Quote:
Originally posted by Tom_PM
Well ok then I get your point. I think another good point is that he's being a realist. Hopefully alot of us are trying to be realists, while being optimistic as well.
I think the argument can easily be made that just because someone supports a war effort *after* the war effort has begun, it doesnt mean that they think it was the best option on the table.
I think an awful lot of folks never ruled *out* the possibility of using force in Iraq. But an awful lot of those folks didnt think it was such a "front burner" option as this administration did.
Nothing wrong with that.
|
I personally do not think it was a "front burner" option...but I do approve of the take down of Saddam and the Baath party...and I have stated multiple times my only complaint is that we waited so long to do it. I would have acted within the 1st year of the "cease fire" agreements.