fiddy!
-
-
Damn and the leaders of the US call the news media in the US they are all Revisionist History writers!
Fucking cock sucking leaders of this country are gonna be the death to us all, especially after we all have emptied our pockets for them.
NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo!
| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily
| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 |ICQ: 78943384 |Comment
-
Well if your 'non scrollin'-out of context-takin' ass had read the original response that was quoted you'ld have seen to what it was in response to.Originally posted by playa
What does the constitution have to do with what kind of religous background this country is?
Have you ever read the constituion? it has numerous reference about the christian religion. The bill of rights was based on man's "GOD given right" to live in a country.Comment
-
Well considering the shit jumping off out here in California I can see why!Originally posted by AlienQ
Damn and the leaders of the US call the news media in the US they are all Revisionist History writers!
Fucking cock sucking leaders of this country are gonna be the death to us all, especially after we all have emptied our pockets for them.
This state is going to shit faster than a cowfield after slop time.
If Bustamonte wins I'm packin' and rolling to a safe state like Alaska.Comment
-
certainly you are not implying that they are teaching that the world is flat in some science classrooms.Originally posted by Joe Average
It is scary that these idiots should have any influence over what children are taught in science classrooms.Comment
-
then either vote against the recall, or start packingOriginally posted by Greg B
Well considering the shit jumping off out here in California I can see why!
This state is going to shit faster than a cowfield after slop time.
If Bustamonte wins I'm packin' and rolling to a safe state like Alaska.Comment
-
No... but in some places 'creation' gets equal time, even though it is decidedly unscientific.Originally posted by baddog
certainly you are not implying that they are teaching that the world is flat in some science classrooms.I used to get high on life but then I built up a tolerance.Comment
-
Maybe in Australia...but in the US...only in Religious Oriented Majors at a University...or Sunday School.Originally posted by Joe Average
No... but in some places 'creation' gets equal time, even though it is decidedly unscientific.When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
Yeah. The Piltdown man was real!Originally posted by Joe Average
Scientists mightn't agree on the details of evolution but they all agree that evolution is a fact and a reality. The evidence in all areas (fossil record, DNA etc) is overwhelming. The bottom line is that there is NO scientific evidence that invalidates evolution. It is the basis of modern biology.
Anti-evolutionists are almost always pushing fundamentalist Christianity. You know, these people are the type of morons that believe the world is 6000 years old. Some of them even believe that the world is flat because of passages in the Bible that imply that it is. It is scary that these idiots should have any influence over what children are taught in science classrooms.Comment
-
Originally posted by Joe Average
No... but in some places 'creation' gets equal time, even though it is decidedly unscientific.
Evolution is not foolproof either. Very few scientific theories are. And remember, Einstein was a firm believer in God. For scientific reasons, no less. However, I myself, I have an entirely different belief system, so arguing about it is neither here no there. I just figured I get my two cents in, because I think this thread is going to get big.Comment
-
there are as many muslims in the US as there are jews. Just they are no where near as visible..
and scientists can agree on evolution, the evidence is ROCK solid... I doubt furious female has heard of natural selection?
Very few Xtians still believe in creationism, and many Xtians now don't believe in the literal superior being.. It's interesting seeing how religion evolves to keep track with society..
As people become more educated the idea of atheism makes a lot more sense.Comment
-
uh uh...my mother is head of the science department at a public school district in the States and even to this day she has to fight to keep evolution in the classroom - and she is a born again Christian, she just also happens to have a scientific brain.Originally posted by theking
Maybe in Australia...but in the US...only in Religious Oriented Majors at a University...or Sunday School.
Evolution is not taught in every school district in the states.
Here are just a few articles about the recent text book battle in texas...it is still an issue.
http://www.family.org/cforum/fnif/news/a0028026.cfm
http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centr...ws/6740786.htmComment
-
All scientific theories are tentative - even gravity - but it is science and not religion that should be taught in science classrooms. Evolution is the only scientific theory we have to explain the emergence and development of life on Earth.Originally posted by LadyMischief
Evolution is not foolproof either. Very few scientific theories are.
