Quote:
Originally posted by Rich
You're information is not good enough because you're getting it from a US influenced editorial page that I've read a long time about. I know all about the militant rebels and their claims, thank you. When you back comments up with more than rhetoric, people may start taking you seriously.
Does it matter where you get your information from? Yes, especially when it's wrong.
Based on your comments in this thread, I'd speculate that I've probably read more about Haiti then you've actually read about everything combined in your life, Fox and CNN tickers not included. Smart people find out all the information they can about something and then form and opinion, morons search google for the first biased editorial they can find that agrees with them and then talk about it like it somehow makes them right. You have no clue about Haiti, and you're proving it more with every post. I visit the Dominican and Cuba each once a year, and I've been reading about the culture and politics of the region for years. Do you have any idea who Yves Isidor is? You probably should have at least SOME idea before you start taking his word as fact on world issues.
Has anyone every doubted that Iraq has support terrorism in the past? You're posting shit most people have known for years. The questions are a) the lies about his connection to Osama, and b) the lies about WMD. Iraq was invaded because it was an imminent threat, remember? Not some vague terrorist sponsoring state.
If you're going to invade every country that has sponsored terrorism over the years, you're going to have to do a hell of a lot better then 1 a year. Start with yourselves, after all Reagan funded and trained Bin Laden. The Spanish people really owe you one for that.
|
Granted I don't know much about Haiti but you know 0 about me, my education level or my reading habits so the rest is just your opinion which you are entitled to.
How do you know the information posted on those sites are false? Can you prove the opposite or is it just your opinion. First off I read a lot about many different issues around the globe, granted I dont lead alot about Haiti but of course you picked the Haiti stuff out of this entire thread, thats cool, good for you.
So because Saddam was a sponsor of Terrorism but not Al Qaeda it still doesnt make our invasion substantial. There are conflicting reports that say Saddam was sponsoring Al-Qaeda. Your or I don't know the truth of that yet, nor will be ever know the real truth. So much shit happens in this and other countries that we all do not know about.
Reagan may have sponsored Bin Laden but our past president let Bin Laden go as well this is not just a bush issue.
http://www.infowars.com/saved%20page..._bin_laden.htm
I wont even debate you on Haiti as I dont know enough about it to debate you properly on it, and I am man enough to admit that , but that was also not the point of my thread. It was to point out that Saddam Hussein and the war in Iraq is justified.