kmanrox:
Quote:
|
you could probably make a novel with the pictures of the people who died at the hands of saddam and osama.... a couple novels thick of mosaics..
|
When you take into account the *real* numbers of dead - not just US soldiers - who died as a result of Bush's "errors of judgement", Saddam may not be far behind, but Osama is not even in the picture.
Since the day that imbecile was chucked out of his mother's womb, Bush has been responsible for many human lives - even before playing President. Since then, on his orders, *around* 12,000-18,000 Iraq civilians have been killed in Iraq alone - forget Afghanistan (the popular thing to do about Afghanistan is "forget it") - there are enough faces in that to make a really nice full body picture of the village idiot.
Also consider adding all those who will die as a direct result of Bush's conduct - ie.. all who are/will suffer from the effects of depleted uranium in the "US wars". Currently the readings on this in Iraq are 1900 times higher than normal and reports of cancers/infant deformities have already risen dramatically. DR will not go away quick - people will died of this for many decades thanks to the "liberation" of Iraq.
It is safe to double the *actual* death toll of the war with the
"seconadary effects" of DR alone. When this affects/kills US soldiers, they discuss "syndromes". Why the fuck is the US govt unable to state an actual fact? These guys are dying because of depleted uranium poisoning - not some ephemism. The poor health status and death rate in US troops from this is astounding - It takes little brain to see the effects on civilians who will still be living in places affected by DR.
SO.... That nice work of art with a load of US soldiers who were unfortunate to have died serving Bush, is a totally unrealistic view of the real world. It is a US view which does not even get close to the real world and the effects of war.