lets say I use PHP instead of tables...
if I use PHP instead of FRAMES! (not tables)
will I get better SE rankings?
or is it just best if I recopy the complete code on every page?
will I get better SE rankings?
or is it just best if I recopy the complete code on every page?
-
Last edited by Guest; 10-25-2003, 11:53 AM. -
No.
Use the .shtml extension instead
-
-
How does that help?Originally posted by Stud Money
No.
Use the .shtml extension instead
Comment
-
PHP instead of tables?
/(bb|[^b]{2})/Comment
-
Why dont you try it and find out, what am i your fucking school teacher?Originally posted by Ross
How does that help?
Comment
-
FUCKOriginally posted by punkworld
PHP instead of tables?
I meant FRAMES!!!
PHP instead of frames!Comment
-
Have I fucked you? If not then no you are not my school teacherOriginally posted by Stud Money
Why dont you try it and find out, what am i your fucking school teacher?
I can' try it and find out if I dunno why it will help...Comment
-
i guess it depends on what youre trying to accomplish?Originally posted by bdjuf
FUCK
I meant FRAMES!!!
PHP instead of frames!the revolution is coming.Comment
-
the same website with a better SE listingOriginally posted by Dawgy
i guess it depends on what youre trying to accomplish?
Comment
-
Use .shtml extensions insteadOriginally posted by bdjuf
the same website with a better SE listing
Comment
-
Frames generally don't work really well for search engines, if you don't know what you're doing./(bb|[^b]{2})/Comment
-
exactly why I dont want to use themOriginally posted by punkworld
Frames generally don't work really well for search engines, if you don't know what you're doing.
say I use PHP instead of using frames, will it pass alot better on SEs?
if not, does that mean that I should just recopy the code(for example, the left menu bar) on all the pages?Comment
-
to my knowlede, google is perfectly happy spidering .php files as well as .shtml files, so in that respect it doesn't matter if you use shtml or php to dynamically build portions of your site without using frames.
However, do be careful about using request parameters e.g. mydomain.com/file.php?NAME=VALUE&NAME2=VALUE2&etc.
thats where the spiders start to lose you sometimes.
icq:159548293Comment
-
just what I wanted to hear, thanx alot dudeOriginally posted by gornyhuy
to my knowlede, google is perfectly happy spidering .php files as well as .shtml files, so in that respect it doesn't matter if you use shtml or php to dynamically build portions of your site without using frames.
However, do be careful about using request parameters e.g. mydomain.com/file.php?NAME=VALUE&NAME2=VALUE2&etc.
thats where the spiders start to lose you sometimes.
Comment
-
That's why they see mydomain.com/blegh/value/value2/Originally posted by gornyhuy
to my knowlede, google is perfectly happy spidering .php files as well as .shtml files, so in that respect it doesn't matter if you use shtml or php to dynamically build portions of your site without using frames.
However, do be careful about using request parameters e.g. mydomain.com/file.php?NAME=VALUE&NAME2=VALUE2&etc.
thats where the spiders start to lose you sometimes.
/(bb|[^b]{2})/Comment
-
Hence why he should use .shtml extensions with SSI calls for the dynamic areasOriginally posted by gornyhuy
However, do be careful about using request parameters e.g. mydomain.com/file.php?NAME=VALUE&NAME2=VALUE2&etc.
thats where the spiders start to lose you sometimes.
Comment
-
Ehm... no?!Originally posted by Stud Money
Hence why he should use .shtml extensions with SSI calls for the dynamic areas
/(bb|[^b]{2})/Comment
-
Just change it over to php and try to avoid using frames.Comment
-
just keep in mind that google likes TEXT more than CODE.Comment
Comment