SexEducation.com

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fluid of Fuck Me
    Confirmed User
    • Jun 2003
    • 373

    #451
    Dave..don't bullshit me plz.

    I've been around too long and heard every newbie excuse.
    Fuck, I used to review boards for all of em back in the day and saw 100 newbies like you try this shit on this very board when it first opened (but I was manager of by that time.) I've owned nightclubs too, and heard every excuse there. I know when someone is trying to bullshit me.

    Maybe this is something that would look better if ya dropped it? I mean come on..month old Newbies have heard of Serge. He's run a very busy board with some big players on it. Anyone who is anyone has been by it at least once.

    See...ya exposed yourself.
    It's ok. Everyone bullshits once in awhile. You wanted to feel important and didn't think anyone here would know any different. But here's the thing..this industry remembers everything. EVERYTHIING. People read this, and look at ya like a flake, threatening businesses and the like.

    Shit..even if you own link lists, don't matter. Think your traffic would hurt me? Hell man, I took a year off and still had traffic coming in. Think about that. Unless you own google, don't threaten me. Cause honestly, even the hun (as big as he is) only controls a small percentage of overall adult traffic, and he'll be the first to admit it.

    Now play nice before you end up making such a memorable fool of yourself that people wonder about your sanity. (if they aren't already)

    Comment

    • Fluid of Fuck Me
      Confirmed User
      • Jun 2003
      • 373

      #452
      A smack?
      LMFAO


      Ok..do your damndest to smack me..plz

      Seriously son, if I wanted a joke, I'd have followed you to the bathroom and watched you take a leak.


      As far as nothing. Interesting..you can search back on webmaster boards for 4 yrs and find me. I can't find a single reference to you past june of this year. No domains past june either.
      No history. Are you hiding from something cowboy? Or are ya just that new.

      Did you get that book on how to be a player on a ws domain in a month?

      I'm done with ya newb...put up or shut up. Lets see ya put me out of business big mouth.

      Comment

      • l33t h4x0r
        So Fucking Banned
        • Jun 2003
        • 86

        #453
        lol.....
        you realy are a wanker, i dont search the boards, i dont waste my time trying to associate myself with nobodys, im here to make money fool.
        something you will learn intime.
        enough of your shit now child, im going to work
        i dont care who u know, who u think u know, i dont care who these "players" think they are, i can make my own cash , unlike you i dont need to associated myself with other morons for a sense of belonging and to show me how to make money

        Comment

        • Fluid of Fuck Me
          Confirmed User
          • Jun 2003
          • 373

          #454
          Congrats.

          After thinking it over I have come to a conclusion.

          You strike me as someone in need of attention and to feel big.
          Hence the threats against my business and me pesonally about 3 posts in. Coming on here strokes your fragile little ego. And it's easy to pretend in here. After all, how many of the regulars can use a whois to see that you don't own shit? (one to many for your luck tonight obviously.)

          I don't believe you're anyone in this industry. I pray you're not. Cause if this industry lets fragile little kids like you be active members of it then I think it's doomed. With your attitude and temper you shouldn't be allowed to drive let alone run a porn site which requires adult capabilities and restraint. Two things you severely lack.

          At first I just thought you must have had a really bad day. Cause I mean, what kind of business man charges in here like some kind of freak off his rocker spitting and cursing at people and threatening violence? But that's just it sadly, a freak off his rocker.
          (by the way..a player like you claimed would have emailed me or icq-d me. Players can find that info, and hate being public on the boards like this, they know that if they act like a jackass no one wants to send their program traffic anymore. Didn't I point that out about that paysite of yours in your sig? You know, the one with only two links pointing to it in google? )

          Which brings me to this....
          For threatening physical violence, threatening to end my career business and other childish bullshit. I've decided you'll be the first person I've put on ignore on any board. Not even the child pornographer got put on ignore, which means in the ranking of fucked up craniums, you're first. Congrats, the attention your ego craved lol.

          I would advise you to avoid webmaster shows. We tend to quickly weed out people like you in person. More quickly then on the boards.

          Basically to sum it all up. I don't have time to feed your infantile ego. And as my upload is close to being done, I'm going to goto bed and dream the dream of an adult webmaster who's business can't be touched by the rantings of a chat room pissant.

          Sweet dreams everyone

          Cya

          Comment

          • Webby
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Oct 2002
            • 14956

            #455
            Oh hell.. this is typical of GFY!!

