Quote:
Originally posted by charly
Some of you are going over board.
This will not effect Non US webmasters, not hosting in the US, legally. Whether the TOS of the sponsor is broken that is down to individual sponsors.
This will effect US webmasters and sponsors big time, it could mean a lot more business for non US webmasters and sponsors. Unless you can comply with the new rules you are tied to FHGs or content so soft it will never be considered sexually explicit, if you are in the US. If you are not it's not a problem.
Using an example like CP or Beastiality to make a point is stretching it.
I don't see anywhere in the act where it says sponsors are responsible for their affiliates 2257 documentation. Maybe someone could point that out for me.
|
You just don't get it. Ashcfoft made these rules for one purpose to put porn out of busniess. Whether or not a sponsor is legally responsible won't be known until one actually get taken to court. Who is signing up for that duty? FEAR wil cause US sponsors to make it a rule that ALL webmasters must comply. Also any US sponors that has one set of very stringent rules for US webmasters and more liberal ones for foreign webmasters is a sponsor that will lose US webmasters.