Micheal Moore's 9/11-Just seen it

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tempest
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • May 2004
    • 10217

    #61
    Originally posted by MikeHawk
    Dork...so easy to be a back seat second guessing driver..so sick of this ..it goes back all the way back to the Clinton Admin, they knew they were there, all other countiries had there own info, the spin that pukes like moore put on this shit make me want to throw the fuck up..just to suite there political agendas..and you eat it up..would like some salt on that bullshit...or you going to eat it raw?
    I love it when guys like you can't actually argue the point and so start all the name calling and swearing. Just try and debate the issue.

    I love Bush getting owned by the Irish reporter.. The US press are such pussies because they're afraid of getting called unpatriotic.

    Comment

    • MikeHawk
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2004
      • 6683

      #62
      Originally posted by Tempest
      I love it when guys like you can't actually argue the point and so start all the name calling and swearing. Just try and debate the issue.

      I love Bush getting owned by the Irish reporter.. The US press are such pussies because they're afraid of getting called unpatriotic.

      Gosh....you are soooo amazing.....wow!
      THE AMBUSH INTERVIEW

      Comment

      • Paul Markham
        Too old to care
        • Jun 2001
        • 52942

        #63
        Originally posted by MikeHawk
        Dork...so easy to be a back seat second guessing driver..so sick of this ..it goes back all the way back to the Clinton Admin, they knew they were there, all other countiries had there own info, the spin that pukes like moore put on this shit make me want to throw the fuck up..just to suite there political agendas..and you eat it up..would like some salt on that bullshit...or you going to eat it raw?
        Still not one fact disputing just personal attacks on the message man.

        So you come up with some facts like I did, it took all of 5 minutes, and show me I'm wrong.

        There were no WMDs at the time of invasion, there was no coalition between Saddam and Bin Laden and the invasion was on false evidence.

        Now go and prove me wrong.

        Moore is an ASS
        Its not what Fox is telling me, dont even watch Fox, its the bullshit you are eating up from entertainers like Moore. He is in the biz of making money and being an entertainer...that is all.
        I think Moore has pointed out the financial links between Bush and the Bin Ladens.

        Wonder who made the more money out of invading Iraq, moore or Bush?

        Advice, be careful of the doors you open. They might swing right back in your face.



        Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
        PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

        Comment

        • latinasojourn
          Confirmed User
          • Oct 2003
          • 3191

          #64
          Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
          Have you seen Moore's movie?

          Michael Moore strongly supports the troops - that is one of the main reasons he made the movie. What is your definition of supporting the troops - sending them to die so that Bush's family can make more money? Leaving them in Iraq forever so Bush's friends can keep making money at taxpayer expense?

          Michael Moore spent the last few years of his life making a movie to help support our troops.

          What Moore is doing, trying to get rid of Bush, will do more to support the troops than anything a loud mouth talk radio host like Rush Limbaugh will ever do.

          Keep believing what you are told by Fox and stay happy.
          have to agree.

          i support our troops, and i love america for what it stands for.

          we're supposed to be the guys in white hats. we are supposed to take the high road.

          i have no problem seeing a guy who hijacks an airplane getting his brains blown out by one of our guys.

          i have a real problem seeing an innocent child hurt or killed in this.

          a real problem with that.

          Comment

          • MikeHawk
            Confirmed User
            • Jan 2004
            • 6683

            #65
            Originally posted by charly
            Still not one fact disputing just personal attacks on the message man.

            So you come up with some facts like I did, it took all of 5 minutes, and show me I'm wrong.

            There were no WMDs at the time of invasion, there was no coalition between Saddam and Bin Laden and the invasion was on false evidence.

            Now go and prove me wrong.

            I think Moore has pointed out the financial links between Bush and the Bin Ladens.

            Wonder who made the more money out of invading Iraq, moore or Bush?

            Advice, be careful of the doors you open. They might swing right back in your face.

            So dizzy from the spin......
            Its just amazing!
            THE AMBUSH INTERVIEW

            Comment

            • Tempest
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • May 2004
              • 10217

              #66
              Originally posted by MikeHawk
              Gosh....you are soooo amazing.....wow!
              I know.. bow down and worship me as you should...

              Comment

              • the indigo
                Confirmed User
                • Sep 2001
                • 2016

                #67
                Originally posted by benc
                And you say Bush is like Hilter. It seems Moore is much closer to Hitler with his mastery of propaganda.
                ROFL

                Your *gouverment* does propaganda 365 days per year, open your eyes, god damn fuck.

