Using camcorder for stills?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lil2rich4u2
    ICQ: 175171926
    • Oct 2002
    • 11046

    #1

    Using camcorder for stills?

    can i get decent quality? What attributes should i look for in a camcorder if id like it to also take decent stills?

    I saw a camera on QVC where it is constantly focusing, so the SECOND you hit the button, it grabs the image. No delay for focus at all.

    this is important to me, so what should i be looking for when shopping this?

    thanks if you can help.
    HEY!!

    Unbeatable hosting! Customer service is top notch!

    --> ISPrime <-- Do a search on any board, their reputation is rock solid .. for years!!
  • juicylinks
    So Fucking Banned
    • Apr 2001
    • 122992

    #2
    I bought a facial tanner from QVC

    Comment

    • lil2rich4u2
      ICQ: 175171926
      • Oct 2002
      • 11046

      #3
      Originally posted by juicylinks
      I bought a facial tanner from QVC
      HEY!!

      Unbeatable hosting! Customer service is top notch!

      --> ISPrime <-- Do a search on any board, their reputation is rock solid .. for years!!

      Comment

      • lil2rich4u2
        ICQ: 175171926
        • Oct 2002
        • 11046

        #4
        THIS SONY looks nice

        :/

        damnit i really want one, and dont know wtf to get ... ill be shopping for 2yrs at this rate, lol

        i would have already bought it but i did that with my digital camera and regret it since there are features id like to have that it didnt come with.
        HEY!!

        Unbeatable hosting! Customer service is top notch!

        --> ISPrime <-- Do a search on any board, their reputation is rock solid .. for years!!

        Comment

        • AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE
          best designer on GFY
          • Mar 2003
          • 30307

          #5
          Basically...

          Not really.

          Comment

          • plexer
            Confirmed User
            • Oct 2002
            • 1339

            #6
            I use a GL2 and the still's come out pretty good. If your trying to get still's from the video.... No good! Could never get the same quality as a digital still camara..

            I'M FREEEEE!!!!

            Comment

            • bawdy
              Confirmed User
              • Feb 2002
              • 1424

              #7
              video is interlaced.... basically it takes one image which comprises half the total image and then another image and interlaces them... what does this mean? well anything with motion in it will get artifacts that look like jaggy little lines

              also the resolution sucks 690000 pixels on the CCD vrs 5m... big difference

              also the color space is different between the a digital stills camera and a video camera (video cameras will capture less color information especially with NTSC)

              that about sums it up

              Comment

              • doober
                Confirmed User
                • Jul 2003
                • 6984

                #8
                Originally posted by juicylinks
                I bought a facial tanner from QVC
                I knew it!!!!
                How often you use it??

                Comment

                • doober
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jul 2003
                  • 6984

                  #9
                  btw you will get very crappy pics with a 690000 pixels, thats not even one megapixel.
                  Pix will prolly be grainy at best..

                  Comment

                  • hyper
                    Confirmed User
                    • Mar 2002
                    • 5294

                    #10
                    dont use a camcorder for digital stills
                    buy a fucking digital camera

                    Comment

                    • lil2rich4u2
                      ICQ: 175171926
                      • Oct 2002
                      • 11046

                      #11
                      Originally posted by bawdy
                      video is interlaced.... basically it takes one image which comprises half the total image and then another image and interlaces them... what does this mean? well anything with motion in it will get artifacts that look like jaggy little lines

                      also the resolution sucks 690000 pixels on the CCD vrs 5m... big difference

                      also the color space is different between the a digital stills camera and a video camera (video cameras will capture less color information especially with NTSC)

                      that about sums it up
                      very nice man, thanks!

                      so your saying even if i managed to find a 5megapix camcorder, stills would still come out grainy due to the fact that each frame is interlaced. correct?

                      Is this on every camcorder? Or did i manage to choose a $700 shitty one, lol

                      Anything you can recomend in same price range?



                      Originally posted by bawdy

                      dont use a camcorder for digital stills
                      buy a fucking digital camera
                      I have one, but still want to pull stills off video.
                      HEY!!

                      Unbeatable hosting! Customer service is top notch!

                      --> ISPrime <-- Do a search on any board, their reputation is rock solid .. for years!!

                      Comment

                      • Dirty F
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Jul 2001
                        • 59204

                        #12


                        This is a screengrab. No matter what camera you will buy it will always look like this. About 640x480.

                        But lately the newer cams can make decent pictures and write it on the memory stick. I believe a buddy of mine has a sony video cam which can take likr 1600x1200 still.

                        Comment

                        • Groove
                          Confirmed User
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 3852

                          #13
                          The Sony DCR-PC330 offers the best stills:

                          http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content...der-review.htm

                          But they still suck compared to a modest dedicated stills camera.

                          Comment

                          • lil2rich4u2
                            ICQ: 175171926
                            • Oct 2002
                            • 11046

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Groove
                            The Sony DCR-PC330 offers the best stills:

                            http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content...der-review.htm

                            But they still suck compared to a modest dedicated stills camera.
                            a bit too pricey (and ugly) heh

                            but thanks for the info, it will give me some guidelines to look for when im looking at other models.


                            BTW the pic from above doesnt seem too bad ...
                            HEY!!

                            Unbeatable hosting! Customer service is top notch!

                            --> ISPrime <-- Do a search on any board, their reputation is rock solid .. for years!!

                            Comment

                            Working...