|
Jesus this topic brought out the idiots from both sides didnt it.
Here's an oppinion from the outside.
-Moore defined using inacurate information unknowingly 'lying' which i think is pretty stupid. Especially when it comes from supposedly reliable sources such as the CIA. As stupid as it may be, it is not lying.
-O'reilly didn't ask the correct questions....could have done alot better.
-Moore used emotional and pointless argument when asking if O'reilly would sacrifice his son for falluja.
In summary......Moore was able to avoid O'reilly quite well by taking up time arguing definitions rather than issues. If I were O'reilly I would have asked him questions relating to the inaccuracies in his films, whether he believed his films were documentaries or entertainment, why he doesn't move abroad if its apparently far greatr etc.
Any oppinions?
|