Patent law - prior art - patent review

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Scootermuze
    Confirmed User
    • Dec 2001
    • 4513

    #1

    Patent law - prior art - patent review

    Sec. 302. - Request for reexamination
    Any person at any time may file a request for reexamination by the Office of any claim of a patent on the basis of any prior art cited under the provisions of section 301 of this title. The request must be in writing and must be accompanied by payment of a reexamination fee established by the Director pursuant to the provisions of section 41 of this title. The request must set forth the pertinency and manner of applying cited prior art to every claim for which reexamination is requested. Unless the requesting person is the owner of the patent, the Director promptly will send a copy of the request to the owner of record of the patent.

    Ref:

    Submitting these prior art discoveries could just get Acacia's patents flushed down the toilet by the patent office..
  • Stud Money
    So Fucking Banned
    • Sep 2003
    • 3214

    #2
    No.

    Comment

    • LadyMischief
      Orgasms N Such!
      • Sep 2002
      • 18135

      #3
      If they got inundated with a ton of different requests, perhaps all citing prior art, that would flush acacia's chances damn fast.

      ICQ 3522039
      Content Manager - orgasm.com
      [email protected]

      Comment

      • Mr.Fiction
        Confirmed User
        • Feb 2002
        • 9484

        #4
        What if every person who Acacia sent a letter to were to request a review of the patent?
        Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

        Comment

        • JDog
          Confirmed User
          • Feb 2003
          • 7453

          #5
          I have one my guys looking for more prior art. He's been around for over 25 years in the programming area! And remembers old skool shit on newsgroups, just gotta find it!

          jDoG
          NSCash now powering ReelProfits.com
          ALSO FEATURING: NSCash.com :: SoloDollars.com :: ReelProfits.com :: BiminiBucks.com :: VOD
          PROGRAMS COMING SOON: Greedy Bucks :: Vengeance Cash
          NOW OFFERING OVER 60 SITES
          CONTACT :: JAMES SMITH :: CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER :: ICQ (711385133)

          Comment

          • Zayne E.
            Confirmed User
            • Apr 2002
            • 1383

            #6
            Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
            What if every person who Acacia sent a letter to were to request a review of the patent?
            Fuck the "what if" - change it to "why doesn't"

            Comment

            • Scootermuze
              Confirmed User
              • Dec 2001
              • 4513

              #7
              Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
              What if every person who Acacia sent a letter to were to request a review of the patent?
              It sure would make the patent office a chuck o' change in
              reexamination fees..

              Comment

              • JDog
                Confirmed User
                • Feb 2003
                • 7453

                #8
                Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
                What if every person who Acacia sent a letter to were to request a review of the patent?
                I dont' know. I'm going to, once I get my letter! Fuck em, they don't deserve the money!

                jDoG
                NSCash now powering ReelProfits.com
                ALSO FEATURING: NSCash.com :: SoloDollars.com :: ReelProfits.com :: BiminiBucks.com :: VOD
                PROGRAMS COMING SOON: Greedy Bucks :: Vengeance Cash
                NOW OFFERING OVER 60 SITES
                CONTACT :: JAMES SMITH :: CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER :: ICQ (711385133)

                Comment

                • ravener
                  Registered User
                  • Aug 2003
                  • 76

                  #9
                  Go for it!


                  But understand it might take 1 or 2 years before the patent office gets around to scheduling a hearing.

                  The patent office owns the patent on procrastination!

                  Comment

                  • KRL
                    Entrepreneur
                    • Oct 2002
                    • 31429

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
                    What if every person who Acacia sent a letter to were to request a review of the patent?
                    If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
                    from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!

                    *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
                    Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains

                    Comment

                    • icedemon
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 1022

                      #11
                      From what I heard (so in other words, I'm not sure), if there is a court battle involving the patent, the patent office won't do anything in case it conflicts with the judges decision. So like if the judge said the patent is no good and the patent office says it is from all this prior art, then there can be a problem. I would wait to see what happens in court first, cause I don't think the patent office can do anything about it at this time.
                      Clips4Sale.com

                      Comment

                      • ravener
                        Registered User
                        • Aug 2003
                        • 76

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
                        What if every person who Acacia sent a letter to were to request a review of the patent?
                        You have to have a patent lawyer file for you. The fees are around $1500 to the USPTO, plus the legal fees.

                        Hmmm... $1500. Sound familiar?

                        Comment

                        • ravener
                          Registered User
                          • Aug 2003
                          • 76

                          #13
                          Originally posted by icedemon
                          From what I heard (so in other words, I'm not sure), if there is a court battle involving the patent, the patent office won't do anything in case it conflicts with the judges decision. So like if the judge said the patent is no good and the patent office says it is from all this prior art, then there can be a problem. I would wait to see what happens in court first, cause I don't think the patent office can do anything about it at this time.
                          That's not true. Any patent that's worth anything to anyone is always being litigated.

                          The patent office is in a world of their own. And that's the real problem!!

                          Comment

                          Working...