|
From the Larry Walters article, I'm still not clear on a few things.
"Additionally, the required age records must be maintained and cross indexed in such a way that they are alphabetically and numerically (whatever that means) retrievable.
The other significant change is the updated requirement for the location of the Disclosure pertaining to the Custodian of Records. Under the proposed regulations, the Disclosure must be contained on the Web site?s ?home page? or ?main URL.? §75.8(d). The Disclosure must be in typeface not smaller that 11 points and must be displayed in black type, on a white, untinted background. §75.6(e). Moreover, under the proposed regulations, the Disclosure must be displayed in the same typeface as the names of the performer, director, producer, or owner, whichever is largest, and shall be no smaller in size than the largest of the names of the performers, director, producer, or owner.
"
I'd like to see how this looks. So this cross referencing is for the pics you have before the date it goes into effect or is retroactive?
I read that it's retroactive. I"m not a lawyer. If this is so, we have to reference it on an html page under the performers name, her real name, the director, producer, and where it is on our ser vers?
I have content providers who've provided doc that say "we are in compliance and you just have to link to us here". That's their "US2257 complaint" guarantee. My matrix docs are just drivers license jpgs with everything blackened out.
One of my providers said not to worry about it, because once this administration gets voted out, this will all go away. Besides, his stuff is in 1000's of boxes and it would take him weeks to go throught it to find my docs, if it goes that way.
Is anyone getting a helpful sponsor/provider. I'd rather start with the ones who are cooperating and replace the others if I run out of time.
EDit: also.. one provider has a clause in the license that you may never post the real name of the models. This is a prob....
|