I'm gonna go with "it doesn't matter." I've never seen an uncut one so I don't really have anything to compare with, but I don't think I'd care one way or the other. As long as it's not attached to an idiot, I'm good.
Originally posted by Holly I'm gonna go with "it doesn't matter." I've never seen an uncut one so I don't really have anything to compare with, but I don't think I'd care one way or the other. As long as it's not attached to an idiot, I'm good.
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
Originally posted by digi Is there a diffrence for girls? I mean, if you pull back the skin on an uncut dick it looks like a cut one?
Easier entry for uncircumsized because the foreskin acts as a 'slide mechanism' ... mind you if you've done your job right there should be plenty of lubrication already...
Originally posted by PrivateIvy yes, but the thoughts of what might be hiding in there don't make that appealing
Ivy
Would you have sex with someone who has a STD? Likely not... so you're prejudice and assume people can't clean themselves? Ever hear of a yeast infection? There's a notion (started by people who are circumsized) that being uncircumsized is 'dirty' / a bad thing, maybe to make themselves feel better or superior, but there's really no logic or facts behind it.
TRUE - If you don't clean yourself, of course your going to have shit growing - but that's true with women, men, if you don't take care of yourself, you'll be dirty, stinky, and have things growing.
Okay, so roll the foreskin back past the 'lip' of the head, and voila.. plus that guy doesn't look fully hard.. and unless he has huge hands - he has a small penis compared to me anyways, have no other comparison.
Originally posted by Nysus Would you have sex with someone who has a STD? Likely not... so you're prejudice and assume people can't clean themselves? Ever hear of a yeast infection? There's a notion (started by people who are circumsized) that being uncircumsized is 'dirty' / a bad thing, maybe to make themselves feel better or superior, but there's really no logic or facts behind it.
TRUE - If you don't clean yourself, of course your going to have shit growing - but that's true with women, men, if you don't take care of yourself, you'll be dirty, stinky, and have things growing.
Cheers,
Matt
Just stating my opinion..I like shaved girlies and circumsized penises..... that's just what I prefer
I do not like body hair on genitals-male or female
and I much prefer circumsized penis
Not trying to offend anyone...just my personal opinion and preference
I've been with both. Cut is much better. Cleaner. If a girl likes to pull the skin back and find nice white cheesy smegma to slurp on, then let her lick it off. yuk. A girl is more prone to get infections and cervical cancer from uncut.
My bad. I wasn't very clear with my post. I've "seen" them before, in pics and stuff. But never in real life or up close. I guess I was talking about "seen" in the "biblical sense". ;-}
Although, on occasion I do have to stare at them awful hard when I'm fooling with content because sometimes when they're all excited and happy, I can't tell if they're circumcised or not. The people on my ICQ list love getting urls from me asking, "Is this dick cut?" Esp. the guys.
Threads like this are sad. Girls encouraging gential mutilation.
Listen bitches. Guys are idiots. They are obsessed with their penises. They will do whatever they think girls want. So go do some research, and excercise some compassion/empathy, before throwing in your support for cutting off body parts.
It's not like getting a haircut or cutting your nails. It's nerves and flesh. It protects the head when not having sex (so it doesnt get rubbed raw on clothes, roughening/hardnening the tip), and provides stimulation (half the penises nerves are in the foreskin). Would you like someone to cut off all the excess tissue around your vagina because you can't be trusted to 'keep yourself clean'?
Circumcision started for one reason: to decrease sensitivity in an attempt to discourage masturbation, because 'god' considers sexuality to be 'unclean'. Of course, guys can still function without it.. like a man who is blind in one eye can still read.
Guys don't want to feel like victims. They don't want to face the reality that, when they were helpless babies, the people who were supposed to protect them instead mutilated them. It's too disturbing to even think about. So they invent justifications. It's a normal human reaction to abuse. But it becomes a cruel cycle, with men wanting their sons to look like their fathers.
Like men who were molested, more often molest their own kids.
Like men who were smacked around, more often smack around their own kids.
To break the cycle, it usually requires others to intervene. To say 'STOP!'.
btw - when erect/upright, the foreskin retracts, and most girls could not tell the difference. unless the circumcision went wrong (very common) in which case men get scarring, or penises than turn at wierd angles, or other deformities than can make it difficult to function at all. In action, circumcised men miss out on the 'gliding' motion that provides additional pleasure.
Why not just slice off the clitoral hood while you're at it. Having a preference is one thing, but spreading a bunch of misinformation is another thing entirely.
I can't believe how many chicks think that every uncut cock has some kind of infection. The vast majority of men know how to clean their penises. It's a rather simple process.
I've only ever had sex with one guy, and he's uncut. I have seen a few cut ones up close, but don't see how it could make that much difference in the long run.
Comment