GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - Micheal Moore's 9/11-Just seen it

frankthetank · 06-25-2004, 11:16 PM

[QUOTE]Originally posted by charly
[B]What you have to do with all things like this is look at the message and the message carrier.

Has Bush disputed any of the statements put out in the film?

I am not sure, the film was just released today and I have been getting drunk

Is Michael Moore biased?

YES, where is the other side...?

Who has been proven to be the more truthful?

Not too sure, do not no either moore or bush very much but I know the film I paid $10 for today was biased

Who has the power to do the more damage?

I imagine bush would have more power

It's no good to just dismiss Moore becasue he's biased, that's a very American thing to do. Just because the message carrier is criticising it does not follow he is lying or hates the US. You have to prove these facts.

So far what has been shown is the war was started on the false premise that Saddam's Iraq was a threat to the US.

Where is the proof Saddam was supporting terrorism against the US. Yes he was vocal against the US, but other than that what proof is there?

If the CIA gave me memos saying he was I would believe them...

Where is the proof he was in league with Bin Laden?

CIA memos

No one so far has been able to come up with proof that WMD existed at the time of the invasion.

If I was told that saddam was carrying WMD and I already knew that he was a mad man I would have done the same thing

Going to war, invading and occupying a country, killing hundeds of thousands, spending billions of dollars needs a little more proof and a lot less assumptions than we were given.

Who would you rather trust, Bush or Moore as the most truthful?

running a presidency is pretty powerful and there will always be critics but making a film of how bush is unintelligent is just messed up, I watched more then 60 minutes of bush and company staring into the camera without knowledge they would be shown to the world, if I had have know that I wouldnt have paid $10 for.

06-25-2004, 11:16 PM
frankthetank Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 616	[QUOTE]Originally posted by charly [B]What you have to do with all things like this is look at the message and the message carrier. Has Bush disputed any of the statements put out in the film? I am not sure, the film was just released today and I have been getting drunk Is Michael Moore biased? YES, where is the other side...? Who has been proven to be the more truthful? Not too sure, do not no either moore or bush very much but I know the film I paid $10 for today was biased Who has the power to do the more damage? I imagine bush would have more power It's no good to just dismiss Moore becasue he's biased, that's a very American thing to do. Just because the message carrier is criticising it does not follow he is lying or hates the US. You have to prove these facts. So far what has been shown is the war was started on the false premise that Saddam's Iraq was a threat to the US. Where is the proof Saddam was supporting terrorism against the US. Yes he was vocal against the US, but other than that what proof is there? If the CIA gave me memos saying he was I would believe them... Where is the proof he was in league with Bin Laden? CIA memos No one so far has been able to come up with proof that WMD existed at the time of the invasion. If I was told that saddam was carrying WMD and I already knew that he was a mad man I would have done the same thing Going to war, invading and occupying a country, killing hundeds of thousands, spending billions of dollars needs a little more proof and a lot less assumptions than we were given. Who would you rather trust, Bush or Moore as the most truthful? running a presidency is pretty powerful and there will always be critics but making a film of how bush is unintelligent is just messed up, I watched more then 60 minutes of bush and company staring into the camera without knowledge they would be shown to the world, if I had have know that I wouldnt have paid $10 for.