Acacia -ACTG- Adds New Defendants to Patent Litigation and Seeks Class Action Status

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • - AFN -
    Confirmed User
    • Jun 2003
    • 3101

    #1

    Acacia -ACTG- Adds New Defendants to Patent Litigation and Seeks Class Action Status

    NEWPORT BEACH, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 18, 2003--Acacia Research Corporation (Nasdaq:ACTG) (Nasdaq:CBMX) announced today that it has added 8 new adult entertainment defendants to its patent infringement litigation, now pending in the District Court for the Central District of California. Acacia originally sued 39 adult entertainment companies, and prior to adding the new defendants, had only 11 defendants remaining in the litigation.

    The new Complaints, filed with the Court, seek to create a defendant class for all adult entertainment companies that infringe Acacia's DMT patents by transmitting pre-recorded, digital audio and audio/video adult content via any electronic communication channel into or from the Central District of California, or that operate at least one interactive website where a user located in Central District of California can exchange information with a host computer. Defendant class action status, which must be approved by the Court, would permit the Court's rulings on certain key issues to legally bind all members of the class, whether or not they have been specifically named as defendants in the litigation. This would result in a much more efficient use of Acacia's resources, eliminating the need for certain duplicative litigation.

    Acacia has entered into 106 license agreements for its DMT technology with companies in the hotel in-room entertainment, and online music, movie and adult entertainment industries.

    Acacia's DMT technology, which is covered by pioneering patents, relates to audio and video transmission and receiving systems, commonly known as audio-on-demand, video-on-demand, and audio/video streaming, and is used for distributing digital content via several means including Internet, cable television, satellite and wireless systems.

    http://home.businesswire.com/portal/...00&newsLang=en
    cat cash* | tr -d '\r' | tr -s '/n' > money
  • NBDesign
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2003
    • 5814

    #2
    I guess we need to start paying Al Gore royalties as well... after all, didn't he invent the internet?

    According to him he did....

    Use Lensman's program and get the most for your hard earned traffic.


    Get Heidi for your site Here. Lots of sets to choose from.
    She makes a great Addition to any site. Grab one Grab All.

    Comment

    • FightThisPatent
      Confirmed User
      • Aug 2003
      • 4090

      #3
      Working on finding the 8 adult company names..stay tuned..


      Fight The Delay!

      http://www.t3report.com
      (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
      http://www.FightThePatent.com
      | ICQ 52741957

      Comment

      • jennym
        Confirmed User
        • May 2003
        • 1622

        #4
        Quick question. If they are allowed to do a class action suit and they win, they won't have to file additional suits because it would cover everyone. Does that also mean if they lose that one "case" then they could not sue anyone else?

        Comment

        • RATBOY
          Confirmed User
          • May 2002
          • 1592

          #5
          This is a pathetic last resort. They are out of cash, the one last hail mary to get some profit out of this.

          Comment

          • vicki
            Confirmed User
            • Feb 2002
            • 1478

            #6
            holy cow .... thats a big change!!!

            jennyM - it would sure take with wind out of their sails and give them less fodder to fight with
            If at first you do succeed - try to hide your astonishment.

            HR merchant accounts from 3.45%
            solid biz since 98
            victoriakozub AT gmail.com
            skype: victoria.kozub | ICQ: 74296746

            Comment

            • SleazyDream
              I'm here for SPORT
              • Jul 2001
              • 41470

              #7
              didn't we already laugh our guts out at this announcement and how their stock just crashed?



              acacia must be really desprite these days
              This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!

              Now read without the word dog.

              Comment

              • FightThisPatent
                Confirmed User
                • Aug 2003
                • 4090

                #8
                Originally posted by jennym
                Quick question. If they are allowed to do a class action suit and they win, they won't have to file additional suits because it would cover everyone. Does that also mean if they lose that one "case" then they could not sue anyone else?


                It remains to be seen whether the judge will allow the plantiff to file the class action lawsuit against "adult industry" companies.. i am sure the current defendants will be raising "due process" objections.

                Acacia is pulling every legal trick in the book with actions like this.. it's not an uncommon tactic, as told to me by an attorney, so nothing to read into about these actions.

                If (WHEN!!) either the defendants or this class action deal defeated the patent claims, then the patent is found null and void.. so all companies would be free of this DMT patent.


                Fight the Suits!

                http://www.t3report.com
                (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
                http://www.FightThePatent.com
                | ICQ 52741957

                Comment

                • dig420
                  Confirmed User
                  • May 2001
                  • 9240

                  #9
                  Originally posted by NBDesign
                  I guess we need to start paying Al Gore royalties as well... after all, didn't he invent the internet?

                  According to him he did....
                  no. my typical conservative know-nothing, he didn't. BUT he was it's earliest congressional supporter and fought hard for it's funding in the early stages. Which is what he actually said. Which you have no way of knowing since you only listen to 'unbiased' figures like Rush 'Junkie' Limbaugh.

                  Comment

                  • MarkTiarra
                    Confirmed User
                    • Aug 2002
                    • 3833

                    #10
                    Originally posted by dig420


                    no. my typical conservative know-nothing, he didn't. BUT he was it's earliest congressional supporter and fought hard for it's funding in the early stages. Which is what he actually said. Which you have no way of knowing since you only listen to 'unbiased' figures like Rush 'Junkie' Limbaugh.

