Quote:
Originally posted by tony404
Here is a question , they passed this. They grab you because some pics from a promo pack swap you dont have 2257. The model in question is in her 30's and looks it. How are they going to get a conviction? They tell the jury we are protecting children and there is the pic of the 30 yr old behind them. I cant see it , I think all the teen sites are going to have to get militant about this.
|
Interesting scenario... while the premise behind 2257 and especially the new proposed changes is to "prevent children from being used in sexually explicit production", the real intent in my observation is to use 2257 to shutdown p*rn.
So when they pick on an easy target that doesn't have any 2257 statements or records, they won't need to show the jury that the model was an adult, they just show that the webmaster failed to comply with a federal statue, thus committed a felony.
It really is scary where this is all going....something that I have been hearing from attorneys on conference panels.... and now that the Attorney General has 2257 on his agenda, it's a tool to further the agenda of removing smut.
-brandon