porngraph stats, or fake broker? - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

{fusion}

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 1650
Share

Post
#1

porngraph stats, or fake broker?

12-06-2003, 11:20 PM

right ive got 2 lots of stats here from a traffic broker. one is logged with porngraph for which i always use and one is there internal stats.

now compare and tell me if porngraph counter is out of not logging some countries or am i being tricked?

here are the pages

porngraph stats

broker stats

the traffic was being sent to a console which i now nuked the images.

the server is showing raw stats but i use porngraph all the time with many different traffic brokers and methods and they have all been spot on.
Tags: None
Roald

SecretFriends.com

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 27910
Share

Post
#2

12-06-2003, 11:21 PM

edit: nevermind

WE ARE BUYING PAY SITES! CONTACT ME

ClubSweethearts | ManUpFilms | SinfulXXX | HOT * AdultPrime * HOT

Paying webmasters since 1996! Contact: r.riepen @ sansylgroup.com | telegram: roaldr
Comment
Theo

HAL 9000

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 34515
Share

Post
#3

12-06-2003, 11:23 PM

porngraph is the best free counter i have ever tried. It counts near everything if you put it at top of your page
Comment
pamphage

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 3569
Share

Post
#4

12-06-2003, 11:23 PM

all image counters are unreliable. check your logs.

SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR.
Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
Let me repeat... A 120 x 60 button and no more that 3 lines of DEFAULT SIZE AND COLOR text.
Comment
Theo

HAL 9000

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 34515
Share

Post
#5

12-06-2003, 11:24 PM

http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html

your images are broken?
Comment
{fusion}

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 1650
Share

Post
#6

12-06-2003, 11:26 PM

yeah its always been spot on for me also. cant figure this out as if it was hitbot would the hits be logged as anonymous proxy?

the console was just set up to test that one broker, i nuked the images as i see that its just wasting bandwidth as i have 30k left to come.
Comment
pamphage

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 3569
Share

Post
#7

12-06-2003, 11:28 PM

Originally posted by {fusion}
yeah its always been spot on for me also. cant figure this out as if it was hitbot would the hits be logged as anonymous proxy?

hitbot's can theoretically be anything. hitbot's are always evolving...challenging our ability to catch them.

SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR.
Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
Let me repeat... A 120 x 60 button and no more that 3 lines of DEFAULT SIZE AND COLOR text.
Comment
integrated

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2003

Posts: 3826
Share

Post
#8

12-06-2003, 11:30 PM

i have had alot of bullshit with brokers saying they have sent X amount when they have not sent shit

Pioneer of .TV domains
Grandfather of .TV development
Respected among industry LEADERS
Comment
{fusion}

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 1650
Share

Post
#9

12-06-2003, 11:32 PM

ive used alot like spotbrokers,sexcity,adultrafficgen and they have all be pretty much sound and porngraph stats are 98% spot on
Comment
{fusion}

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 1650
Share

Post
#10

12-06-2003, 11:41 PM

These are some raw logs coming from this broker, do they look normal.

239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:41 -0800] "GET /console/newlover/images/findanewlover-fpa-01_02.jpg HTTP/1.1" 302 292 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:41 -0800] "GET /console/newlover/images/findanewlover-fpa-01_03.jpg HTTP/1.1" 302 292 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:41 -0800] "GET /console/newlover/images/findanewlover-fpa-01_04.gif HTTP/1.1" 302 292 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:41 -0800] "GET /console/newlover/images/findanewlover-fpa-01_05.gif HTTP/1.1" 302 292 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:41 -0800] "GET /console/newlover/images/findanewlover-fpa-01_06.gif HTTP/1.1" 302 292 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:41 -0800] "GET /console/newlover/images/findanewlover-fpa-01_07.jpg HTTP/1.1" 302 292 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:42 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 24493 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:42 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 24493 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:42 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 24493 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:42 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 24493 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:42 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 24493 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:42 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 24493 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
Comment
SpaceAce

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 6493
Share

Post
#11

12-06-2003, 11:45 PM

Originally posted by pamphage
all image counters are unreliable. check your logs.