                    Isn't it amazing how one comment made by someone caliming it to be true can quickly turn into a "truth" excepted by so many?!

                    I wonder how much of the history we studied in school was completey innaccurate because someone said something they made up or misconstrued and it happened to be the thing that stuck...

                    Retired Pornosticator

                    Comment

                    • Mr.Fiction
                      Confirmed User
                      • Feb 2002
                      • 9484

                      #11
                      Originally posted by FightThisPatent
                      Working on finding the 8 adult company names..stay tuned..


                      Fight The Delay!
                      It's been three hours, who are the other 8?
                      Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

                      Comment

                      • FightThisPatent
                        Confirmed User
                        • Aug 2003
                        • 4090

                        #12
                        Originally posted by dig420


                        no. my typical conservative know-nothing, he didn't. BUT he was it's earliest congressional supporter and fought hard for it's funding in the early stages. Which is what he actually said. Which you have no way of knowing since you only listen to 'unbiased' figures like Rush 'Junkie' Limbaugh.


                        page (has citations and links on what Al said) that talks about Al Gore and the internet:


                        http://www.sethf.com/gore/



                        Fight the Link Challenged!

                        http://www.t3report.com
                        (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
                        http://www.FightThePatent.com
                        | ICQ 52741957

                        Comment

                        • FightThisPatent
                          Confirmed User
                          • Aug 2003
                          • 4090

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Mr.Fiction


                          It's been three hours, who are the other 8?


                          It seems as though the information has not been updated yet on the court databases (website). Probably tomorrow we'll see it.


                          Fight the Impatience!

                          http://www.t3report.com
                          (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
                          http://www.FightThePatent.com
                          | ICQ 52741957

                          Comment

                          • GonePhishing
                            Confirmed User
                            • Oct 2003
                            • 2474

                            #14
                            http://xbiz.com/articles/index.php?article_idp=938

                            Just in from xbiz, companies named...
                            If Biff Fucks My Mom... I Might Never Be Born...

                            Comment

                            • kamasutrababe
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jul 2003
                              • 140

                              #15
                              I've put my SELL recommendation on ACTG (Acacia Technologies Group). Maybe others should too. If ACTG share price falls, maybe people will start jumping ship before it sinks.

                              http://messages.yahoo.com/bbs?action...7080497&type=r

                              Comment

                              • Mr.Fiction
                                Confirmed User
                                • Feb 2002
                                • 9484

                                #16
                                Originally posted by GonePhishing
                                http://xbiz.com/articles/index.php?article_idp=938

                                Just in from xbiz, companies named...
                                I only see two companies named, not 8.

                                I don't see how they can legally demand that some random company represent all other companies in a court case, as they now appear to be trying to do.

                                Why would Python be allowed to represent all paysites or all plugin providers, for example? What if Python's lawyers fuck up? What if Max Cash's lawyers are better. What if each defendant wants their day in court with their own lawyers defending them?

                                It seems like the judge should slap Acacia down for trying to make one company represent all companies, or whatever they are trying to do.

                                Each company deserves their day in court if they want it.
                                Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

                                Comment

                                • Kick Ass Chat
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Dec 2002
                                  • 2057

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by kamasutrababe
                                  I've put my SELL recommendation on ACTG (Acacia Technologies Group). Maybe others should too. If ACTG share price falls, maybe people will start jumping ship before it sinks.

                                  http://messages.yahoo.com/bbs?action...7080497&type=r
                                  I would bet that actg is actually going to go up, they are not giving up, and people will be settling rather than fighting. Also some of the bigger mainstream companies will also settle rather than fight. ?? just my 2 cents
                                  [email protected]

                                  Comment

                                  • GonePhishing
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Oct 2003
                                    • 2474

                                    #18
                                    Yeah, the details in the article were a little short on explaination... I'm sure all of it will come out soon!
                                    If Biff Fucks My Mom... I Might Never Be Born...

                                    Comment

                                    • Mr.Fiction
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Feb 2002
                                      • 9484

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by GirlsFreePics


                                      I would bet that actg is actually going to go up, they are not giving up, and people will be settling rather than fighting. Also some of the bigger mainstream companies will also settle rather than fight. ?? just my 2 cents
                                      Some GFY members seem to be hoping so - probably the ones who bought Acacia shares at $8.
                                      Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

                                      Comment

                                      • - AFN -
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Jun 2003
                                        • 3101

                                        #20
                                        What rat bastards
                                        cat cash* | tr -d '\r' | tr -s '/n' > money

                                        Comment

                                        • Mr.Fiction
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Feb 2002
                                          • 9484

                                          #21
                                          Anyone find out who the 8 new companies being sued are yet?
                                          Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

                                          Comment

                                          • goBigtime
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Nov 2002
                                            • 7761

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by dig420


                                            no. my typical conservative know-nothing, he didn't. BUT he was it's earliest congressional supporter and fought hard for it's funding in the early stages. Which is what he actually said. Which you have no way of knowing since you only listen to 'unbiased' figures like Rush 'Junkie' Limbaugh.

                                            Comment

                                            Working...