Beating 2257 ? - List all your websites as educational technique website? - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

sexeducation

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 7315
Share

Post
#1

Beating 2257 ? - List all your websites as educational technique website?

09-03-2004, 04:09 PM

It appears by FSC that this new version of 2257 is worse then Acacia's crap of wanting to know all your customers.

Just brain storming (and chatting) ...
list all your websites as "educational" regarding the niche you promote????
Tags: None
freeadultcontent

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 9976
Share

Post
#2

09-03-2004, 04:11 PM

give me your damn login and password.

Exclusive Ethnic & Microniche Sites
Comment
robfantasy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 6445
Share

Post
#3

09-03-2004, 04:12 PM

Originally posted by sexeducation
It appears by FSC that this new version of 2257 is worse then Acacia's crap of wanting to know all your customers.

Just brain storming (and chatting) ...
list all your websites as "educational" regarding the niche you promote????

can you explain ... what is your solution

Looking to speak w/ high volume nutra CPA affiliates or networks... msg me
Comment
freeadultcontent

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 9976
Share

Post
#4

09-03-2004, 04:15 PM

Originally posted by robfantasy
can you explain ... what is your solution

He is babling about the excemption for real educational sites and such. Same thing that is in the Miller ruling.

Ignore him. BTW he does not live up to agreements.

Exclusive Ethnic & Microniche Sites
Comment
sexeducation

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 7315
Share

Post
#5

09-03-2004, 04:21 PM

Originally posted by robfantasy
can you explain ... what is your solution

"It's NOT sexually explicit material" ..."It's sex technique educational video" ???

I don't have an answer.
I am trying to push some buttons and get people thinking on how to bring this obviously free speed issue - mainstream.

I can brain storm online.
Won't hurt my rep ...roflmao
Comment
FreeHugeMovies

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Dec 2001

Posts: 14141
Share

Post
#6

09-03-2004, 04:24 PM

This will never go into effect. Why all the drama over 2257?
Comment
freeadultcontent

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 9976
Share

Post
#7

09-03-2004, 04:26 PM

Originally posted by FreeHugeMovies
This will never go into effect. Why all the drama over 2257?

It will go into effect. There is one in effect now too.
That is not the, ahh never mind I feel dirty in this thread. I will make a new one.

Exclusive Ethnic & Microniche Sites
Comment
AaronM

GFY Royality ;)

Join Date: Oct 2001

Posts: 46917
Share

Post
#8

09-03-2004, 04:26 PM

2257 is in place for a good reason. It may have some flaws but very few things in this world are perfect. I see no reason to "beat" something that is very reasonable and so easy to comply with.
Comment
AaronM

GFY Royality ;)

Join Date: Oct 2001

Posts: 46917
Share

Post
#9

09-03-2004, 04:27 PM

Originally posted by FreeHugeMovies
This will never go into effect. Why all the drama over 2257?

Huh?

No offense but I always thought that you were more intelligent than to make a comment like this.
Comment
LadyMischief

Orgasms N Such!

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 18135
Share

Post
#10

09-03-2004, 04:28 PM

Originally posted by AaronM
2257 is in place for a good reason. It may have some flaws but very few things in this world are perfect. I see no reason to "beat" something that is very reasonable and so easy to comply with.

No point talking sense to this psycho, man... But I do agree with what you say... 2257 isn't a hard thing to comply with as long as you're organized and have good relatinoships with your content providers/sponsors. People trying to dodge it are only going to fuck it up for everyone else.

ICQ 3522039
Content Manager - orgasm.com
[email protected]
Comment
sexeducation

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 7315
Share

Post
#11

09-03-2004, 04:28 PM

Originally posted by AaronM
2257 is in place for a good reason. It may have some flaws but very few things in this world are perfect. I see no reason to "beat" something that is very reasonable and so easy to comply with.

Well that means that Adult.com will have to send me the original model documents for the three sexually explicit graphics on SexEducation.com - correct?
Comment
LadyMischief

Orgasms N Such!

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 18135
Share

Post
#12

09-03-2004, 04:30 PM

Originally posted by sexeducation
Well that means that Adult.com will have to send me the original model documents for the three sexually explicit graphics on SexEducation.com - correct?

Choke and die you fucking retard.. you already admitted you couldn't afford a lawyer before, you have no place in any kind of discussion related to a business you have nothing to do with, except to make it harder for real businesspeople to do business.

ICQ 3522039
Content Manager - orgasm.com
[email protected]
Comment
robfantasy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 6445
Share

Post
#13

09-03-2004, 04:32 PM

isnt there a privacy issue at stake.. you can just freely distribute ppls info all over the place w/out their consent. ? like to every shmoe who signs up to promote a program?

Looking to speak w/ high volume nutra CPA affiliates or networks... msg me
Comment
sexeducation

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 7315
Share

Post
#14

09-03-2004, 04:32 PM

Originally posted by sexeducation
Well that means that Adult.com will have to send me the original model documents for the three sexually explicit graphics on SexEducation.com - correct?

Answer the question.

Does the new 2257 changes mean that Adult.com must send me the original model documents so that I must keep them on file?

YES or NO ...????
Comment
freeadultcontent

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 9976
Share

Post
#15

09-03-2004, 04:32 PM

everyone but sex ed (thread jack) http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...adid=351462&s=

Exclusive Ethnic & Microniche Sites
Comment
sexeducation

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 7315
Share

Post
#16

09-03-2004, 04:34 PM

Originally posted by robfantasy
isnt there a privacy issue at stake.. you can just freely distribute ppls info all over the place w/out their consent. ? like to every shmoe who signs up to promote a program?

It's exactly a privacy issue.
And that's why the NEW 2257 must be defeated.

SexEducation.com will remain 100% anonymous.
Always has - alwasy will.
Comment
sexeducation

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 7315
Share

Post
#17

09-03-2004, 04:43 PM

Actually ...
So far in our discussion ...

I like this angle the best.

It's not a "porn site" it's a "sex educaction technique" website primarily using graphics and video.
You will NOT find pornography on this website but you will find a COMMUNITY that shows by various multimedia sources how to have [fill in niche] sex.

Are we not allowed to teach sex anymore?
Comment
AaronM

GFY Royality ;)

Join Date: Oct 2001

Posts: 46917
Share

Post
#18

09-03-2004, 04:55 PM

Originally posted by sexeducation
Well that means that Adult.com will have to send me the original model documents for the three sexually explicit graphics on SexEducation.com - correct?

No. Completely incorrect.

If you are going to post about this law...You may want to know it a bit better.
Comment
AaronM

GFY Royality ;)

Join Date: Oct 2001

Posts: 46917
Share

Post
#19

09-03-2004, 04:56 PM

Originally posted by sexeducation
Answer the question.

Does the new 2257 changes mean that Adult.com must send me the original model documents so that I must keep them on file?

YES or NO ...????

No.

Section 75.2 paragraph D.
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...