Quote:
Originally posted by boobmaster
From the Mayo Clinic (one of the most reputable sources there is). Compare the risk of circumcising an infant with the risk of not circumcising an infant. I think it is clear that it is much riskier NOT to have the procedure.
http://www.mayoclinic.com/invoke.cfm...&bucket=staged
|
.. The first one points out the religeous crap, the second points out it's clean if its circumsized... never mention uncircumsized men can wash their penis too, and the third one is personal preferance.. If a parent has a problem with a natural body part, its not up to them to decide to have it cut off. If the babies could talk, they'd all tell the fucker to drop the scalpel.
The foreskin is there to protect the glans. As humans, every part of our body serves a purpose (aside from the appendix.. which just sort of hangs around). If the foreskin really wasnt needed, we'd never have evolved to have the foreskin.
I bet you looove your glans, all rough and dessensitized from years of rubbing inside your pants.