Do any of you liberal nit wits realize your buddies just sold........

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 12clicks
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Jan 2001
    • 19816

    #1

    Do any of you liberal nit wits realize your buddies just sold........

    you down the river?

    http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/11/na...partner=GOOGLE

    the left leaning supreme court justices thought it was a good idea to start limiting the 1st amendment.

    The right leaning court justices were trying to protect your first amendment rights:
    "If the Bill of Rights had intended an exception to the freedom of speech in order to combat this malign proclivity of the officeholder to agree with those who agree with him, and to speak more with his supporters than his opponents, it would surely have said so," Justice Scalia wrote.


    in other words, the Bill of Rights can now have an exception to the freedom of speech in order to combat this malign proclivity of PORN

    ahhh, to live in a liberal fog. if only I were that dumb.
    I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.
  • 12clicks
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Jan 2001
    • 19816

    #2
    holy shit!
    not even a personal attack?
    I guess some times I can be too right.
    I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

    Comment

    • TDF
      Triple OG nigga on GFY
      • Mar 2002
      • 27296

      #3
      just positionin myself for the armchair politicians...im bustina mad flare yo..peace
      Sig heil

      Comment

      • slapass
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Nov 2002
        • 14625

        #4
        Rush is that you? Back on the stuff already?

        12clicks, I know we are so far opposite politically that it is comical but even you don't see this as a direct attack on porn....right?

        Not good i agree over all.

        Comment

        • digi
          Confirmed User
          • Feb 2002
          • 1314

          #5
          90% of people loves porn, why is "fighting porn" a good thing in the public eye? I never understood that.

          Comment

          • Babaganoosh
            ♥♥♥ Likes Hugs ♥♥♥
            • Nov 2001
            • 15841

            #6
            Originally posted by 12clicks
            holy shit!
            not even a personal attack?
            I guess some times I can be too right.
            98% of the people who read the thread aren't smart enough to understand. Unless it's a thread about Iraq, most people will have nothing to say. I doubt there is as much banter to regurgitate on the subject of the US Constitution as there is on the war in Iraq.
            I like pie.

            Comment

            • 12clicks
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Jan 2001
              • 19816

              #7
              Originally posted by slapass
              Rush is that you? Back on the stuff already?

              12clicks, I know we are so far opposite politically that it is comical but even you don't see this as a direct attack on porn....right?

              Not good i agree over all.
              It's not a direct attack. thats why most of you don't get it.
              I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

              Comment

              • slapass
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Nov 2002
                • 14625

                #8
                We get it. we jsut saw it as a bigger attack on the current power structure so it was a give and take.

                If we get a nother terror attack and GB II is in office we will lose more of our liberty. He already is trying to destroy our constitutional freedoms and has.

                Comment

                • 12clicks
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Jan 2001
                  • 19816

                  #9
                  Originally posted by slapass
                  We get it. we jsut saw it as a bigger attack on the current power structure so it was a give and take.
                  sorry, you don't get it. The bill of rights is not something you play give and take with.


                  Originally posted by slapass
                  If we get a nother terror attack and GB II is in office we will lose more of our liberty. He already is trying to destroy our constitutional freedoms and has.
                  This is a lie, often told but never supported with facts.
                  Now please prattle on about how the patriot act has taken away our freedoms so I can ask you to point to just one instance of a US citizen not invovled with terrorists losing his constitutional freedoms.
                  I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

                  Comment

                  • GonePhishing
                    Confirmed User
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 2474

                    #10
                    In terms of the supreme court... It depends more on if each justice is more of a purest or an interpretist. Not as much to do with being left or right.
                    If Biff Fucks My Mom... I Might Never Be Born...

                    Comment

                    • DoubleD
                      Confirmed User
                      • Dec 2003
                      • 758

                      #11
                      I have to admit many of the decesions of the right-wing administration has me on edge when it comes to the industry. When internet pornography and so-called "offensive material" is used as a political tool it's not good. But I'd like to believe that we serve in one of the oldest proffesions, we deal in sex and fantasy. Everyone has it or wants it, republicans, democrats, everyone. I'm gonna' wish for the best and hope that the desire for civil rights and freedoms is more powerful than political agendas. We'll see in the next election...
                      BeSocial.com
                      The New and Exciting Casual Dating Social Network

                      icq: 165049736

                      Comment

                      • ytcracker
                        stc is the greatest
                        • Dec 2002
                        • 12403

                        #12
                        the right is right
                        join the fight

                        dont worry bush will get reelected if my vote counts
                        www.ytcracker.com | www.digitalgangster.com
                        i love you

                        Comment

                        • evildick

                          #13
                          Originally posted by 12clicks


                          so I can ask you to point to just one instance of a US citizen not invovled with terrorists losing his constitutional freedoms.
                          There might be some debate whether or not they lost constitutional freedoms in this case.

