I didnt get a chance to see it.. did arnold speak?
Californians that watched the debate tonight provide your thinking
Collapse
X
-
id vote for arnold because he has the best chance to win, but mclintock is pretty impressive.
Busamante is the only other viable candidate, but hes part of the problem of why their is a recall in the first place.Ever notice that pretty much everything added to the Constitution after the original was a mistake. -
Californians that watched the debate tonight provide your thinking
Well...what is your thinking about the debate tonight? Who impressed you the most...who presented the best plans for dealing with the issues that were presented?When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
-
Yes.Originally posted by Rinaldo
I didnt get a chance to see it.. did arnold speak?When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
I goto Vote for Davis.
If Arnold was not Republican I would prolly vote for em, but at this point the Republican Party clearly has not got The American People in mind these days.
I have little doubt that Arnold would actually do a good job, but California would face alot of problems with the Republican Party running the show and Arnold having to take bribes to create laws that would hurt the foundations of California.

NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo!
| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily
| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 |ICQ: 78943384 |Comment
-
I agree Mclintock has my vote i think, too bad uberof dropped out.Originally posted by rooster
id vote for arnold because he has the best chance to win, but mclintock is pretty impressive.
Busamante is the only other viable candidate, but hes part of the problem of why their is a recall in the first place.Comment
-
Arnold was dropping faster than the panties of a freshman coed at her first frat party, but tonight will bring him to a new low, I am sure.Originally posted by rooster
id vote for arnold because he has the best chance to win,
McLintock, well, at least you know where he stands, but he does not stand a chance.
They should have these every night with 5 different candidates until all 130+ were shown on TV, that would insure the the recall was defeated.Comment
-
When did you first realize you were obsessed with politics?Originally posted by theking
Well...what is your thinking about the debate tonight? Who impressed you the most...who presented the best plans for dealing with the issues that were presented?Comment
-
Originally posted by jimmyf
arianna= airhead, I was agree with
She is nationally syndicated columnist and author of nine books, two were best sellers and graduated from Cambridge University with an M.A. in Economics. What does your bio look like lol.Comment
-
Her comment that people are not leaving California is BULLSHIT.
I called Uhaul a few weeks ago to try and rent a trailer to pull a car. I was told there are very few in the area since everyone is leaving California and no one is moving back with the uhauls etc..http://nakedlunchnews.comWhat's up ? Naked Lunch News !Comment
-
shut the fuck upOriginally posted by baddog
Honeyslut = clueless airheadhttp://nakedlunchnews.comWhat's up ? Naked Lunch News !Comment
-
and I can name off a list of doctors who never found my husband's brain tumor the last 10 years..Originally posted by tony404
She is nationally syndicated columnist and author of nine books, two were best sellers and graduated from Cambridge University with an M.A. in Economics. What does your bio look like lol.
http://nakedlunchnews.comWhat's up ? Naked Lunch News !Comment
-
Probably because they're afraid Arnold might win.Originally posted by Honeyslut
I called Uhaul a few weeks ago to try and rent a trailer to pull a car. I was told there are very few in the area since everyone is leaving California and no one is moving back with the uhauls etc..
Comment
-
damn you are dumb.. . . . sure, people move every fucking day . . . .however, more people move in.Originally posted by Honeyslut
Her comment that people are not leaving California is BULLSHIT.
I called Uhaul a few weeks ago to try and rent a trailer to pull a car. I was told there are very few in the area since everyone is leaving California and no one is moving back with the uhauls etc..
Why do people move? because property is so expensive. Why is property so expensive? Because more people want to buy homes than there are homes to buy.
Now, if you want to move out of the state I will find a truck for you.
And for the record, a friend of mine just moved from San Jose to LA, with a U-Haul truck.
I am glad you are getting a pulse on the status of the state from the guy at U-Haul.Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
Probably because they're afraid Arnold might win.
LOLhttp://nakedlunchnews.comWhat's up ? Naked Lunch News !Comment
-
I think you better do some research on more people moving to the state..Originally posted by baddog
damn you are dumb.. . . . sure, people move every fucking day . . . .however, more people move in.
Why do people move? because property is so expensive. Why is property so expensive? Because more people want to buy homes than there are homes to buy.
Now, if you want to move out of the state I will find a truck for you.
And for the record, a friend of mine just moved from San Jose to LA, with a U-Haul truck.
I am glad you are getting a pulse on the status of the state from the guy at U-Haul.
Keep talking out your ass
LOL..http://nakedlunchnews.comWhat's up ? Naked Lunch News !Comment
-
I would hardly call her an airhead, she had Arnold on the ropes so fast it made the entire debate entertaining. He was an ass, trying to talk over everyone else, just because he was the biggest guy on the stage.Originally posted by jimmyf
arianna= airhead, I was agree with
He lost a lot of votes tonightComment
-
Consider that by 2035, California's population will approximately double to 64 million, if current population growth continues! This projection is based on the state's current 2% annual growth rate -- a rate that is greater than the national growth rate of 1.1%Originally posted by Honeyslut
I think you better do some research on more people moving to the state..
