The Paycom Future.... is it possibly very bright?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shap
    Confirmed User
    • May 2001
    • 8313

    #1

    The Paycom Future.... is it possibly very bright?

    I've got one key question on my mind now that Chris Mallick has been removed as CEO. Will paycom continue their agressive style of being the processor that allows you to make more money from every surfer? Personally I've always found their style to be too agressive. One biggie being pre-checked cross sales. I know Chris was HUUUUUUGE on cross sales and on making paycom clients as much money as possible. Obviously doing this carried high risk.

    It would be a great move for our industry if paycom switched to a safer business model. Ccbill is doing a great job imo. We lost ibill and jettis in 2004. We need to have ccbill and paycom standing tall for years to come.
  • Ray@TastyDollars
    • May 2002
    • 6797

    #2
    I must have been in hiding cause I didnt hear anything about Chris Mallick being removed. Got a link?

    Shap I have to agree, I never liked the idea of pre-checked cross sales myself. I always thought of it as a tiny bit fraudulent. Some were downright ridiculous,especially the $80 cross sales after a 1 day trials.

    As for Paycom in general, they do awesome for me! Im counting the days till they are available in EU!

    Ray

    Comment

    • WiredGuy
      Pounding Googlebot
      • Aug 2002
      • 34517

      #3
      This is all a business of risk management, if epoch is able to do it and stay within their CB threshholds, all the more to them I say.

      WG
      I play with Google.

      Comment

      • PerfectionGirls
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Oct 2002
        • 4484

        #4
        Originally posted by shap
        I've got one key question on my mind now that Chris Mallick has been removed as CEO. Will paycom continue their agressive style of being the processor that allows you to make more money from every surfer? Personally I've always found their style to be too agressive. One biggie being pre-checked cross sales. I know Chris was HUUUUUUGE on cross sales and on making paycom clients as much money as possible. Obviously doing this carried high risk.

        It would be a great move for our industry if paycom switched to a safer business model. Ccbill is doing a great job imo. We lost ibill and jettis in 2004. We need to have ccbill and paycom standing tall for years to come.
        I have no doubt that Paycoms future is bright, with or without pre-checked boxes. However, I am certain if will mean the end for several sponsors that rely so much on them.
        SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

        Comment

        • ListYourPorn
          Confirmed User
          • Jan 2004
          • 791

          #5
          Originally posted by shap
          I've got one key question on my mind now that Chris Mallick has been removed as CEO. Will paycom continue their agressive style of being the processor that allows you to make more money from every surfer? Personally I've always found their style to be too agressive. One biggie being pre-checked cross sales. I know Chris was HUUUUUUGE on cross sales and on making paycom clients as much money as possible. Obviously doing this carried high risk.

          It would be a great move for our industry if paycom switched to a safer business model. Ccbill is doing a great job imo. We lost ibill and jettis in 2004. We need to have ccbill and paycom standing tall for years to come.
          I agree with you - you have to remember that there are more companies out there that can help - CCbill rocks my only fear is they approve accounts which IMHO should not be allowed as they just dont cut the mustard or their content is a little too aggressive.


          Sex Add your sites Click Here

          Comment

          • BradShaw
            Confirmed User
            • Oct 2001
            • 7840

            #6
            Paycom is not nearly as agressive as they were a year ago.
            Sig too big

            http://www.gofuckyourself.com/gfy_faqs.html

            Want to use a large banner in your sig??? Contact Eric about getting on as an advertiser - eric AT adult.com

            Comment

            • polish_aristocrat
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Jul 2002
              • 40377

              #7
              do we need 4 separate threads about this issue?
              I don't use ICQ anymore.

              Comment

              • Pleasurepays
                BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
                • Aug 2002
                • 11913

                #8
                i think that a simple fact that the adult business should be warming up to is that Visa and others do not want IPSP's to exist in the first place. "what might be" with any particular processor is not relevent in the long term if you are not seeing the bigger picture of where the industry and processors are going anway.

                Comment

                • alias
                  aliasx
                  • Apr 2001
                  • 19010

                  #9
                  damn, paycom next ?
                  https://porncorporation.com

                  Comment

                  • Shap
                    Confirmed User
                    • May 2001
                    • 8313

                    #10
                    Brad I agree 100% with you. And while that is costing some people alot of money it's going to make us all alot more in the long run. Wouldn't you say?