If you think about it, it's easier to fool server logs than an image counter. All a hitbot or whatever has to do to fool your server is request the page. To fool an image counter, it has to identify and load images. With most counters, that would include executing some J.avaS.cript. So, you definitely cannot trust server logs in this case. No widespread image counter is unreliable enough to count only a couple of hundred hits out of 11,000.

SpaceAce
Comment
SpaceAce

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 6493
Share

Post
#12

12-06-2003, 11:48 PM

Originally posted by {fusion}

Lots of stuff...

Look for any IP addresses that only request the HTML page. <B>If</B> your broker is sending false hits, there is a chance that his hit generator would request the HTML and not bother loading all the images. Also look for IP addresses that have the same exact User-Agent, especially if those IPs are requesting images and files in a seemingly random fashion.

SpaceAce
Comment
stocktrader23

Let's do some business.

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 18781
Share

Post
#13

12-06-2003, 11:48 PM

Originally posted by {fusion}
right ive got 2 lots of stats here from a traffic broker. one is logged with porngraph for which i always use and one is there internal stats.

now compare and tell me if porngraph counter is out of not logging some countries or am i being tricked?

here are the pages

porngraph stats

broker stats

the traffic was being sent to a console which i now nuked the images.

the server is showing raw stats but i use porngraph all the time with many different traffic brokers and methods and they have all been spot on.

Are you using the php counter code by chance? I had 1 page that WOULD NOT count hits on porngraph when it came from a redirect. I popped the java code back in and all was good.

Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life

"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."
Comment
{fusion}

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 1650
Share

Post
#14

12-06-2003, 11:50 PM

whats very strange also is that the ip's are showing but not being counted for.

so your saying hitbots can go further than just port 8888 or whatever they use?
Comment
SpaceAce

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 6493
Share

Post
#15

12-06-2003, 11:52 PM

Originally posted by {fusion}
whats very strange also is that the ip's are showing but not being counted for.

so your saying hitbots can go further than just port 8888 or whatever they use?

Proxies can be run on any port. 8000, 8080, 1080 and 3128 are the most common but not the only ones.

SpaceAce
Comment
{fusion}

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 1650
Share

Post
#16

12-06-2003, 11:53 PM

stockertrader, it is java counter. i use the same method all the time.
Comment
SpaceAce

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 6493
Share

Post
#17

12-06-2003, 11:54 PM

Also, unless 221.136.239.254 is a cumpulsive reloader, I think it's a tad odd that he seems to like GETting your / document so many times.

SpaceAce
Comment
stocktrader23

Let's do some business.

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 18781
Share

Post
#18

12-06-2003, 11:55 PM

Originally posted by {fusion}
stockertrader, it is java counter. i use the same method all the time.

Do you redirect the hits to the page or does the broker? For some reason when my redirect was abc.php and it hit domain.com/abc.html it wouldn't count. I changed to name of one or the other and it worked. Dunno

Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life

"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."
Comment
{fusion}

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 1650
Share

Post
#19

12-07-2003, 12:02 AM

well it seems to count china traffic

no theres no redirection my side, its just static html

Last edited by {fusion}; 12-07-2003, 12:05 AM.
Comment
pamphage

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 3569
Share

Post
#20

12-07-2003, 12:10 AM

Originally posted by SpaceAce

If you think about it, it's easier to fool server logs than an image counter. All a hitbot or whatever has to do to fool your server is request the page. To fool an image counter, it has to identify and load images. With most counters, that would include executing some J.avaS.cript. So, you definitely cannot trust server logs in this case. No widespread image counter is unreliable enough to count only a couple of hundred hits out of 11,000.

SpaceAce

good points.

SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR.
Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
Let me repeat... A 120 x 60 button and no more that 3 lines of DEFAULT SIZE AND COLOR text.
Comment
ravo

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2001

Posts: 5464
Share

Post
#21

12-07-2003, 06:20 AM

Who is the traffic broker?

whois STATSPAGE.NET returns false info.