                Oh and Yes I care since it affects the WORLD. The world should vote for the next american gouverment, because I'm not sure the american people are smart enough to see something else than the US propaganda (in general).

                As soon as you put out a few negative FACTS against USA, they call you un-patriotic... how dumb is that. Completely brain-washed.

                I'm gonna kill someone for the stupidity.
                "There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die." -Hunter S. Thompson

                Comment

                • baddog
                  So Fucking Banned
                  • Apr 2001
                  • 107089

                  #68
                  Originally posted by frankthetank
                  I must disagree, if it were such a powerful documentary then both sides would have been shown, instead bush was portraid as an evil mastermind who wanted this from the begining, yet fails to mention how many saddam killed, the info that bush received about iraq, and how many bin laden killed... if anything it made me pull more towards bush, and if I could vote for him if I was american I would vote for him, I am sure if I were to do a documentary on clinton looking into the camera looking stupid that wouldnt be hard to find... hell even kerry...the fact is that most of this movie was focused on making bush look stupid, hardly any facts that I havent heard before on CNN.
                  would you expect less from Moore? he would not know how to do a documentary if his life depended on it . . . . and no, I am not pro-Bush . . . I am just anti-Moore

                  Comment

                  • baddog
                    So Fucking Banned
                    • Apr 2001
                    • 107089

                    #69
                    Originally posted by the indigo


                    Oh and Yes I care since it affects the WORLD. The world should vote for the next american gouverment,
                    idiot

                    Comment

                    • baddog
                      So Fucking Banned
                      • Apr 2001
                      • 107089

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Tempest
                      umm.. So is Saudi Arabia.. Why didn't you invade?

                      The Saudi government beheads people. Why didn't you invade?

                      Again. Why didn't you invade Saudi Arabia???
                      Or how about Iran???? They're a lot worse than Iraq.. Figure it out.
                      how about because Saudi Arabia did not lose a war, and sign a treaty and violate it? and who cares how a country executes it's criminals?

                      Comment

                      • Tempest
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • May 2004
                        • 10217

                        #71
                        Originally posted by baddog
                        how about because Saudi Arabia did not lose a war, and sign a treaty and violate it? and who cares how a country executes it's criminals?
                        How about because Bush wants to control the oil. He didn't have to go into Saudi Arabia because he's friends with them already. Still haven't answered why not Iran? The whole treaty thing is the weakest excuse ever. Why do you believe that.

                        Comment

                        • baddog
                          So Fucking Banned
                          • Apr 2001
                          • 107089

                          #72
                          Originally posted by Tempest
                          How about because Bush wants to control the oil. He didn't have to go into Saudi Arabia because he's friends with them already. Still haven't answered why not Iran? The whole treaty thing is the weakest excuse ever. Why do you believe that.
                          because it is fact, if you weren't 8 years old when the treaty was signed you might know that . . . and we don't rely on Iraqi oil, never have . . . if it was about the oil our gas prices wouldn't be so fucking high

                          Comment

                          • baddog
                            So Fucking Banned
                            • Apr 2001
                            • 107089

                            #73
                            Originally posted by Tempest
                            Still haven't answered why not Iran?
                            why Iran? we did not have a war with them that they lost . . . better question, why not Canada . . it would be easier, and we could use the lumber

                            Comment

                            • Tempest
                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                              • May 2004
                              • 10217

                              #74
                              Originally posted by baddog
                              because it is fact, if you weren't 8 years old when the treaty was signed you might know that . . . and we don't rely on Iraqi oil, never have . . . if it was about the oil our gas prices wouldn't be so fucking high
                              I was probably as old as you were... no.. you don't.. but you will.. More and more of the Saudi oil is going to be going to China and you're going to need new sources... thus.. Iraq... Do you actually watch the news or make this up as you go along?

                              And of course you didn't answer my question as to why you actually believe the reason Bush went into Iraq was because of the "treaty"?

                              Comment

                              • baddog
                                So Fucking Banned
                                • Apr 2001
                                • 107089

                                #75
                                Originally posted by Tempest
                                I was probably as old as you were... no.. you don't.. but you will.. More and more of the Saudi oil is going to be going to China and you're going to need new sources... thus.. Iraq... Do you actually watch the news or make this up as you go along?

                                And of course you didn't answer my question as to why you actually believe the reason Bush went into Iraq was because of the "treaty"?
                                are you 50? I answered the questions, just because you don't like the answers does not mean they weren't answered

                                Comment

                                Working...