Hollywood's Hottest (celeb content) sued by 5 studios for $6 million

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Mr.Fiction
    Confirmed User
    • Feb 2002
    • 9484
    #1

    Hollywood's Hottest (celeb content) sued by 5 studios for $6 million

    Studios clamp down on nudie compilations

    Hollywood's Hottest Body Shots, Hollywood's Hottest Before They Were Famous and Hollywood's Hottest Love Scenes have all been made available for your perverted pleasure and had managed to stay under the studios' radars until now. Breaching more copyright laws than the MPAA can shake a subpoena at, Radioactive has been slapped with a lawsuit by Universal, Fox, MGM, Paramount and Orion Pictures, all demanding that the tapes be destroyed and seeking $6 million in damages.

    http://www.empireonline.co.uk/news/news.asp?story=5004
    Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA
    Tags: None
    • reynold
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Oct 2002
      • 51271
      #2
      "Suffice it to say that the studios will likely own the Radioactive management's houses, cars, family pets and immortal souls by the time this lawsuit's over. "

      LOLOL

        Comment

        • DatingGold
          $6 PER EMAIL JOiN
          • Feb 2003
          • 13185
          #3
          game over
          9 Years of SOLID payouts and conversions!



          ADULT DATING - $100 PPS

          LIVE CAMS - $214 PPS

          WWW.DATINGGOLD.COM

          ICQ: 27442303

            Comment

            • skazzel
              Confirmed User
              • Jun 2002
              • 270
              #4
              If they just have certain scenes from the videos and have commentary to go along with them, then this should fall under "fair use". Of course, going against the MPAA you would need a lot of money and lawyers even if what you are doing is legal.
              FTVGirls simply convert better.
              More free content than SobeGirl and
              conversions almost as good as Swoit!

                Comment

                • DeadFidel
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jul 2003
                  • 6764
                  #5
                  I saw this coming the first time I saw the commercial. It seemed too good to be true, too easy...

                  and true, they needed better commentary, ex: " Reese Witherspoon sure has nice fuckin tits doesn't she?'

                  "The tapes had gone unnoticed by the actresses portrayed in them, sold only through late night television ads during male-friendly programme's like the Howard Stern Show. Sleazy clips accompanied lines like: "your favorite superstars doing the nasty in ways you've never heard of." Classy."

                  And leave fucking Howard out of this. What about MrSin?

                    Comment

                    • Mr.Fiction
                      Confirmed User
                      • Feb 2002
                      • 9484
                      #6
                      Originally posted by skazzel
                      If they just have certain scenes from the videos and have commentary to go along with them, then this should fall under "fair use". Of course, going against the MPAA you would need a lot of money and lawyers even if what you are doing is legal.
                      Their marketing probably won't help them when they try to claim it's "fair use". Like you said, even if they could eventually win, how much will it cost to fight five movie studios?
                      Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

                        Comment

                        • WiredGuy
                          Pounding Googlebot
                          • Aug 2002
                          • 34517
                          #7
                          Are these the guys who used late night tv ads to sell their tapes?
                          WG
                          I play with Google.

                            Comment

                            • ldinternet
                              Confirmed User
                              • Apr 2001
                              • 8245
                              #8
                              Originally posted by DeadFidel
                              The tapes had gone unnoticed by the actresses portrayed in them, sold only through late night television ads during male-friendly programme's like the Howard Stern Show.

                                Comment

                                Previous template Next
                                Working...