AdultAdBroker - Buy and Sell Your Flat Rate Banners, Links, Tabs, Pops, Email Clicks and Members' Area Traffic - updated May 2026
Comment
JamesK

hi

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 16731
Share

Post
#22

12-07-2003, 06:24 AM

looks like a scam (the traffic broker)

M3Server - NATS Hosting
Comment
{fusion}

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 1650
Share

Post
#23

12-07-2003, 07:03 AM

it is www.xxxadvertising.net not sure if anyone else has used them but this is the only broker that i've had this happen
Comment
Weppel

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2003

Posts: 2190
Share

Post
#24

12-07-2003, 07:11 AM

Originally posted by {fusion}
These are some raw logs coming from this broker, do they look normal.

239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:41 -0800] "GET /console/newlover/images/findanewlover-fpa-01_02.jpg HTTP/1.1" 302 292 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:41 -0800] "GET /console/newlover/images/findanewlover-fpa-01_03.jpg HTTP/1.1" 302 292 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:41 -0800] "GET /console/newlover/images/findanewlover-fpa-01_04.gif HTTP/1.1" 302 292 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:41 -0800] "GET /console/newlover/images/findanewlover-fpa-01_05.gif HTTP/1.1" 302 292 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:41 -0800] "GET /console/newlover/images/findanewlover-fpa-01_06.gif HTTP/1.1" 302 292 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:41 -0800] "GET /console/newlover/images/findanewlover-fpa-01_07.jpg HTTP/1.1" 302 292 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:42 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 24493 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:42 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 24493 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:42 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 24493 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:42 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 24493 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:42 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 24493 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
221.136.239.254 - - [07/Dec/2003:00:07:42 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 24493 "http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"

Could you do me a favour and hit me up on ICQ 46762719? I'd like to get some more (200k or something) of logfiles and analyse it.

To me this looks like a pretty good written hitbot (it requests images in random order too), and if i'm correct, this guy has to be out of the biz asap
Comment
chodadog

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2002

Posts: 9736
Share

Post
#25

12-07-2003, 08:14 AM

Don't forget to get your money back:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/websc...-buyer-outside

26 + 6 = 1
Comment
Veterans Day

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 8403
Share

Post
#26

12-07-2003, 08:19 AM

if that shit comes out to be hitbot, sure looks like it, get your money back asap. FUCK THAT, what a shame

Build a Massive Traffic Network, Hands FREE, Totally Automated
Comment
rabbit

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 2124
Share

Post
#27

12-07-2003, 08:26 AM

porgraph has been having problems with their referral stats, maybe this is related...

the rabbit

Got a paysite? Get it reviewed by RabbitsReviews and TheBestPorn
Comment
Veterans Day

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 8403
Share

Post
#28

12-07-2003, 08:31 AM

Originally posted by carbondream
porgraph has been having problems with their referral stats, maybe this is related...

the rabbit

thats a pretty big difference?

Build a Massive Traffic Network, Hands FREE, Totally Automated
Comment
{fusion}

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 1650
Share

Post
#29

12-07-2003, 08:51 AM

http://www.samspade.org/t/lookat?a=SERVAK.BIZ

hosting and everything leads back to here. say uk address but sounds very russian name and that isnt a uk address or phone number.

i think enough said.
Comment
Nathan

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 3108
Share

Post
#30

12-07-2003, 09:22 AM

Hey fusion,

I checked your PornGraph stats, and I am very very sure that its not our fault. None of the hits seem to be generating any referrers, except for the hits coming from this thread.

I bet its a hitbot, or the traffic is sent.

If you have shell access on the server, go to the dir the log is in and enter this command:

cat <logfile> |grep -v '221.136.239.254' |grep 'GET /console/newlover' |wc -l

where <logfile> is the logfile name.. that will give you the number of entries in the log NOT from that ip that requested the console or console images.. So if the traffic would be real you should see something like hits_bought * (number_of_images+1) ... or something around that at least.... of course, only if the log is fresh for just that campaign.

