http://www.********.com/read.aspx?ID=7673 seems that its OK now to bann and burn books.. sound familar? read your history books while you can.
-
-
-
Banning a book with nude photos of a porn star would be a bit different than banning a book because of controversial words. Does your library loan out XXX DVDs?.Comment
-
I wish they did!Originally posted by mardigras
NICHE MONEY >> Ass Worship • Panties • Solo Teen • Pantyhose
Serving up exclusive fetish sites since 1997!Comment
-
You're kidding right? What's a woman's version of a porno? A "romance" novel. These things are just as naughty as any porno movie, but it's all in words instead of pictures. Suppose the little kiddies get a hold of those! Yet, they are in most public libraries and no one seems to give a shit about them. Now a porn star writes an autobiography and suddenly we're gaining a conscience over this material? I call "BULLSHIT!"Originally posted by mardigrasAlt Journals, Blogs for Perverts!
Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training
"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."Comment
-
Only in America the land of the free
hosted flv's, hosted galleries, morphing rss feeds, free content, free sites, hosted blogComment
-
Romance novels generally come with 1 pic, and that is on the front cover and I have never seen one that shows genitalia. Lot's of libraries didn't stock Sex by Madonna even though at least 1 set of "advocates" forced a city's library to stock the picture book chock full of male and female frontal nudity and simulated sex acts.Originally posted by CET
The article doesn't say how explicit the pics from Jenna's career or the ones taken especially for the book are, but I would imagine they are not "artistic" ones with palm tree leaves cleverly barely covering nipples and vaginas. Perhaps if the book had a special library edition minus the picture section it would pass the librarian test. The reviews I've read online says that there is explicit and detailed sex talk, so if you think the library should be required to carry it should you be OK with the library stocking stuff like First Hand, a gay book of JO stories which features pics such as men with big cocks in crotchless chaps
I'm not being prudish nor would it matter to me one way or the other if my local library carried the book, I just understand and accept why they would not. There is no "right" to pornography at a public library. If you want to see pics of a naked porn star visit your local adult shop or go online.Last edited by mardigras; 01-07-2005, 05:05 AM..Comment
-
yup, this is a slippery slope al right:Originally posted by cspdinc
""""I don't think we should just order (any) books," Holm said. "It should go through a review process, and those books that are inappropriate for children should be in a place where children don't have access to them.""""
if you're a moron.
I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.Comment
-
I love it when freaks like Holm show the world who they are
No matter what you say, censorship is wrong!
So where does it stop? Let me guess, the shelves of a library should only adorn bibles.
Zighail (or whatever)!Comment
-
Adolf Bush is really moving this country right along.PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic
AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!Comment
-
oh how the idiots do prattle on.Originally posted by Paco, of Large Cash.I love it when freaks like Holm show the world who they are
No matter what you say, censorship is wrong!
So where does it stop? Let me guess, the shelves of a library should only adorn bibles.
Zighail (or whatever)!
I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.Comment
-
-
Where the fuck did it say anything about burning books? What a bunch of fucktards.Comment
-
Who suggested that?Originally posted by Paco, of Large Cash.
Most (if not all) public libraries wouldn't put Jenna's movies out on the shelf, why should an explicit book with pictures from those same movies bypass a library's policy of not stocking porn?
Madonna didn't succede in getting porn into the library and if the photos in the book are explicit Jenna isn't going to either. It's not a censorship thing, it's just common decency. Want porn? It's not censored, it's quite easy to get..Comment
-
Hmm ... so are you tagging me as the idiot?Originally posted by 12clicksoh how the idiots do prattle on.Comment
-
-
View it how you wish ... to deny a person the option of choosing for them self is censorship.Originally posted by mardigras
Does the library have a section on sex? In that section is there a book on sexual positions. Or the anatomy of the human body? And what about the art or photography section?
Madonna's box was not porn BTW, it was classified as erotic art.Last edited by Paco, of Large Cash.; 01-07-2005, 09:35 AM.Comment
-
So your libraries up in Canada carry playboy and the likes do they? I must have missed the part where cheeseheads were able to influence US policies of any kind...Originally posted by Paco, of Large Cash.Comment
-
uh, real nice - at no point did I bring up the Canada-USA 'thing' that everyone likes to bitch about, nor have I ever insulted the US, but go right ahead.Originally posted by darksoft
All I am saying is censorship is bad and is viewed no differently from burning a book. As for what is at the libraries in Canada ... lots of stuff.Comment
-
I thought this thread was gonna be about a new program for Asian shower scenes.....Comment
-
I quoted your post and referanced it with "idiot" and you're still asking this question?Originally posted by Paco, of Large Cash.
kinda makes my point, no?
