50 Iraqis on the attackees
U.S. Admits Needs Help In Iraq, World Balks
Collapse
X
-
-
Those fighting a much larger army long ago worked out that having unrelated, and therefore, unorganised 'cells' was a better way to fight. That is due to improved strategy, not any implication of size or effectiveness. I agree tho, it's going to take the Iraqis a few months to really learn how to kill occupying army members effectively, and hence *seem* more organised.Originally posted by theking
I am satisfied that some Iraqi people are egaging in resistance...those of the Baath Party...those that had some loyalty to Saddam...those religious leaders that would prefer a fundalmentalist government...probably some infiltrators from outside of Iraq...as well as some that are just plain pissed.
I do not agree that their is any organized "guerrilla" resistance...though some have called it "guerilla" type resistance.
Or until the drain of money gets too much for your government to stand. This is an expensive war at the moment, and it could get worse.Originally posted by theking
We will engage them as long as this type of resistance continues...which I suspect will be for a generation or two...or until the American people take to the streets...as they did during the Vietnam era.
Or, possibly, until Bush is out. It wouldn't surprize me if some leader other than Bush attempted some kind of face-saving pull-out. This is so Bush's war.
I doubt that, France, Germany etc are also members of NATO with all that that implies and politically NATO would be almost as unacceptable to some in the ME as the U.S.Originally posted by theking
I suspect that NATO forces will eventually be deployed. UN Peacekeepers are not needed at this point.
In 1904, Charles Newman-Berry connected two abacus's together using specially enhanced GrapeVine thus inventing the first Internet connection.
NEWMAN-BERRY CASH
Paying webmaster since 1904Comment
-
France is not a member of NATO...unless they have rejoined NATO again...they withdrew many, many years ago.Originally posted by scooby doo as scooby does
I doubt that, France, Germany etc are also members of NATO with all that that implies and politically NATO would be almost as unacceptable to some in the ME as the U.S.When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
"Bremer: U.S. Can't Go It Alone"Originally posted by theking
I cannot see anywhere in the article that Bremer said "U.S. Can't Go It Alone". Maybe you can point that out to me.
the title.
I dont work for Fox news, I didnt write it.<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" border="1" bgcolor="#008000"><tr><td><font size=3>Gone</font></td></tr></table>Comment
-
Still member....Originally posted by theking
France is not a member of NATO...unless they have rejoined NATO again...they withdrew many, many years ago.
http://www.nato.int/issues/faq/index.htm#A4Q: What are the official languages of NATO?
A: The two official languages of NATO are English and French.
and as a general answer of Nato possible invoilment:
Q: What is NATO?s position on Iraq?
A: The campaign against Iraq in 2003 was conducted by a coalition of forces from different countries, some of which were NATO member countries and some were not. NATO as an organisation had no role in the campaign but undertook a number of measures in accordance with Article 4 of the North Atlantic Treaty, to ensure the security of one of its members, Turkey, in the event of a threat to it resulting from the war in Iraq.
On 21 May 2003, the Alliance agreed to support Poland, a member of NATO, in its leadership of a sector in the stabilization force in Iraq. NATO will not have any permanent presence in Iraq, but will aid Poland in a variety of supporting roles. This will include help with force generation, communication, logistics and movements.
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
Originally posted by directfiesta
France's withdrawal from NATO.
http://www.nato.int/shape/news/2003/history/h030722.htm
Show me a link where France rejoined NATO please?When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
think the key thing to note is the withdrawal from military structure...Originally posted by theking
France's withdrawal from NATO.
http://www.nato.int/shape/news/2003/history/h030722.htm
Show me a link where France rejoined NATO please?
they are still a member of nato
http://www.nato.int/structur/countries.htmSUBMIT YOUR BABE GALLERIES
PROMOTE YOUR BLOG HERE
always looking for hardlinks icq #207011694
Thunder-Ball.net, good for hardlink exchangesComment
-
And with further research on my part...you are correct.Originally posted by pudcat
think the key thing to note is the withdrawal from military structure...
they are still a member of nato
http://www.nato.int/structur/countries.htmWhen you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
Actually, I rather see the US stay an economical power.Originally posted by SexySarah
in 10 years when the US is in the crapper (in every sense), we'll all have a good laugh
The US and EU do alot of trade and we can't have one going down without causing major financial problems in the world.Comment


Comment