many great beatles songs. Beatles were my first music experience. At the age of 4 or 5 i had a small tape player with a single beatles tape. I remember yellow submarine and obladi oblada
it's obvious you wouldn't know good music if it was a 2x4 stuck straight up your ass.
oh boy.. the "good music" bandwagon emerges.
close your eyes, and LISTEN to the beatles, pretend it's not the beatles, and there's no peer pressure to try and seem 'cool' or 'hip' cause you listen to the beatles.
Originally posted by JSA Matt Wow, look at that one-track mind hard at work. Since when is it 'cool' to listen to the Beatles? A sterotype is all you got against the beatles?
no, i have nothing against them.
I like 1. and a few songs not on 1.
the actual albums themselves...
one or two kernels of corn mixed in with the overall turd.
most bands are like that.
beatles are no exception.
And incidentally, the Beatles WERE utter crap. The only thing they really had going for them was their charisma and their song-writing gifts and talents. (Which they did have in abundance, drugs or no drugs.)
If you listen to them, really listen to them play, you'll realize that many garage bands these days play better. Musically, they were utter crap. That wasn't their forte. Song wirting was their forte, and millions of fans pledge allegience to them above all.
ICQ: 11120676 | Google: mindcrime | Skype: suitemindcrime|E-Mail: mindcrime AT gmail.com|PR girl with great writing skills for hire!!!! Contact me to work for YOU!|TECHIEMEDIA? 24/7 support from some of the best techs in the biz. Tell Jim that I sent you.
And incidentally, the Beatles WERE utter crap. The only thing they really had going for them was their charisma and their song-writing gifts and talents. (Which they did have in abundance, drugs or no drugs.)
If you listen to them, really listen to them play, you'll realize that many garage bands these days play better. Musically, they were utter crap. That wasn't their forte. Song wirting was their forte, and millions of fans pledge allegience to them above all.
also if I was forced to pick an album aside from 1.. i'll take Abbey Road.
Come Together.. I Want You... Carry That Weight... Something... Because... Here Comes The Sun... You Never Gave Me Your Money... all good, the rest is junk..
Her Majesty gets a pass.. cause I saw Dennis Miller sing it somewhere... and Dennis Miller just fucking rules.
I like Revolver because that was their metamorphic album, when they truly broke away from bubblegum and defined themselves with unprecedented diversity of style as well as defined a few new styles.
Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training
"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."
no, i have nothing against them.
I like 1. and a few songs not on 1.
the actual albums themselves...
one or two kernels of corn mixed in with the overall turd.
most bands are like that.
beatles are no exception.
And incidentally, the Beatles WERE utter crap. The only thing they really had going for them was their charisma and their song-writing gifts and talents. (Which they did have in abundance, drugs or no drugs.)
If you listen to them, really listen to them play, you'll realize that many garage bands these days play better. Musically, they were utter crap. That wasn't their forte. Song wirting was their forte, and millions of fans pledge allegience to them above all.
If you people actually lived in those days and not base your judgements on what was happening then maybe your opinions would have some merrit.
Thousands of musicians today were influenced by the beatles in one way or another.Saying that they were "Utter Crap" just proves your ignorance and you should open your mind to differant musical tastes
Without invoking Led Zeppelin.
Here's 10, in no particular order
Metallica - ...and justice for all
Fugees - The Score
Enya - Day Without Rain
Korn - Untouchables
System Of A Down - Toxicity
De La Soul - Three Feet High & Rising
Blues Traveler - Four
Sublime - Sublime
Lords Of Acid - Lust
Rage Against The Machine - Rage Against The Machine
Originally posted by spunky1
Probably Eminem and Britney
Yuk.
Re-read what I said. Read it well and divine the meaning from it.
Let me help just in case you just can't get your head out of your self-righteous ass.
The Beatles were song-writing geniuses, I'm not debating that. their various styles and diversity of thought were what made them great. Musically, though, they were better off letting water buffalo play the instruments.
They were not masters of their instruments, but they were masters of song. Make sense?
Damn, have a different opinion around here and it gets you fuckin death row.
ICQ: 11120676 | Google: mindcrime | Skype: suitemindcrime|E-Mail: mindcrime AT gmail.com|PR girl with great writing skills for hire!!!! Contact me to work for YOU!|TECHIEMEDIA? 24/7 support from some of the best techs in the biz. Tell Jim that I sent you.
Musically Beatles were far from crap. They were genius. The hardest thing in music is simplecity. It's too hard to make a nice simple tune that will stand above all. It's too hard to create melody. Beatles could do that. Stones could do that. Leave behind their playing skills and the lack of complicated tunes and focus on melody.
With A Little Help From My Friends
Penny Lane
Love Me Do
I Want To Hold Your Hand
All You Need Is Love
And I Love Her
Hey Jude
Without invoking Led Zeppelin.
Here's 10, in no particular order
Metallica - ...and justice for all
Fugees - The Score
Enya - Day Without Rain
Korn - Untouchables
System Of A Down - Toxicity
De La Soul - Three Feet High & Rising
Blues Traveler - Four
Sublime - Sublime
Lords Of Acid - Lust
Rage Against The Machine - Rage Against The Machine
Originally posted by spunky1 If you people actually lived in those days and not base your judgements on what was happening then maybe your opinions would have some merrit.
Thousands of musicians today were influenced by the beatles in one way or another.Saying that they were "Utter Crap" just proves your ignorance and you should open your mind to differant musical tastes
Re-read what I said. Read it well and divine the meaning from it.
Let me help just in case you just can't get your head out of your self-righteous ass.
The Beatles were song-writing geniuses, I'm not debating that. their various styles and diversity of thought were what made them great. Musically, though, they were better off letting water buffalo play the instruments.
They were not masters of their instruments, but they were masters of song. Make sense?
Damn, have a different opinion around here and it gets you fuckin death row.
Were you even born in the sixties?.Did you know what instruments and technology were available back then?
I'm guessing no.. If they had the available technology today they would be easily more appreciated and respected.
Self righteous ass for an opinion..hmmm
Comment