As the great Russian geneticist Theodosius Dobzhansky said: "Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution"Last edited by Joe Average; 09-23-2003, 06:42 PM.I used to get high on life but then I built up a tolerance.Comment
-
Piltdown man was exposed by the scientific coummunity. Science is self-correcting. It discovers it's own errors and frauds invaldates them and moves on. That is the nature of science.Originally posted by LadyMischief
Yeah. The Piltdown man was real!I used to get high on life but then I built up a tolerance.Comment
-
If you study Genesis Chapter One carefully you will see that if you do some rearrangement of the verses and a little juxtaposing it fits very nicely into the evolution model. Only Christian fundamentalists believe the Bible is the uncorrupted, literal, inerrant, infallible word of God. There are millions of Christians that do not take that view.Originally posted by Joe Average
No... but in some places 'creation' gets equal time, even though it is decidedly unscientific.
An excellent source is one that PF started before he died and I occasionally update the index page to keep it alive as I may become involved in it at some point.
http://www.ronsbibleresearch.net/index.htmWhen you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
So your name is Ron?Originally posted by theking
If you study Genesis Chapter One carefully you will see that if you do some rearrangement of the verses and a little juxtaposing it fits very nicely into the evolution model. Only Christian fundamentalists believe the Bible is the uncorrupted, literal, inerrant, infallible word of God. There are millions of Christians that do not take that view.
An excellent source is one that PF started before he died and I occasionally update the index page to keep it alive as I may become involved in it at some point.
http://www.ronsbibleresearch.net/index.htmComment
-
No and before you ask PF's name was not Ron. Ron was a long time friend of PF.Originally posted by uranidiot
So your name is Ron?When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
Why trust any book if some or all of it needs to be rearranged and juxtaposed? If you were born in Japan or Egypt you would be another religion right now and you would read another holy book. The Bible may be a lot of things but a science textbook it is not.Originally posted by theking
If you study Genesis Chapter One carefully you will see that if you do some rearrangement of the verses and a little juxtaposing it fits very nicely into the evolution model. Only Christian fundamentalists believe the Bible is the uncorrupted, literal, inerrant, infallible word of God. There are millions of Christians that do not take that view.
An excellent source is one that PF started before he died and I occasionally update the index page to keep it alive as I may become involved in it at some point.
http://www.ronsbibleresearch.net/index.htm
I will, however, take a look at the link.I used to get high on life but then I built up a tolerance.Comment
-
And of course I'm sure a lot of meaning has been lost during 2,000 years of translations and edits ...Originally posted by Joe Average
Why trust any book if some or all of it needs to be rearranged and juxtaposed? If you were born in Japan or Egypt you would be another religion right now and you would read another holy book. The Bible may be a lot of things but a science textbook it is not.
I will, however, take a look at the link.Comment
-
You Christians kill me. When it suits your purpose you call the bible the word of God. But when you are taken to the mat on that by all the stupid and ridiculous things it says in there, well then you claim that the bible isn't to be taken literally. You turkeys lack all credibility.Originally posted by theking
Only Christian fundamentalists believe the Bible is the uncorrupted, literal, inerrant, infallible word of God. There are millions of Christians that do not take that view.
I mean if there is a god, and he wants people to worship him, then you would think he would make his instructions very clear right? I mean he is GOD afterall, he couldn't possibly be inarticulate or a poor communicator could he? It's fucking God - he rules over EVERYTHING - so how could he allow anything BUT an "uncorrupted, literal, inerrant, and infallible" translation of HIS word over time?
It seems to me that, by your own words theKing, either:
a) God is piss-poor communicator.
b) God is a piss-poor manager (for allowing "errors" to creep into HIS book).
c) God has a nasty streak and he is setting the human race up, by INTENTIONALLY communicating poorly and allowing errors to creep into "His word".