Keep talking out your ass
LOL..Comment
-
http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2003/08/04/daily20.htmlOriginally posted by baddog
Consider that by 2035, California's population will approximately double to 64 million, if current population growth continues! This projection is based on the state's current 2% annual growth rate -- a rate that is greater than the national growth rate of 1.1%
Here ya go smartie pantshttp://nakedlunchnews.comWhat's up ? Naked Lunch News !Comment
-
I guess I misunderstood...I did not think it was a brain tumor. Is it operable...if not what treatment is he undergoing? I am confused.Originally posted by Honeyslut
and I can name off a list of doctors who never found my husband's brain tumor the last 10 years..
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
For the first time since the federal government began tracking such things, more people have moved out of California to other states than have arrived from the other 49. The moving vans headed east and north represented a net of 775,000 people who gave up on California, according to reports Wednesday from the Census Bureau.Originally posted by Honeyslut
http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2003/08/04/daily20.html
Here ya go smartie pantshttp://nakedlunchnews.comWhat's up ? Naked Lunch News !Comment
-
According to the state of California?s Demographic Division of the Department of Finance, the state?s population was estimated to be 29,828,000 July 1, 1990. It rose to an estimated 34,036,000 in 2000. Thus the population increased by 4,208,000 between July 1, 1990 and July 1, 2000.1To gain a better perspective on the meaning of this number, consider the fact that all the northeastern states from Maine to Virginia, combined, gained less than 4 million people over the same period.Comment
-
Pituitary tumor in gland which is at the base of the brain.Originally posted by theking
I guess I misunderstood...I did not think it was a brain tumor. Is it operable...if not what treatment is he undergoing? I am confused.
Close enough and fucks him up the same way..http://nakedlunchnews.comWhat's up ? Naked Lunch News !Comment
-
I am talking about NOW not 2 to 10 years ago.Gez .Originally posted by baddog
According to the state of California?s Demographic Division of the Department of Finance, the state?s population was estimated to be 29,828,000 July 1, 1990. It rose to an estimated 34,036,000 in 2000. Thus the population increased by 4,208,000 between July 1, 1990 and July 1, 2000.1To gain a better perspective on the meaning of this number, consider the fact that all the northeastern states from Maine to Virginia, combined, gained less than 4 million people over the same period.http://nakedlunchnews.comWhat's up ? Naked Lunch News !Comment
-
So, more people move here from other countries, and transplants move out to the desert. Why? Because property is cheap out there. I do hope you are planning on joining them. I will help, I promise.Originally posted by Honeyslut
For the first time since the federal government began tracking such things, more people have moved out of California to other states than have arrived from the other 49. The moving vans headed east and north represented a net of 775,000 people who gave up on California, according to reports Wednesday from the Census Bureau.Comment
-
Consider that by 2035, California's population will approximately double to 64 million, if current population growth continues! This projection is based on the state's current 2% annual growth rate -- a rate that is greater than the national growth rate of 1.1%Originally posted by Honeyslut
I am talking about NOW not 2 to 10 years ago.Gez .
just one question, do you have a problem with people moving out of CA? I sure don't.Comment
-
Whocares if they leave. I just proving I am not talking out my ASS
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm..._census06.html
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...sus-lede_x.htm
http://nakedlunchnews.comWhat's up ? Naked Lunch News !Comment
-
My place is going to be worth a million when I am done with it..Originally posted by baddog
So, more people move here from other countries, and transplants move out to the desert. Why? Because property is cheap out there. I do hope you are planning on joining them. I will help, I promise.
I am here to stay unless I get a 2nd place in Tahoe..
http://nakedlunchnews.comWhat's up ? Naked Lunch News !Comment
-
okay, now let's stop and think here. If everyone is leaving the state, your property value will drop, because it becomes a buyers market.Originally posted by Honeyslut
My place is going to be worth a million when I am done with it..
I am here to stay unless I get a 2nd place in Tahoe..
But when there are more people than homes, then it becomes a sellers market and prices go up. And it does not matter what kind of remodeling you do to it. If no one is here to buy it, it will decrease in value.
See how that works? More people are moving in than are moving out. It does not matter where they are moving from.Comment
-
from your own article:Originally posted by Honeyslut
Whocares if they leave. I just proving I am not talking out my ASS
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm..._census06.html
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...sus-lede_x.htm
Spurred by immigration, however, California's population still rose 14 percent, or 4.1 million people, between 1990 and 2000 to nearly 33.9 million. Its foreign-born population rose by more than one-third to almost 8.9 million.
More people are moving in, than are moving out.Comment
-
About 2.2 million people left California in the late 1990s, when the state was reeling from a series of tumultuous events, including earthquakes, race riots, economic downturns, a wave of foreign immigration and skyrocketing housing prices.
So, blame the dot com issue on Wilson/Bush - blame the earthquakes on Davis . . . . oh, that was Wilson too, wasn't it?Comment
-

Comment