Quote:
Originally posted by DrewKole
Proposed....
" 2) A secondary producer is any person who produces, assembles,
manufactures, publishes, duplicates, reproduces, or reissues a book,
magazine, periodical, film, videotape, a computer-generated image, digital image, or picture, or other matter intended for commercial distribution that contains a visual depiction of actual sexually explicit conduct, or who inserts on a computer site or service a digital image of, or otherwise manages the content of a computer site or service that contains a visual depiction of, actual sexually explicit conduct, including any person who enters into a contract, agreement, or conspiracy to do any of the foregoing.
3) Proposed 28 CFR 75.2(a)(1) would require computer site or service
producers to maintain a ``hard'' physical or electronic copy of the actual depiction with the identification and age files, along with and linked to all accession information, such as each URL used for that depiction. This ensures that all of the data about all of the people in the depictions can be accessed to ensure that none of the people in the depictions are minors."
Looks to me, like the secondary producer as defined, in almost every case, would be the webmaster.
and in section 3, would require that they have a copy of the ids.
I'm probably reading it wrong.
|
No, You're not reading it wrong....Now go read 28 CFR 75 and learn about secondary producers as defined BY LAW...not by "regulations."
That specific law has been tried once already and when stacked up against 2257 there seems to have been enough conflict for the court to rule in our favor.
Only time will tell where this stuff ends up and just like the prior 2257 laws, one should be able to fully expect a grandfather type of clause.
In the past, I have been outspoken about actual laws that were currently on the books not laws that have not yet been written.