Quote:
Originally posted by tigermtb
Simply put, p1mpdogg doesn't know what he's talking about.
His statement about all 'non nude teen sites' is wildly generalized and for the most part, does not reflect reality.
We all know what he means... he's talking about the sites that sexualize ACTUAL underage girls... and we've probably all seen them at one point or another. These sites should be shut down because they are immoral and border on being illegal. For the most part, new policies and laws are making it more and more difficult for these sites to operate.
Obviously, very little brain power was put into his initial post, which lead to the major generalization of an entire niche. Now all he can do is sit and flame people because he's simply wrong and has no other option other than admitting he was wrong -- which apparently he won't do.
Fact: the majority of the non nude niche is legal, and 18+
I don't think there is anything else to say. You guys are basically arguing over the interpretation of what he meant by "non nude teen sites"
|
you confuse me, too much text... must drink more...
im wrong in my post?
so 14-17 yr old dressed up posed in sexy positions is cool with you?
thats what i am getting out of your statement