They are a great company I know but i was wondering how they have the rights to post pictures of people without permission not flamming or trying to start anything just wondering 
.
Thanks
. Thanks
-
Yes they do, the pictures they post are all from 'public domain' which we all know exists
-
Comment
-
gotcha .. i think :POriginally posted by Stud Money
Yes they do, the pictures they post are all from 'public domain' which we all know exists
Comment
-
You should ask JMM about that one.
PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price!
sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144Comment
-
In general, if a person is in public on government owned property, their photograph or video can be used without their consent. This is my understanding of US Law.Originally posted by JupZChris
They are a great company I know but i was wondering how they have the rights to post pictures of people without permission not flamming or trying to start anything just wondering.
Thanks
The base assumption seems to be that if you are out in public you have no right to privacy.
If someone is in a public building , the owner of that building can choose to grant a license for pictures of those inside the building.
There are many details, and celebrities have certain more rights than commonors, but in general, if you're in public, your picure is owned by he who snaps it.
See also: Paparazzi
-MLVComment
-
Go to this page on their site, it explains it.
http://www.consumptionjunction.com/s...ubmissions.aspComment
-
Comment