Or d) There is no God.
By definition of what a supreme being is, a) and b) are impossible don't you think? c) is possible but if he is a mean God and is just fucking with us all, then he isn't really God, he is Satan. So I guess the truth must be d) - there is no God.
Who would have thought that on GFY tonight we would use the bible to prove that there is no God.Comment
-
amen brother, amen.Originally posted by com
Religion, alchaholism, drug addiction are all of the same mental disease. They are crutches for those of us whome cannot cope with the day to day on their own.(b] cheap hmtl programer for hire (/b)Comment
-
FYI...I am not a religious person let alone a Christian...nor have I ever been...so you are preaching to the choir...which makes you look somewhat foolish...doesn't it. By the way you said "we"...do you suffer with multiple personalities?Originally posted by CoolE
You Christians kill me. When it suits your purpose you call the bible the word of God. But when you are taken to the mat on that by all the stupid and ridiculous things it says in there, well then you claim that the bible isn't to be taken literally. You turkeys lack all credibility.
I mean if there is a god, and he wants people to worship him, then you would think he would make his instructions very clear right? I mean he is GOD afterall, he couldn't possibly be inarticulate or a poor communicator could he? It's fucking God - he rules over EVERYTHING - so how could he allow anything BUT an "uncorrupted, literal, inerrant, and infallible" translation of HIS word over time?
It seems to me that, by your own words theKing, either:
a) God is piss-poor communicator.
b) God is a piss-poor manager (for allowing "errors" to creep into HIS book).
c) God has a nasty streak and he is setting the human race up, by INTENTIONALLY communicating poorly and allowing errors to creep into "His word".
Or d) There is no God.
By definition of what a supreme being is, a) and b) are impossible don't you think? c) is possible but if he is a mean God and is just fucking with us all, then he isn't really God, he is Satan. So I guess the truth must be d) - there is no God.
Who would have thought that on GFY tonight we would use the bible to prove that there is no God.Last edited by theking; 09-23-2003, 09:56 PM.When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
I see. I read more into your mention of that bible site then.Originally posted by theking
FYI...I am not a religious person let alone a Christian...nor have I ever been...so you are preaching to the choir.
Regardless, what you articulated is what all non-fundamentalist Christians articulate, namely that there are parts of the bible that no sane person would actually carry out, and that these are just "mistakes" that aren't to be taken literally.Comment
-
You editted your post make it more nasty. Are you sure you aren't a Christian?Originally posted by theking
FYI...I am not a religious person let alone a Christian...nor have I ever been...so you are preaching to the choir...which makes you look somewhat foolish...doesn't it. By the way you said "we"...do you suffer with multiple personalities?Comment
-
Yes I am sure...and as far as being nasty...I just do not tolerate fools very well...and the leap that you took is foolish in my opinion...and in addition the "we" you referred to did not prove anything...unless you consider the words you posted to be proof...at least in your mind...but generally speaking words are not proof of anything.Originally posted by CoolE
You editted your post make it more nasty. Are you sure you aren't a Christian?When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
Aw heck, don't take a rocket scientist to figure out why the Christian Fundamentalists are so annoyed with the THEORY ( note THEORY ) of evolution. Evolution is a process. The big debate is the SOURCE of that process. You can see evolution in the developement of any land mammal in the womb. Starts out as a simple multi-celled life form and goes from mullusk to fish to reptile/amphibian to several other things and then to that funny looking thing that looks like you, your wife and in-laws.Originally posted by theking
If you study Genesis Chapter One carefully you will see that if you do some rearrangement of the verses and a little juxtaposing it fits very nicely into the evolution model. Only Christian fundamentalists believe the Bible is the uncorrupted, literal, inerrant, infallible word of God. There are millions of Christians that do not take that view.