                          http://reviewjournal.printthis.click...&partnerID=565

                          Of course he was as crooked as the day is long, but he wasn't a terrorist. I guess as long as they use it to clean up the trash there's not much reason to complain. As long as they don't decide that legitimate pornographers are "trash".

                          Comment

                          • Mr.Fiction
                            Confirmed User
                            • Feb 2002
                            • 9484

                            #14
                            Sure, and laws against bribery are also unconstitutional.

                            Anything that pisses off the brainwashed right wingers can't be all bad.

                            Pornography pisses them off and so does this ruling.

                            Only Rush's voice can make them happy.
                            Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

                            Comment

                            • rett11
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 397

                              #15
                              here's where my liberal fog has led me:

                              http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/28/politics/28LEGA.html

                              Justice Department officials said the cases cited in the report
                              represent only a small sampling of the many hundreds of nonterrorism
                              cases pursued under the law." -jlh
                              PussyCash pays $100 for every ImLive signup

                              Comment

                              • $5 submissions
                                I help you SUCCEED
                                • Nov 2003
                                • 32189

                                #16
                                Hmmmm "liberal" is such a broad word. Does a fiscal conservative with socially liberal values fall under this label?

                                Comment

                                • rett11
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Jan 2003
                                  • 397

                                  #17
                                  Oh, and how could we forget the most famous misuse of the Patriot Act so far. Ashhahahahaha used it to put Tommy Chong in jail for selling bongs.
                                  PussyCash pays $100 for every ImLive signup

                                  Comment

                                  • dig420
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • May 2001
                                    • 9240

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by 12clicks


                                    This is a lie, often told but never supported with facts.
                                    Now please prattle on about how the patriot act has taken away our freedoms so I can ask you to point to just one instance of a US citizen not invovled with terrorists losing his constitutional freedoms.
                                    how the FUCK would we know since suspects are being held without without being charged, no access to attorney's and often without even notifying anyone they're being held? You right-wing nut jobs just stagger me with your willful ignorance.

                                    also, this article isn't about suppressing the 1st Amendment, which anyone with a more than passing familiarity with the English language would be able to comprehend. It's about campaign finance reform, something that is badly needed since we now have energy companies writing the legislation they want their bought and paid for political party, the Republicans, to pass.

                                    See, what happens is that insurance companies spend millions of dollars on advertising to convince the dumb and gullible that there is a 'litigation explosion' whereby your average jane and john doe are trying to bankrupt the sweet and innocent insurance industry. They want caps on malpractice awards etc. The Defense industry wants to convince the dumb and gullible that the USSR is a great danger to this country. Then Iran. Then Iraq. Then China, whatever boogieman of the day will help them sell bombs to the government. The Energy companies want the dumb and gullible to believe that government regulation is killing their business by not allowing them to collude and fix prices and hold meetings with Dick Cheney where they hand him the finished bills they want passed. The Republican Party is the designated lapdog of these large corporations and it stays that way because large corporations are allowed to underwrite the financial costs of getting elected. The Republican Party does not want this situation to change.

                                    There are a lot of dumb and gullible people out there, most of them are Republicans, but not very many of them are willing to strut and say how proud they are of their gullibility on public message boards.

                                    Comment

                                    • dig420
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • May 2001
                                      • 9240

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by $5 submissions
                                      Hmmmm "liberal" is such a broad word. Does a fiscal conservative with socially liberal values fall under this label?
                                      for conservatives, anyone who reads a book, speaks a foreign language and doesn't hate jews is a liberal. What is termed 'liberal' now used to be the mainstream.

