Quote:
If you're assuming that a large percentage of genetically unique
people can come in contact with HIV - and without "current
treatment" survive biologically & normally, THEN you must also
agree there is a LARGE percentagte of genetically unique people
THAT CAN NOT contact this virus and therefore it is eveyone's
concern.
The term "HIV+" must be left to mean you have a life long
infection where your behaviour MUST change.
|
Seems you got me a little wrong back there is all.... Just
semantics on what "HIV+" means as far as the inside of the body
and the outside behaviour are 2 different things.
I'm just saying that a HIV+ test means you had the antibody and
doesn't mean you have any kind of life threatening illness or are
in any way contagious. Of course, If you have tested positive
then there is no way to tell if you actually have virus protein in
your body. Only that you have antibodies. Meaning that the
term "HIV+" means "Don't fuck me". Regardless of what is
actually happening in their body.
So I'd say.... The term "HIV+" must be left to mean you have a life
long infection where your behaviour MUST change..... However
the actual term "HIV+" means you have tested postive to HIV
antibodies.
However as I said b4.... All this doesn't interest me at all. I just
can't believe this guy actually shared his view in an
interview. "It's a horrible development that affects our whole
industry" would have been much better than "fuck it, it's all a lie
anyway".
-Ben
__________________
Cyberwurx Hosting
After trying 5 different hosts, I found the best.
Since 1997 I've had 2 hours of downtime.
Fast support, great techs, no hype, no gimmicks.
<- I in no way endorse whatever just got stuck on the left of my post.