Porn Sites May Stream No More

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MILE29
    So Fucking Banned
    • Mar 2003
    • 7

    #1

    Porn Sites May Stream No More

    http://wired.com/news/business/0,1367,59666,00.html
  • tony299
    lurker
    • Aug 2002
    • 57021

    #2
    Is it necessary for the assholes to call them smuthouses?

    Comment

    • BRISK
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Feb 2003
      • 12240

      #3
      non-event
      I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do,
      I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.

      Comment

      • wargames
        Kliris
        • May 2003
        • 10423

        #4
        huh?
        ICQ 212-115-582
        Email Steve at Vas Media Group .com

        Comment

        • teenjump
          So Fucking Banned
          • Jul 2003
          • 1595

          #5
          Wired.com said it, so it must be true.

          Comment

          • afrocreep
            Confirmed User
            • Aug 2001
            • 1074

            #6
            thats bullshit.. i wish i came up with that patent.

            But seriously, that means no streaming of anything by anyone what-so-over

            Comment

            • ThePornGuy
              Confirmed User
              • Mar 2003
              • 275

              #7
              I bet you microsoft or apple or somebody will step up and sqaush them real soon.

              Comment

              • Mojo Rizin
                Confirmed User
                • Dec 2002
                • 1089

                #8
                Does this patent cover ticker tapes as well?

                Tapes like stock quotes and sports scores?

                Start Making Reel Profits Today!

                VOIP Technology Is NOW

                Comment

                • candyflip
                  Carpe Visio
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 43075

                  #9
                  Originally posted by ThePornGuy
                  I bet you microsoft or apple or somebody will step up and sqaush them real soon.
                  Or buy them out and stick it to us themselves.

                  Spend you some brain.
                  Email Me

                  Comment

                  • Brujah
                    Beer Money Baron
                    • Jan 2001
                    • 22157

                    #10
                    At least we know who didn't respond now.

                    Judge Alice Marie Stotler prohibited Extreme Productions, Go Entertainment, Lace Productions, WebZotic and Wild Ventures from transmitting compressed digital video from any of their websites.

                    Comment

                    • adultvisitors
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 1417

                      #11
                      Very funny!
                      Us laws or this accasssiaisa really makes me laugh....

                      I dont know how they even got the idea of creating patent
                      on such a thing...
                      Buy traffic!
                      Best Secure Online Casino Bonus Guide! Click Here!

                      Comment

                      • quiet
                        we'll miss you our friend. RIP
                        • Sep 2001
                        • 25115

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Brujah
                        At least we know who didn't respond now.

                        Judge Alice Marie Stotler prohibited Extreme Productions, Go Entertainment, Lace Productions, WebZotic and Wild Ventures from transmitting compressed digital video from any of their websites.
                        interesting.

                        and wired is sounding more and more like setgo lol
                        we'll miss you our friend. RIP

                        Comment

                        • FRANKENSTEIN
                          Confirmed User
                          • Feb 2003
                          • 272

                          #13
                          Excerpt from their current patent: "The present invention relates generally to an audio and video transmission and receiving system, and more specifically to such a system in which the user controls the access and the playback operations of selected material."

                          So, it would seem to me that there are many ways around this.

                          First of all, just auto-play the video/audio, and remove the controls.

                          Secondly, it can be argued that in the statement "The present invention relates generally to an audio and video transmission and receiving system" indicates that their patent only applies to actual transmission/receiving systems, which if you are only transmitting, and the user receives it on their own accord, this is not a true system, as it has not been planned out, nor has it been setup to be a system.

                          In addition, their patent states "Audio AND video transmission AND receiving system(singular)".

                          The symantics of that statement do not apply to all video and audio streaming.

                          But, if you want to bend over and let them tell you that you have to pay them for something that you've been doing for years... Go right ahead.

                          By the way, if you haven't started yet,
                          Send me all of your traffic,

                          Thanks in advance.
                          Pieces of flesh

                          Comment

                          • benthompson
                            Confirmed User
                            • Mar 2002
                            • 553

                            #14
                            no way!!
                            No signature.. I am bored of the signatures aswell..

                            Comment

                            • crockett
                              in a van by the river
                              • May 2003
                              • 76818

                              #15
                              dude this company is getting way out of hand they claim they have patents on everything

                              Acacia claims its patents cover just about every form of digital audio and video distribution. According to Berman, these kinds of activities violate Acacia's intellectual property rights: pushing MP3s from peer-to-peer groups, streaming newscasts from Internet radio sites and delivering movies through cable networks.

                              they are picking on the porn industry because it's easy... when are they going after Microsoft, or apple or Time Warner... this country is going to shit real fast... guess I'll have to move to Costa Rica soon
                              In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                              Comment

                              Working...