Quote:
Originally posted by charly
80% of the guys shooting content for the net could not shoot for magazines. Most of them want slides and they would not know where to start shooting/lighting for slides. Then the actual content requirement would be way beyond them. Let's face it, what the net accepts as content editors mostly would laugh at.
|
I wanted to comment on this too.
This is a accurate, and I can hear the ones who fit into this category now saying "who needs to be able to do print, this is just for the net." I am no photographer, but I know when I see something I like, and there is a MAJOR difference between some idiot who think he is a pimp and has a 5k camera, some lights and a chick getting naked that he would rather fuck than take good photos or video of and the guy who knows how to make the shoot flow, the girl smile, etc.. girls usually dont like pervs during shoots.
I have seen them too may times, more worried about wrapping up the shoot and trying to get a blowjob,...and have been around too many good photographers to not compliment on the difference between the two.
Not sure where I wanted to go with this, but wanted to comment
some jacko with a camera in a hotel, would SURELY be laughed at by some of the more experienced print work photographers etc...
