He is bumbling through answering questions.
Watching Bush on CNN is painful.
Collapse
X
-
Watching Bush on CNN is painful.
Tags: None -
His tactic is pretty ingenious though, he just doesn't answer them.
I thought it was fairly inappropriate to ask about O'Neil at the press conference, and even more futile since any idiot could have told you he wouldn't address it.
- Titus -
-
CATOriginally posted by ytcracker
shaquille onealComment
-
He always mumble and repeat the same thing over and over again... even if it has nothing to do with the question:
- The tyrant is gone
- no more rape rooms ( btw, anybody has a pic, I need for a project..)
- The world is a safer place ( funny, it doesn't seem so: Orange,yellow,red,green)
- The world is more peacefull without Saddam...( Peacefull??? funny, I tought their was a war going on ..)
I just hope our "non-elected" prime- minister don't fuck us up to please an "un-elected" president...
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
Change the president...Originally posted by Nikoleta
just change the channel
much better
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
Its like watching an accident happen. You can't help but to watch.Originally posted by Nikoleta
just change the channel
-uno
icq: 111-914
CrazyBabe.com - porn art
MojoHost - For all your hosting needs, present and future. Tell them I sent ya!Comment
-
I wanted to see him in a heated debate with one of his opponents..
No doubt they'd ask him to explain all of his lies... That would be fun to watch..
Comment
-
thats what you want, but it wont happen. He is cool as a cucumber. While dean will be getting all red faced like a whiny bitch, he will just have that little grin as if to say you fuckin douche bag. He rules.Ever notice that pretty much everything added to the Constitution after the original was a mistake.Comment
-
Scared, navie, dumb, pick oneOriginally posted by Sp1nal
USA residents keep silence?
It IS what it ISComment
-
Some are starting to talk ( but you have to be carefull: Anti-Bush = USA hater = traitor)...Originally posted by Sp1nal
USA residents keep silence?
What is noticeable is the silence of those that honestly beleived their president as saying the truth... They realize but cannot admit they have been fooled....Study Published by Army Criticizes War on Terror's Scope
By Thomas E. Ricks
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, January 12, 2004; Page A12
A scathing new report published by the Army War College broadly criticizes the Bush administration's handling of the war on terrorism, accusing it of taking a detour into an "unnecessary" war in Iraq and pursuing an "unrealistic" quest against terrorism that may lead to U.S. wars with states that pose no serious threat.
...
"[T]he global war on terrorism as currently defined and waged is dangerously indiscriminate and ambitious, and accordingly . . . its parameters should be readjusted," Record writes. Currently, he adds, the anti-terrorism campaign "is strategically unfocused, promises more than it can deliver, and threatens to dissipate U.S. military resources in an endless and hopeless search for absolute security."
Record, a veteran defense specialist and author of six books on military strategy and related issues, was an aide to then-Sen. Sam Nunn when the Georgia Democrat was chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Jan11.htmlI know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
I happen to think Bush is a fucking idiot but listening to foreigners bitch about America on gfy is an every day thing so why do you expect rebuttals every time theres a thread saying just about the same thing that was talked about two days ago?
That being said I hope he loses his reelection bid.Comment
-
Hmm...and what "truth" are you referring to?Originally posted by directfiesta
What is noticeable is the silence of those that honestly beleived their president as saying the truth... They realize but cannot admit they have been fooled....When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
pleaaaaase.... I am not interesting in " playing" with you.Originally posted by theking
Hmm...and what "truth" are you referring to?
Get a clue.I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
Originally posted by directfiesta
Change the president...
much better
WE BUILD YOUR NICHE TGP!! 1 SPOT OPEN! ICQ 211286670
TRANNY WEBMASTERS, trades, traffic, spots, galleries, TGP building
SHEMALE DOME NEW PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM!! New Fresh HOSTED GALLERIESComment
-
Misleading information. This is not the official position of the War College but was an article written by Record who was visiting the War College.Originally posted by directfiesta
Some are starting to talk ( but you have to be carefull: Anti-Bush = USA hater = traitor)...
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Study Published by Army Criticizes War on Terror's Scope
By Thomas E. Ricks
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, January 12, 2004; Page A12
A scathing new report published by the Army War College broadly criticizes the Bush administration's handling of the war on terrorism, accusing it of taking a detour into an "unnecessary" war in Iraq and pursuing an "unrealistic" quest against terrorism that may lead to U.S. wars with states that pose no serious threat.
...
"[T]he global war on terrorism as currently defined and waged is dangerously indiscriminate and ambitious, and accordingly . . . its parameters should be readjusted," Record writes. Currently, he adds, the anti-terrorism campaign "is strategically unfocused, promises more than it can deliver, and threatens to dissipate U.S. military resources in an endless and hopeless search for absolute security."
Record, a veteran defense specialist and author of six books on military strategy and related issues, was an aide to then-Sen. Sam Nunn when the Georgia Democrat was chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...-2004Jan11.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last edited by theking; 01-13-2004, 02:28 PM.When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
It's not misleading at all.Originally posted by theking
Misleading information. This is not the official position of the War College but was an article written by Record who was visiting the War College.Comment
-
I disagree by 180...as the Washington Post article was designed to give the impression that the Military's own War College is in agreement with the article that was written by Record...and it is not. The article written by Record is one man's opinion just as is your opinion. The article by the Washington Post...is very misleading in my opinion.Originally posted by sacX
It's not misleading at all.When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
well it clearly says who it was written by, who he was.. It mentions standard disclaimers. The fact is, it *was* published by the War College. He's a professor (albeit visiting) at the war college. What's misleading about that?Originally posted by theking
I disagree by 180...as the Washington Post article was designed to give the impression that the Military's own War College is in agreement with the article that was written by Record...and it is not. The article written by Record is one man's opinion just as is your opinion. The article by the Washington Post...is very misleading in my opinion.Comment
-
It isn't...I somehow managed to miss this paragraph...Originally posted by sacX
well it clearly says who it was written by, who he was.. It mentions standard disclaimers. The fact is, it *was* published by the War College. He's a professor (albeit visiting) at the war college. What's misleading about that?
His essay, published by the Army War College's Strategic Studies Institute, carries the standard disclaimer that its views are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Army, the Pentagon or the U.S. government.When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment


Comment