                                      Comment

                                      • GonePhishing
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Oct 2003
                                        • 2474

                                        #20
                                        Does this board rewrite ashahahaha everytime someone tries to write ashhahahahaha (lets see... I spelled it out the right way... if it says ashahahaha) then I will know for sure!
                                        If Biff Fucks My Mom... I Might Never Be Born...

                                        Comment

                                        • GonePhishing
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Oct 2003
                                          • 2474

                                          #21
                                          Wow it really does do that! That's cool as shit!
                                          If Biff Fucks My Mom... I Might Never Be Born...

                                          Comment

                                          • arg
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Feb 2003
                                            • 1164

                                            #22
                                            There are many limitations on the first amendment already. Shouting "fire" in a crowded theater, divulging information that jeopardizes national security, libel and slander, obscenity, child porn, profiting from stories of ones federal felonies, incitement to commit a crime, cussing out a judge in court, and so on. Limits are added and removed with regularity. The court recognized that the campaign finance reform laws were an abridgement of first amendment rights, but felt that the state had a compelling overriding interest in regulating the election process. Just as forbidding people from shouting fire in crowded theaters limits first amendment rights, but the state has a compelling competing interest in providing for the safety of the public.

                                            While the decision of the court is certainly open to debate, to argue that the first amendment should have no limits ignores two centuries of precedants to the contrary.

                                            Comment

                                            • Fletch XXX
                                              GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
                                              • Jan 2002
                                              • 60840

                                              #23


                                              all the roads lead to war.

                                              america loves it.

                                              support the war.

                                              Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

                                              Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

                                              Comment

                                              • reynold
                                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                • Oct 2002
                                                • 51271

                                                #24
                                                Interesting legal analysis.

                                                Comment

                                                • cluck
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Dec 2002
                                                  • 5248

                                                  #25
                                                  Like professor fletch says, "Vote with bullets."
                                                  icq 279990726
                                                  www.mcdonalds.com <- great money making opportunity

                                                  Comment

                                                  • crockett
                                                    in a van by the river
                                                    • May 2003
                                                    • 76818

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by 12clicks


                                                    This is a lie, often told but never supported with facts.
                                                    Now please prattle on about how the patriot act has taken away our freedoms so I can ask you to point to just one instance of a US citizen not invovled with terrorists losing his constitutional freedoms.
                                                    http://news.com.com/2100-1017-994810.html

                                                    how about paypal? just as a guess but could this have also been the reason paypal stopped allowing adult transactions?
                                                    In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • TurboAngel
                                                      H.B.I.C.
                                                      • Jun 2003
                                                      • 30122

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by Armed & Hammered


                                                      98% of the people who read the thread aren't smart enough to understand. Unless it's a thread about Iraq, most people will have nothing to say. I doubt there is as much banter to regurgitate on the subject of the US Constitution as there is on the war in Iraq.

                                                      So true!



                                                      P.S. I hate that game you guys play so don't tell Turboface when it's time to play!

                                                      Comment

                                                      • Interlude
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • Feb 2001
                                                        • 1147

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by dig420
                                                        for conservatives, anyone who reads a book, speaks a foreign language and doesn't hate jews is a liberal. What is termed 'liberal' now used to be the mainstream.
                                                        Hate jews? You kidding? Liberals are the most anti-semetic, anti-Israel fuckers out there.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • Interlude
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Feb 2001
                                                          • 1147

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by crockett
                                                          http://news.com.com/2100-1017-994810.html

                                                          how about paypal? just as a guess but could this have also been the reason paypal stopped allowing adult transactions?
                                                          Or maybe it had to do with the alignment of Pluto in the 3rd House that day. Notice that we've provided equal evidence for our retarded points.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • cluck
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Dec 2002
                                                            • 5248

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by Interlude
                                                            Hate jews? You kidding? Liberals are the most anti-semetic, anti-Israel fuckers out there.
                                                            What's anti-Israel got to do with anti-semitic.

                                                            I just think that zionist jews are idiots for trying to still occupy that little piece of shit in the desert, even if it means getting our asses involved.
                                                            icq 279990726
                                                            www.mcdonalds.com <- great money making opportunity

                                                            Comment

                                                            • crockett
                                                              in a van by the river
                                                              • May 2003
                                                              • 76818

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by Interlude
                                                              Or maybe it had to do with the alignment of Pluto in the 3rd House that day. Notice that we've provided equal evidence for our retarded points.
                                                              did you read the article? I posted it because he was asking for proof of the use of the Patriot Act in Non-Terror related cases. I would say the Paypal case would be proof.

