michael moores movies compair to a health campain telling amercians bigmacs are healthy because they have lettuce
-
-
Have I said at any point I do not support the troops?Originally posted by MikeHawk
Thats not the point...the point is as americans we must support our troops and the effort at hand. Living in the past and second guessing is for fools and people like moore.
I support our troops our efforts we are over there fighting and our guys are dieing, while you go to Starbucks and drink your coffee drinks not even knowing wtf is going on...
Wake up, the very freedom we have comes from the actions taken by a govtand our troops of the free world, support, dont tear appart...we must stand united or else we play into the hands of the very people trying to rip us apart...
Standing up for freedom by invading a helpless country, nice twist.Comment
-
Support the troops. No one EVER says not to. But don't let your support of the troops blind you to someone that may be getting them killed for all the wrong reasons. THAT should get you more pissed off than anything if it's true. Blindly following a leader who is bad for a country is exactly what happened in Germany.Originally posted by MikeHawk
Thats not the point...the point is as a americans we must support our troops and the effort at hand.Comment
-
Now we will see what the memos were based on.
US spymaster goes on the defensive
Now I suppose the BBC is biased.The focus of those questions is widening. Not only do they demand to know if politicians exaggerated the intelligence estimates to strengthen the case for war; they also demand to know whether the intelligence agencies got it right.
The administration has begun to step away from its position of certainty over the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
And the former weapons inspector David Kay has told Congress that he doesn't believe that Iraq had large stockpiles of WMD and questioned pre-war intelligence.Comment
-
I am so sick and tired of everyone talking about why we went to war in Iraq.
It seems to me we should be talking about whether any war with Iraq could have been justified.
So lets take these into consideration:
1. Iraq was a known training ground for many of the terrorist organizations acting thoughout the entire world.
2. Saddam committed human rights atrocities on the order of Hitler. Hundeds of thousands of people gassed, tortured, flayed, and murdered.
3. Sadam and the radical religion he supported condoned the kind of treatment of women that hardly any other place on earth would subject animals to. Even test animals are treated better. Have you seen the pictures of women stoned to death because they accidently showed an ankle? How about the pictures of the girl that had battery acid thrown in her face because her sister rejected a suitor. And the men/attackers are never charged!
That is just off the top of my head. I'm sorry, but as a human being, I don't care what reasons were used to justify taking out Iraq. Saddam and his sons should have been killed a long time ago.
And here is my real name because if you can same I'm wrong with my above statement then
David Satchell
DelanyDecolleur.com :: Satin and Nylon Nude Glamour ModelComment
-
Dork...so easy to be a back seat second guessing driver..so sick of this ..it goes back all the way back to the Clinton Admin, they knew they were there, all other countiries had there own info, the spin that pukes like moore put on this shit make me want to throw the fuck up..just to suite there political agendas..and you eat it up..would like some salt on that bullshit...or you going to eat it raw?Originally posted by charly
So these memos stating where the WMDs are located, were they false or lies and why was no evidence produced to back them up.
And why were they not shown to the Weapons Inspectors?
As I said, they were pieces of paper and little else, with NO EVIDENCE WHAT SO EVER TO BACK THEM UP.
Even George Tenet thinks Bush drew the wrong conclusions for the memos.
As I said, the memos were enough to go find the proof, not start a war. History will judge Bush.Last edited by MikeHawk; 06-25-2004, 11:02 PM.Comment
-
Have you seen Moore's movie?Originally posted by MikeHawk
...the point is as a americans we must support our troops and the effort at hand. Living in the past and second guessing is for fools and people like moore.
Michael Moore strongly supports the troops - that is one of the main reasons he made the movie. What is your definition of supporting the troops - sending them to die so that Bush's family can make more money? Leaving them in Iraq forever so Bush's friends can keep making money at taxpayer expense?
Michael Moore spent the last few years of his life making a movie to help support our troops.
What Moore is doing, trying to get rid of Bush, will do more to support the troops than anything a loud mouth talk radio host like Rush Limbaugh will ever do.
Keep believing what you are told by Fox and stay happy.
Last edited by Mr.Fiction; 06-25-2004, 11:02 PM.Comment
-
I think the real facts won't be known for years to come. Too many people are pissed off on both sides that they can't get past their opinions and feelings on the matter and deal with cold hard facts. It makes it tough to filter all the crap from the facts.Originally posted by frankthetank
I was just very dissapointed with this movie, because I thought I was going to be presented with more facts then I already knew which did not happen.Comment
-
Support the troops, Bin Laden, 9/11, are all attempts to side track the debate.Originally posted by Tempest
Support the troops. No one EVER says not to. But don't let your support of the troops blind you to someone that may be getting them killed for all the wrong reasons. THAT should get you more pissed off than anything if it's true. Blindly following a leader who is bad for a country is exactly what happened in Germany.
So far no one has come up with one single counter argument to the film. The best they can do is point a finger and say Moore is biased.
This debate is very one sided so far.Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
Have you seen Moore's movie?
Michael Moore strongly supports the troops - that is one of the main reasons he made the movie. What is your definition of supporting the troops - sending them to die so that Bush's family can make more money? Leaving them in Iraq forever so Bush's friends can keep making money at taxpayer expense?
Michael Moore spent the last few years of his life making a movie to help support our troops.
What Moore is doing, trying to get rid of Bush, will do more to support the troops than anything a loud mouth talk radio host like Rush Limbaugh will ever do.
Keep believing what you are told by Fox and stay happy.
Moore is an ASS
Its not what Fox is telling me, dont even watch Fox, its the bullshit you are eating up from entertainers like Moore. He is in the biz of making money and being an entertainer...that is all.Comment
-
if you wanna support troops, vote Bush out of the officeOriginally posted by MikeHawk
Thats not the point...the point is as americans we must support our troops and the effort at hand. Living in the past and second guessing is for fools and people like moore.
I support our troops our efforts we are over there fighting and our guys are dieing, while you go to Starbucks and drink your coffee drinks not even knowing wtf is going on...
Wake up, the very freedom we have comes from the actions taken by a govtand our troops of the free world, support, dont tear appart...we must stand united or else we play into the hands of the very people trying to rip us apart...
;-)!;-)!;-)!;-)!;-)!;-)!;-)!;-)!;-)!;-)!;-)Comment
-
Our troops get paid too - does that make everything they do worthless?Originally posted by MikeHawk
Moore is an ASS
Its not what Fox is telling me, dont even watch Fox, its the bullshit you are eating up from entertainers like Moore. He is in the biz of making money and being an entertainer...that is all.
Try again.
Comment
-
umm.. So is Saudi Arabia.. Why didn't you invade?Originally posted by dsatchell
1. Iraq was a known training ground for many of the terrorist organizations acting thoughout the entire world.
The Saudi government beheads people. Why didn't you invade?Originally posted by dsatchell
2. Saddam committed human rights atrocities on the order of Hitler. Hundeds of thousands of people gassed, tortured, flayed, and murdered.
Again. Why didn't you invade Saudi Arabia???Originally posted by dsatchell
3. Sadam and the radical religion he supported condoned the kind of treatment of women that hardly any other place on earth would subject animals to.
Or how about Iran???? They're a lot worse than Iraq.. Figure it out.Comment
-
Originally posted by M_M
if you wanna support troops, vote Bush out of the office
Yeah ....that will fix it right up... POOF make it all better...dream on...are you kidding? Wake up..no matter who takes office what the fuck are they going to do? Come on now.Comment
-
Wow..you really got me.. you are so smart.....damn...Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
Our troops get paid too - does that make everything they do worthless?
Try again.
Comment
Comment