if YOU don't want to see a male with one testicle, or a curved penis, or forceful ejaculation, or real female ejaculation, or a video of clitoris piercing (8.1mg .avi) or perhaps circumcision.
But the male with one testicle - he wants the real truth about penis enlargement.
The female that has never orgasmed - she needs to learn.
The male who premature ejaculates - wants to watch the sexual technique videos.
And you don't have to wait 36 years learn - like it took me. : )
Nor should you.
[email protected]
ICQ 32315652" <-- Especially concerning considering this little write up was aimed at young teens. Btw, the header of this page said, "Mom and Dad never had intercourse like this"
I mean these are just a couple of the "Red lights" that go off for me as a parent. Not to mention that at the bottom of many of the old pages are banners for "Sex toy stores" or "Adult oriented personals" and such. These types of banners could lead kids straight to porn so that argument is out of the question. Like I said, I will go with my instincts on this one. You may not even realize that the content sends up red flags to parents but I know there is no way in hell my kid would ever be browsing images and videos of female ejaculation with me. Maybe that's cool in your house but it's not here and I think probably not kosher in most homes. Atleast none that I have ever known of. Like I said, I don't know what your motives are or what it is that is going on with that site, but something isn't right. That is just my personal view ofcourse and should not reflect anything other than my view.
|
holy cow that's messed up man...
well said
 |
|
|