                                                              I however did add in the part of a connection of paypal having to stop processing online casinos and them stopping Adult processing. There may have been no connection, but I don't think it would be a very big stretch to think they decided to lump adult in with casinos as too high of a risk.
                                                              In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                                              Comment

                                                              • - AFN -
                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                • Jun 2003
                                                                • 3101

                                                                #32
                                                                12clicks you are the smartest man ever. Dude, fuck Newton, Galileo, Einstein, Locke, Emerson, Jefferson, John Jay, Adam Smith, etc you are the Brain! I am just so damn ecstatic I get to share this planet with someone as enlightened and wise as you. It is people like you that take humanity to the next level. Thank you, 12clicks, for being born. Thank you, for gracing us with your wisdom and even tolerating our inferior existence so you can enlighten us.

                                                                I am deeply humbled.




                                                                Originally posted by 12clicks
                                                                you down the river?

                                                                http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/11/na...partner=GOOGLE

                                                                the left leaning supreme court justices thought it was a good idea to start limiting the 1st amendment.

                                                                The right leaning court justices were trying to protect your first amendment rights:
                                                                "If the Bill of Rights had intended an exception to the freedom of speech in order to combat this malign proclivity of the officeholder to agree with those who agree with him, and to speak more with his supporters than his opponents, it would surely have said so," Justice Scalia wrote.


                                                                in other words, the Bill of Rights can now have an exception to the freedom of speech in order to combat this malign proclivity of PORN

                                                                ahhh, to live in a liberal fog. if only I were that dumb.
                                                                cat cash* | tr -d '\r' | tr -s '/n' > money

                                                                Comment

                                                                • dig420
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • May 2001
                                                                  • 9240

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by crockett


                                                                  did you read the article? I posted it because he was asking for proof of the use of the Patriot Act in Non-Terror related cases. I would say the Paypal case would be proof.
                                                                  Hell no he didn't read the article, he's a conservative and it's just too hard, all those little words all strung together like that.

                                                                  Conservatives get all their information from AM radio.

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • 12clicks
                                                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                    • Jan 2001
                                                                    • 19816

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by dig420


                                                                    how the FUCK would we know since suspects are being held without without being charged, no access to attorney's and often without even notifying anyone they're being held? You right-wing nut jobs just stagger me with your willful ignorance.

                                                                    also, this article isn't about suppressing the 1st Amendment, which anyone with a more than passing familiarity with the English language would be able to comprehend. It's about campaign finance reform, something that is badly needed since we now have energy companies writing the legislation they want their bought and paid for political party, the Republicans, to pass.

                                                                    See, what happens is that insurance companies spend millions of dollars on advertising to convince the dumb and gullible that there is a 'litigation explosion' whereby your average jane and john doe are trying to bankrupt the sweet and innocent insurance industry. They want caps on malpractice awards etc. The Defense industry wants to convince the dumb and gullible that the USSR is a great danger to this country. Then Iran. Then Iraq. Then China, whatever boogieman of the day will help them sell bombs to the government. The Energy companies want the dumb and gullible to believe that government regulation is killing their business by not allowing them to collude and fix prices and hold meetings with Dick Cheney where they hand him the finished bills they want passed. The Republican Party is the designated lapdog of these large corporations and it stays that way because large corporations are allowed to underwrite the financial costs of getting elected. The Republican Party does not want this situation to change.

                                                                    There are a lot of dumb and gullible people out there, most of them are Republicans, but not very many of them are willing to strut and say how proud they are of their gullibility on public message boards.
                                                                    ahhh, I knew I could scare up a left wing nut job.

                                                                    I guess Justice Scalia is one of those dumb and gullable people out there.

                                                                    "If the Bill of Rights had intended an exception to the freedom of speech in order to combat this malign proclivity of the officeholder to agree with those who agree with him, and to speak more with his supporters than his opponents, it would surely have said so," Justice Scalia wrote.


                                                                    Its going to be a hilarious election.
                                                                    All of the leftists will be outraged that 80% of the people could be so gullable.
                                                                    They'll not even be bright enough to even CONSIDER they should put down the liberal pipe and get an education.


                                                                    I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    Working...