Quote:
Originally posted by goBigtime
Ah...
So for Clinton, you want to "accept the man at his word", implying he is a damn liar if he's dancing around his feelings on the war.. err sorry, we're not at war -- the 'thing' in Iraq.
|
"Implying"...is your take...not mine.
Quote:
|
However you don't want to call allmighty Bush on his word, or his administrations word that has been broken countless times since they, took office (literally).
|
You are mistaken.
Quote:
Not that their word is worth a shit - or any other politician for that matter - Clinton included. It's part of Politicis 101 -- The art of lying.
Why not just admit that you are clinging a little to tightly to Clinton's use and timing of the the word "support" and call it a day with this thread. 
|
As I have stated...President Clinton...has made similar statements in the past about the invasion...so I am not "clinging" to the word "support" or any other word. Overall...President Clinton has made it clear in the past...and once again has made it clear... that he is not against the invasion of Iraq in general.