07-19-2004, 10:32 PM
|
|
|
Chafed.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Face Down in Pussy
Posts: 18,041
|
Quote:
Originally posted by AaronM
No offence menat...But have you personally read the Proposed Regulations?
"(d) For any record created or amended after [insert date 30 days after publication of the final rule in the Federal Register], all such records shall be organized alphabetically, or numerically where appropriate, by the legal name of the performer (by last or family name, then first or given name), and shall be indexed or crossreferenced to each alias or other name used and to each title or identifying number of the book, magazine, film, videotape, computer-generated image, digital image, picture, or other matter (including but not limited to Internet computer site or services). If the producer subsequently produces an additional book, magazine, film, videotape, computer-generated image, digital image, or picture, or other matter (including but not limited to Internet computer site or services) that contains one or more visual depictions of actual sexually explicit conduct made by a performer for whom he maintains records as required by this part, the producer shall add the additional title or identifying number and the names of the performer to the existing records and such records shall thereafter be maintained in accordance
with this paragraph."
That's what you call a "Grandfather Clause."
With a minor adjustment. 
|
Thank GOD. I hope you are right about that one.
__________________
icq:159548293
|
|
|