Why is it whenever someone provides you proof to counter your information its not good enough? I posted a large majority of information regarding Saddams link to Terrorism. Then I mention Aristide (yes I knew his name but didnt bother looking up the spelling before the first post) and I provide you information that the man was known for killing Haitians its still not good enough for you.
Does it matter where I get the information from? Does my information become less valid if its the #1 result on google? I guess if thats true many of us in the porn industry wouldn't make any sales being in the #1 slot on google for a search term.
Funny how you are interestingly silent on the Saddam links to Terrorism.