Quote:
Originally posted by boobmaster
I think you are wrong. There is overwhelming medical evidence which strongly suggests that circumcision reduces the risk of various types of disease, including AIDS and cancer.
|
Some studies show that circumcision has a slight preventive effect for these AIDS and STDs; however, other studies show an insignificant or opposite effect. Either way, the bottom line is this: sexual practices have a much greater effect on the chance of becoming infected than circumcision status. If someone bases their actions on the belief that circumcision alone will protect them, they are taking unwise chances. And that's still not a good reason to mutilate a normal penis.
Would you mutilate your ears at birth if you knew it would reduce the possibility of getting ear infections? Give me a fucking break..