I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.Comment
-
Nope, not at all - see I was merely being polite by asking/verifying whom you were referring to as the idiot, me or the Nazi Holm. You say me, fine - that is what makes some parts of the world great - everyone is entitled to their own opinion.Originally posted by 12clicksI quoted your post and referanced it with "idiot" and you're still asking this question?
kinda makes my point, no?
As you believe my chatter is meaningless you have stated that you agree with censorship -- sorry to see that, but that your choice.Comment
-
Censorship is absolutely different than burning a book. It was PORN. PORN does not belong in libraries. Keeping PORN out of public libraries is not censorship, it's common sense.Originally posted by Paco, of Large Cash.
What exactly is "lots of stuff"... have you even been to a public library lately?Comment
-
The book is not porn, it is an autobiography, which receives rave reviews and some classify as the best todate. Read a reviewOriginally posted by darksoft
Yes, there are some explicit pictures as are in many other books in the library, in Canada or wherever. Just visit the photography section, let alone the many other areas with 'porn'.
As for 'common sense': not using a hairdryer while in the tub is common sense. Censors denying an autobiography, written partly by a porn queen, the right to sit on a shelf along with many other books is censorship.
Guess I am the only one that believes our industry is not evil and deserves the same rights of many others.
Everyone thinks porn is cool but will anyone stand up for it or try to view it from a fair or equal angle ... apparently not.Last edited by Paco, of Large Cash.; 01-07-2005, 11:51 AM.Comment
-
Call me kooky, but shouldn't one read or at least view a book BEFORE they make a judgement about it?I still love everybodyComment
-
Much like anything else, porn has it's place. That place is not in a public library.Originally posted by Paco, of Large Cash.Comment
-
I think that is/you are correct, otherwise it is merely an assertion or personal opinion.Originally posted by titmowseComment
-
I do agree with that, porn does have it's place.Originally posted by darksoft
I was merely trying to stand-up for JJ's book as it is not as bad as most seem to think it is.
Guess I should drink less coffee before posting
Comment
-
That's what I was thinking, too.Originally posted by titmowseRaven
~RETIRED~
Comment
-
Again, that is correct, and the person on the crusade, Holm, has not read the book.Originally posted by Raven
Stating that there was a fine line between Jameson's book being a best seller and porn, Holm, who has not read the book, said she would not support porn and make it accessible to children.
So she classified it as porn with out even giving it half a chance, let alone being fair.Last edited by Paco, of Large Cash.; 01-07-2005, 01:08 PM.Comment
-
Some people get offended seeing women in bikinis. I have no problem with it, but then what I consider acceptable some people may not.Originally posted by Paco, of Large Cash.I do agree with that, porn does have it's place.
I was merely trying to stand-up for JJ's book as it is not as bad as most seem to think it is.
Guess I should drink less coffee before posting
It's been a while but the last photo books I looked thru weren't explicit in any sense of the word and rarely showed genitalia if at all.
I'm not saying she has a bad book. I'm saying it's one I don't think should be in a public library. I think a lot of stuff shouldn't be in a public library, and it's not. That's just MY opinion. My ideas changed a lot when I became a father 17+ years ago.Comment
-
wrong, asshat.Originally posted by Paco, of Large Cash.
I've pointed out that you don't know what censorship is. It's unimtelligent people like you in our business that will one day being its undoing.
Not being bright enough to understand the difference between keeping pornography out of the hands of children and censorship will one day get you in trouble. Today it merely got you laughed at.
Or are you advocating the distribution of porn to children? is that it?
what is your real motive behind your wanting to show pornography to children?
is there something about you you're not telling us about?
a secret proclivity perhaps?I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.Comment
-
The book is entertaining (it does contain many shocking stories as most can imagine) and her writing aid did a fabulous job.Originally posted by darksoft
I am single, so I cannot view it from a parent?s point of view, but trying to, I can see the concern.Comment
-
what was the title again, moron?Originally posted by Paco, of Large Cash.
I don't want the title of the book viewable to children let alone whats inside.I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.Comment
Comment