Quote:
Originally posted by crockett
That's like saying McDonald's needs to have contact info, on every employee that works for Coca Cola Because they sell coke at Micky D's. It violates every sense of the word privacy for the model. It's like Roc hard said there is no way in hell any company is going to hand over their models address and phone number.
If that's what they are trying to do, it will hold up in a court of law about as well as John Asscraft at a boy scout camp.
|
There is no its not fair clause in the law. Did you didnt read what I wrote it happens now in print all the time. One of Rocs big affiliates gets arrested and all the others go bye bye. Everyone talks strong til the first gets clipped.Then the crying will start. Most of them rolled on the fight with Acacia you think they are going to fight the federal government in court thats funny . lol
It goes to court the court will say if you dont filter the people you do business with carefully enough its not the court problem. These arent surfers these are afiliates that these companies go into a agreement with to be in business together.