You can remove the -v in the first grep to make it look for only that ip,. which will give you the info on how many hits came from just that one.

Hope this help...

"Think about it a little more and you'll agree with me, because you're smart and I'm right."
- Charlie Munger
Comment
dig420

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 9240
Share

Post
#31

12-07-2003, 09:36 AM

if Nathan says it is so, it is so.
Comment
Adult-biz

Service Provider

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 2139
Share

Post
#32

12-07-2003, 09:44 AM

Ok, I am the traffic supplier in question. Before I cover some of the comments that you made can I just ask the question why don`t you contact me first before posting this stuff ?

I appreciate that this board along with all the others is a forum where people can speak freely but surely this kind of stuff should be posted after dialogue has been made directly with me ( I have your email that you sent a short time ago but this was sent only 2 hours ago which hasn`t given me adequate time to reply ).

I don`t think that is a lot to ask.

Anyway onto your order and your questions and the fact that you purposely have not quoted the full details.

1. I offered you an additional 3,000 visitors free of charge because of this slight delay in starting your campaign.

2. Your email that you have just sent reads exactly like this -

"please delete the campaign and the rest of the traffic as your hitbotting, i log stats which i can show and my counters are always spot on with all brokers i buy from, i dont know how i can only get 100 or so shit uniques from 11,000 uniques, no refers ever show and my raw stats are in waves which i can tell are hitbots. if your reselling i would stop using them"

This "hitbot" traffic as you put it that you are receiving is in fact predominantly my 404 error traffic from my two hosting networks and IS ABSOLUTELY NOT HITBOT OR COMPUTER GENERATED HITS.

I don`t need to quote the following but I will - these visitors that you have received is made up of my 404 error traffic and is actually delivered to many TGP owners with very high traffic sites and just as importantly delivered to some of the leading traffic suppliers in this industry and resold on.

This traffic consistently yields productivity of between 30 - 40 % ( which I can prove ). I appreciate this is not brilliant but then this traffic is priced reasonably ( as low as $ 2 USD per 1,000 and even less than this for volume purchases ).

Have you thought of asking the question that the problem might be at your end and at your site ?

3. Java counters / trackers are notoriously unreliable and the numbers of uniques that you have quoted receiving are quite frankly rediculous ( 134 ? ).

4. You are probably not seeing referrals because this traffic is being delivered thru my adserver.

5. This is MY TRAFFIC - I do not resell this traffic for anybody else.

I DO NOT sell bot traffic. An apology would be nice.

Thank you.
Comment
{fusion}

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 1650
Share

Post
#33

12-07-2003, 09:50 AM

no referrers is strange enough. there is 100 or so hits showing mainly from china but no referrers from them also if you look.
Comment
Nathan

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 3108
Share

Post
#34

12-07-2003, 09:50 AM

sexus,

the counter in question here is PornGraph, and trust me, we are never that far off ;) Or else we would hardly track 60 million hits a day.

To get all this resolved in the best way, I suggest you give me the _EXACT_ URL that you sent traffic to. Also tell me what kind of ad server you are using and with which header code it redirects.

It should not destroy the referrer.

dig420,

thanks

"Think about it a little more and you'll agree with me, because you're smart and I'm right."
- Charlie Munger
Comment
Adult-biz

Service Provider

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 2139
Share

Post
#35

12-07-2003, 10:03 AM

Nathan, the adserver is ETS ( Enterprise Traffic Server ).

The page where traffic was sent to is http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html which amusingly displays no images ( as another member posted above ).

Traffic is from the following hosts -

sexushost.com
xadulthosting.com

Once again I state that this traffic is NOT BOT. The vast majority of the traffic sent to you is true 404 traffic and reaches all my clients sites via a very clean redirection.