An excellent source is one that PF started before he died and I occasionally update the index page to keep it alive as I may become involved in it at some point.
http://www.ronsbibleresearch.net/index.htm
Fundamentalists aren't pissed that a theory of evolution exists. They probably are just upset because human life emerged from Africa and that would make their ancestors black people and that would fuck up their racial superiority bullshit they spew to milk loot out of illiterate masses. Plus it wouldn't justify the pillaging of Africa, Europe, Asia and everywhere else by these psychos.
Now if someone found an ancient human in Europe older than the present ones found in Africa, you can bet your bottom dollar there'd be posters of Charles Darwin next to Elvis and Jesus on the walls of every trailer park from here to the Pecos.Comment
-
Okay as someone who's studied theology with the best theologians on Earth, lemme explain something.Originally posted by Joe Average
Why trust any book if some or all of it needs to be rearranged and juxtaposed? If you were born in Japan or Egypt you would be another religion right now and you would read another holy book. The Bible may be a lot of things but a science textbook it is not.
I will, however, take a look at the link.
The scriptures are a collection of written works based on passed down oral stories covering at least 15,000 years of history.
It's like the story of the fish that got away. Everytime you tell it, the fish gets bigger.
The problem with the scriptures is simple: People.
People telling a story will change this or that and fuck up this and fuck up that til by the time you get the spiel it's so confusing and conflicting it looses alot in the translation and the biggest thing it looses is TRUTH.
The Bible as we have come to call it ( which means The Book ) is a collection of books written over thousands of years by multiple authors. Intentionally meant as a written record ( the word of God meaning these are testaments that God always keeps his WORD...get it? Word of God? God keeps his word? Get it? Hunh? ) so that future generations of a select group of people would have their history in tact.
Problem is adapting these stories to cultures they weren't intended to be shown to. Yet that changed because the legality of the events is simple: God creates man, God realizes the boo boos and frailties, God takes responsibility, becomes a man and takes the rap for mankind's fuck ups. Simple and noble story.
Yet the versions of the scriptures we have today have been edited by self seeking profiteers. Primarily the Conference of Nicea where unauthorized persons decided what should and shouldn't be in the scriptures without even asking the Pope! Heck they even took out 'reincarnation' when it was a staple and continues to be a staple in the basic orthodox Christian and Judaic faiths. That version is the version we have today after being translated from Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, Latin, German, Old English, Modern English.
Great historical works, and a matter of faith. Gotta remember though, it wasn't until the mid to late 1800s that the masses of humanity actually could get their hands on a complete version of the King James Bible. Heck, most people couldn't even read it til the late 1800s. Figures hunh? Usually ONE person had a Bible and read it to others. Expensive book back then.
Now it's everywhere and we're killing more of one another than ever before. Figures hunh?Comment
-
Hell yeah. It seems like the establishment needs to give up on things like the war on drugs and try and take out the big enemy of mankind - religion.Originally posted by Greg B
Now it's everywhere and we're killing more of one another than ever before. Figures hunh?I used to get high on life but then I built up a tolerance.Comment
-
psychiatrist will discuss your case over email for a feeComment
-
so how do you live with yourself?Originally posted by theking
...and as far as being nasty...I just do not tolerate fools very well...
your posts on this board are some of the most foolish I've seen.
or is that because you spend too much time anaesthetizing yourself with alcohol?Comment
-
I'm not sure we're killing ourselves more than any other time. Humans have always been violent. We just hear about it more now because of modern communications.Originally posted by Greg B
Now it's everywhere and we're killing more of one another than ever before.Comment
-
when liberal half wits are called on the carpet for siding with the enemy they always scream "Nazi", point over our heads, and sneak out while no ones looking.Originally posted by ThunderBalls
Page 23 from the Nazi/right wing handbook:
"When someone defends the constitution (other than the 2nd Amendment) accuse them of siding with the enemy."
God forbid they would have to explain their actions.