                    Comment

                    • cherrylula
                      lol
                      • Jan 2002
                      • 15969

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Pleasurepays
                      i think that a simple fact that the adult business should be warming up to is that Visa and others do not want IPSP's to exist in the first place. "what might be" with any particular processor is not relevent in the long term if you are not seeing the bigger picture of where the industry and processors are going anway.
                      8 char, what he said.

                      Comment

                      • xxxdesign-net
                        My hips don't lie
                        • Nov 2002
                        • 10129

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Pleasurepays
                        i think that a simple fact that the adult business should be warming up to is that Visa and others do not want IPSP's to exist in the first place. "what might be" with any particular processor is not relevent in the long term if you are not seeing the bigger picture of where the industry and processors are going anway.

                        might be relevent in the mid term though...

                        Comment

                        • Triple 6
                          Confirmed User
                          • Feb 2002
                          • 5394

                          #13
                          the light is dim ....


                          flickering........
                          SIG TOO SMALL! Maximum 1200x600 button and no more than 30 text lines of ALL SIZES and COLORS. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 6240x4800 instead of a 1024x800.

                          Comment

                          • Pleasurepays
                            BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
                            • Aug 2002
                            • 11913

                            #14
                            Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
                            might be relevent in the mid term though...
                            nothing is relevant if you are not prepared for the enevitable changes ahead. done is done. finished is finished. dead is dead.

                            what i am getting at is that people are often not seeing the forest for the trees. how strong/professional epoch is, how much longer Ibill will last etc etc etc has nothing to do with the bigger picture and that is that there is no way that anyone can argue that their lives are ever going to get easier as IPSP's. doesn't matter what kind of company they run. if you are making yourself dependent on a dying business model, then you will most likely die with them.

                            the first point of agreement between IPSP's when Visa USA changed their rules last time was that the rules were designed specifically to hurt IPSP's and to put more pressure on them and put them out of business. that should have been everyones wake up call... and the real question is not "how great is epoch". the real question people should be asking is "what i am doing to prepare myself and my company for the strong possibility that they can cease to exist at anytime no matter how great they are"

                            just my opinion.

                            "making money" is short term thinking. "building a company that will always make money and weather any changes ahead" is long term thinking and requires a completely different mind set than most people have in this industry. if you are making less than 10K a month... maybe you are thinking about "making money"... and if your mini empire collapsed, you could easily figure out other ways to make 10K a month. you could do that selling shoes at Nordstroms. however, if you are making a lot more than that, you should be thinking long term, rather than just preparing yourself for where to lay blame for your eventual failure and collapse when highly probable and seemingly enevitable changes do finally happen.

                            Comment

                            • BradShaw
                              Confirmed User
                              • Oct 2001
                              • 7840

                              #15
                              Originally posted by shap
                              Brad I agree 100% with you. And while that is costing some people alot of money it's going to make us all alot more in the long run. Wouldn't you say?

                              It is all risk management.

                              But lets be real, this is online porn. The game of quick $ and staying one step ahead of the Visa monster.
                              Sig too big

                              http://www.gofuckyourself.com/gfy_faqs.html

                              Want to use a large banner in your sig??? Contact Eric about getting on as an advertiser - eric AT adult.com

                              Comment

                              • Doctor Dre
                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                • Jan 2001
                                • 51692

                                #16
                                Time will tell ... the agressive marketing was needed ... but I agree that crossales are mostly a dumy catch for surfers .

                                One click membership upgrades are really nice thought
                                Originally posted by rayadp05
                                I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?

                                Comment

                                • elric
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Aug 2002
                                  • 296

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Pleasurepays
                                  i think that a simple fact that the adult business should be warming up to is that Visa and others do not want IPSP's to exist in the first place. "what might be" with any particular processor is not relevent in the long term if you are not seeing the bigger picture of where the industry and processors are going anway.
                                  Exactly right.

                                  Visa/MC are putting the squeeze on all the IPSPs. They want that margin for themselves. They want everyone to get their own merchant accounts and they will charge extra fees and have very restrictive terms for adult processing.
                                  <--- I have never worked with this program.

                                  Comment

                                  Working...