The stats which fusion has quoted truely cannot be believed.
Comment
{fusion}

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 1650
Share

Post
#36

12-07-2003, 10:08 AM

sexus,

The images i removed to save bandwidth, like i said this console was just set up to test your traffic, i removed the images when i saw this happening

anyone with stats like these would do the same thing, as cheaters are everywhere.

nothing checks out, no refers ect

when ive used refers with redirection before its always showed the redirection url at least, i.e www.blah.com/redirect.php for example

also how come 100 or so hits come through? and these dont have refers also?

anyone in my shoes would be suspisious of this activity.

Last edited by {fusion}; 12-07-2003, 10:10 AM.
Comment
Adult-biz

Service Provider

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 2139
Share

Post
#37

12-07-2003, 10:17 AM

So tell me fusion, why post here this stuff ?

I very rarely post on this board or any other board as you can probably see with my pathetic number of postings purely because I do not have the time. Why didn`t you contact me so we can address your concerns ?

You talk about being suspicious well perhaps you can answer me the following -

When I send 75 - 125,000 visitors consistently every day to clients sites, resellers and `major` traffic suppliers then the numbers being received from them are a maximum of 10 - 15 % different to my own stats that I provide which is considered the industry standard anyway.

Are all these people wrong apart from you ?

Thank you.

Paul / Jo
Owners - xxxadvertising.net ( along with numerous other adult / non adult businesses ).
Comment
{fusion}

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 1650
Share

Post
#38

12-07-2003, 10:22 AM

sexus, the figures are more than true.

nathan is coder there and has logged in and checked my stats, and you have heard it from him

if anyone wants to check your stats

http://www.statspage.net/

u: newlover
p: newlover

i have nothing to hide here. I have bought from quite a few brokers and never made a bad comment once, people that know me no im not full of shit.

i bring it to the board because i wanted other peoples views including porngraph

Last edited by {fusion}; 12-07-2003, 10:24 AM.
Comment
maxjohan

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 7219
Share

Post
#39

12-07-2003, 10:25 AM

It's something with my stats too..I think I has the same problem..my site shows X hits but not when I look on details it's 10 times less then.

I went from 100 to 313,000 satoshis in 2 days! Lots of daily freerolls...
Comment
{fusion}

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 1650
Share

Post
#40

12-07-2003, 10:29 AM

sexus

were talking 100 hits out of 11,000 were counted. no java counter is that shit.

take it from me, alot of sites use porngraph and there solid

also out of the 100 that actually made it, 90% was from china.
Comment
4Pics

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2001

Posts: 7952
Share

Post
#41

12-07-2003, 10:42 AM

This is why you buy your hits from Jesus Traffic!!!

If you can't trust Jesus who can you trust!
Comment
Adult-biz

Service Provider

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 2139
Share

Post
#42

12-07-2003, 10:47 AM

maxjohan, sorry I was not sure what point you was making ? Are you supporting porngraph stats or stating that you had the same issue with them and that they were not tracking everything ?

Please clarify.

Fusion -

Do you honestly expect me to believe that only 100 or so hits out of 11 K are showing ?

Stupid statement.

I am becoming tired of repeating my point -

1. We do not supply bot traffic.
2. Traffic sent to clients / resellers etc. shows a variation ranging from 2 % - 15 % depending on the tracking used.

I suggest you post your raw logs for when this traffic commenced and we will see who is telling the truth.

For the record if anybody is interested, the following is the 404 eror traffic sent to -http://www.iansamateurs.com/console/newlover/index.html for today only -

Statistics for a day
Hour Unique
0 114
1 74
2 44
3 61
4 79
5 85
6 97
7 111
8 99
9 77
10 70

It is very easy for anybody coming onto this board and make all sorts of opinions be it blatant lies or truth.

People ( members ) can only comment on any statements made on these boards and provide feedback on what has been quoted so a postive or negative opinion can be formed very quickly and can work for or against you whether it be utter bollocks or a true reflection.

Fusion - do you honestly think I would really only send 134 hits to a page out of some 11,000 ?