I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.Comment
-
Stop trying to pretend some "liberal half wit" hasn't got the better of you.Originally posted by 12clicks
when liberal half wits are called on the carpet for siding with the enemy they always scream "Nazi", point over our heads, and sneak out while no ones looking.
Comment
-
Originally posted by uranidiot
Stop trying to pretend some "liberal half wit" hasn't got the better of you. keep saying it liberal, that will make it true
I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.Comment
-
ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!............................
ok peeps............it would seem that while on earth, we as humans would have that so called, "God given right," to CHOOSE what we do here on this planet without divine intervention...... if i am interpreting correctly. It seems that God would have nothing to do with what we do here and would have no intervention in our daily decisions. For God to intervene would be to change the entire experience of "the freedom of choice".......as per se. God, as defined in man's texts, only deals with you AFTER you have died, in your time of judgement. In other words, who fucking cares what Colin Powell thinks as he is just another human who will be judged the same as anyone else AFTER his life........just as you.........just as me...........(if that is what you believe)........
Besides, I wouldnt worry nearly as much as how God would judge you, as how your fellow humans will judge you.........the results can intervene your life in horrible ways........
Comment
-
You're an extremist aren't you? You probably consider Steve Forbes a liberal.Originally posted by 12clicks
keep saying it liberal, that will make it true
Comment
-
you must be newOriginally posted by uranidiot
You're an extremist aren't you? You probably consider Steve Forbes a liberal.
Comment
-
ah, an extremist.Originally posted by uranidiot
You're an extremist aren't you? You probably consider Steve Forbes a liberal.
That's what liberals call people who won't compromise with the stupid or negotiate with the wrong.
typical.
I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.Comment
-
The meaning you are missing here is SARCASM! (I was trying to make a point as to how ridiculous this fanatical "anti-church and state stuff has become)Originally posted by baddog
because the people in there had religious beliefs, and they wanted them displayed on their graves. You have a problem with that?
Someone gives their life for our country and you are going to tell them they can't have a cross to mark their grave because we buried them on land owned by the governement?Michael Sperber / Acella Financial LLC/ Online Payment Processing
[email protected] / http://Acellafinancial.com/
ICQ 177961090 / Tel +1 909 NET BILL / Skype msperberComment
-
Originally posted by 12clicks
ah, an extremist.
That's what liberals call people who won't compromise with the stupid or negotiate with the wrong.
typical.
I guess the word 'liberal' became a bad word in your neck of the woods the day slavery became illegal.Comment
-
you've got the liberal lingo, if only you had a thought to go with it.Originally posted by ThunderBalls
I guess the word 'liberal' became a bad word in your neck of the woods the day slavery became illegal.
I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.Comment
-
Hold on just one minute! Slavery became illegal?! When did that happen??Originally posted by ThunderBalls
I guess the word 'liberal' became a bad word in your neck of the woods the day slavery became illegal.Michael Sperber / Acella Financial LLC/ Online Payment Processing
[email protected] / http://Acellafinancial.com/
ICQ 177961090 / Tel +1 909 NET BILL / Skype msperberComment
-
lib·er·alOriginally posted by 12clicks
you've got the liberal lingo, if only you had a thought to go with it.
(lbr-l, lbrl)
adj.
1. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.
2. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.
Proud of it Nazi Boy.Comment
-
hahahaha, lets see, he's used "nazi" twice and thrown in "slavery" for effect.Originally posted by ThunderBalls
lib·er·al
(lbr-l, lbrl)
adj.
1. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.
2. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.
Proud of it Nazi Boy.
of brains, there is none.
I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.Comment
-
hey this incongruous maniacal laughing looks like fun. lemme have a go.
(b] cheap hmtl programer for hire (/b)Comment
-
mwahahahaha
(b] cheap hmtl programer for hire (/b)Comment
-
another dopey liberal. don't you have burgers to go flip?Originally posted by 12clicks
hahahaha, lets see, he's used "nazi" twice and thrown in "slavery" for effect.
of brains, there is none.
Comment
Comment