Quote:
Originally posted by Pleasurepays
that highlights the silliness of your arguments and beliefs.
conversly, do the origins of the Bible need to be revealed or proven in anyway before you chose to believe in God? no. because as you obviously know.. the origins of the bible are unclear, not the mention the fact that it has been translated and rewritten countless times.... yet you accept the Bible as a record which cannot be proven over the arguments of science which as you just said yourself can at least be partially proven.
As i have said.. you have chosen to believe on argument and chosen not to believe another. Don't play them off as fact or as if one is better than the other. its a personal choice. nothing more.
|
Evolution is a scientific theory put forth by scientists. As a scientific theory, in order for it to be maintained, it needs to be supported by empirical scientific data. There is much empirical evidence supporting microevolution. There is none which supports macroevolution. Religion is a system of faith and is not subjected to the same standards. Nowhere in this thread do I claim that the existance of God is supported through empirical data. It is a question of faith. I believe he exists.
I will return to this thread after Mr. Kerry's speech.