Thank you.
Comment
{fusion}

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 1650
Share

Post
#43

12-07-2003, 11:09 AM

so you saying i made the figures up? i dont have time to go around doing stuff like that, but i do have time to expose cheaters.
Comment
Nathan

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 3108
Share

Post
#44

12-07-2003, 11:12 AM

Hi sexus,

what maxjohan is talking about is the fact that sometimes REFERRER stats on porngraph miss some percentage of the traffic. This has many different reasons which would be a huge post I do not want to bore you with ;)

BUT the uniques/hits stats we provide AND also things like Country Stats and the like are ACCURATE.

I would love to help resolve this issue since I do not want a bug in our code (although I doubt there is one) to cause something like this. Thus, if you can help to test what causes this big difference in hit stats, contact me up on icq 1889711.

"Think about it a little more and you'll agree with me, because you're smart and I'm right."
- Charlie Munger
Comment
jimmyf

OU812

Join Date: Feb 2001

Posts: 12651
Share

Post
#45

12-07-2003, 11:14 AM

Originally posted by Nathan
Hi sexus,

what maxjohan is talking about is the fact that sometimes REFERRER stats on porngraph miss some percentage of the traffic. This has many different reasons which would be a huge post I do not want to bore you with ;)

BUT the uniques/hits stats we provide AND also things like Country Stats and the like are ACCURATE.

I would love to help resolve this issue since I do not want a bug in our code (although I doubt there is one) to cause something like this. Thus, if you can help to test what causes this big difference in hit stats, contact me up on icq 1889711.

Wonder if he will contact you?

Epic CashEpic Cash works for me
Solar Cash Paysite Plugin
Gallery of the day freesites,POTD,Gallery generator with free hosting
Comment
{fusion}

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 1650
Share

Post
#46

12-07-2003, 11:21 AM

Domain Name: SERVAK.BIZ
Domain ID: D2931360-BIZ
Sponsoring Registrar: GO DADDY SOFTWARE, INC.
Domain Status: ok
Registrant ID: GODA-0912534
Registrant Name: Miha Dedicov
Registrant Organization: n/a
Registrant Address1: Krizovna st, 12a
Registrant City: Kharkiv
Registrant State/Province: Not Applicable
Registrant Postal Code: 100658
Registrant Country: United Kingdom
Registrant Country Code: UK
Registrant Phone Number: +7.06562458756

are you sure your name is paul?

why do you hide all contact information if your so respected?
Comment
Nathan

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 3108
Share

Post
#47

12-07-2003, 11:23 AM

Originally posted by jimmyf

Wonder if he will contact you?

He did, talking to him now..

I'll post when I find anything.

"Think about it a little more and you'll agree with me, because you're smart and I'm right."
- Charlie Munger
Comment
Adult-biz

Service Provider

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 2139
Share

Post
#48

12-07-2003, 11:26 AM

Domain Name: SERVAK.BIZ
Domain ID: D2931360-BIZ
Sponsoring Registrar: GO DADDY SOFTWARE, INC.
Domain Status: ok
Registrant ID: GODA-0912534
Registrant Name: Miha Dedicov
Registrant Organization: n/a
Registrant Address1: Krizovna st, 12a
Registrant City: Kharkiv
Registrant State/Province: Not Applicable
Registrant Postal Code: 100658
Registrant Country: United Kingdom
Registrant Country Code: UK
Registrant Phone Number: +7.06562458756

are you sure your name is paul?

why do you hide all contact information if your so respected?

-------------------

For the record - this is my administrator for my server.
Comment
pantymaniac

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2003

Posts: 1192
Share

Post
#49

12-07-2003, 11:27 AM

bump for loosing hits

This place is for RENT
Comment
{fusion}

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 1650
Share

Post
#50

12-07-2003, 11:28 AM

+44 is uk country telephone code and that is also not a uk postal address

+7 is russia and the name looks russian
Comment

Previous 1 2 template Next

Working...