            We got the usual stupid asses making fine distinctions on some laws... we got the scum of the earth in sexeducation spouting his warped ideas on "educating" children... sheesh.. gimme a break!!

            Read this and get it firmly placed into your thick sculls:


            (a) sexeducation operates/ed a child porn site under the guise of "sex education".

            (b) He has/had images that are clearly child porn under any standards. These include, for the benefit of the dim, images depicting anal sex with minors blah.

            (c) He is a convicted child molester.

            (d) There is a totally insignificant minor matter.. that of contravening section 2257.

            (e) He has published images which he had no rights to use.

            All of the above is NOT assumed - the details have been recorded but I am not gonna pander to the curiousity of idiots by publishing this and messing up some other action in progress.

            Finally, if you still don't get it... give everyone a break and fuck off out of this business - it could do with a break from total idiots who generally think they can come on the net and seriously earn a living without a clue as to what it is about and "assume" everything, clog up boards with stupid one-liners and get in the way.

            XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

            Comment

            • l33t h4x0r
              So Fucking Banned
              • Jun 2003
              • 86

              #456
              Congrats.

              After thinking it over I have come to a conclusion.

              You strike me as someone in need of attention and to feel big.
              Hence the threats against my business and me pesonally about 3 posts in. Coming on here strokes your fragile little ego. And it's easy to pretend in here. After all, how many of the regulars can use a whois to see that you don't own shit? (one to many for your luck tonight obviously.)

              I don't believe you're anyone in this industry. I pray you're not. Cause if this industry lets fragile little kids like you be active members of it then I think it's doomed. With your attitude and temper you shouldn't be allowed to drive let alone run a porn site which requires adult capabilities and restraint. Two things you severely lack.

              At first I just thought you must have had a really bad day. Cause I mean, what kind of business man charges in here like some kind of freak off his rocker spitting and cursing at people and threatening violence? But that's just it sadly, a freak off his rocker.
              (by the way..a player like you claimed would have emailed me or icq-d me. Players can find that info, and hate being public on the boards like this, they know that if they act like a jackass no one wants to send their program traffic anymore. Didn't I point that out about that paysite of yours in your sig? You know, the one with only two links pointing to it in google? )

              Which brings me to this....
              For threatening physical violence, threatening to end my career business and other childish bullshit. I've decided you'll be the first person I've put on ignore on any board. Not even the child pornographer got put on ignore, which means in the ranking of fucked up craniums, you're first. Congrats, the attention your ego craved lol.

              I would advise you to avoid webmaster shows. We tend to quickly weed out people like you in person. More quickly then on the boards.

              Basically to sum it all up. I don't have time to feed your infantile ego. And as my upload is close to being done, I'm going to goto bed and dream the dream of an adult webmaster who's business can't be touched by the rantings of a chat room pissant.

              Sweet dreams everyone

              Cya


              webby if all of that is 100% true then get him, fuck if i was in canada i would personly. but on gfy?

              Comment

              • Webby
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Oct 2002
                • 14956

                #457
                l33t h4x0r:

                webby if all of that is 100% true then get him, fuck if i was in canada i would personly. but on gfy?
                Yep.. tis all accurate .. can't say.. or should not say, much more at the moment.

                I would not say that about anyone unless it had foundation
                XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                Comment

                • WMD
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2003
                  • 56

                  #458
                  LONG LIVE "DAD" @ "sexeducation.com" !!!!!!!!

                  Comment

                  • Webby
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Oct 2002
                    • 14956

                    #459
                    WMD:

                    You sick fucking scumbag!!
                    XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                    Comment

                    • Webby
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • Oct 2002
                      • 14956

                      #460
                      Oddly enough... having read the "views" of sexeducation, his supposed "diverting" and avoidance of the facts - he has the same attitude as someone else I knew in a similar situation.

                      They too were "above the law" blah... but currently serving 12 years now on the Euro side of the Atlantic.
                      XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                      Comment

                      • Fluid of Fuck Me
                        Confirmed User
                        • Jun 2003
                        • 373

                        #461
                        I hope he's being sarcastic


                        Although it doesn't matter to me..it's a gorgeous day and I'm looking forward to some newbie running me out of business at any moment

                        Comment

                        • LadyMischief
                          Orgasms N Such!
                          • Sep 2002
                          • 18135

                          #462
                          You people want to see how fucking sick this guy is? Take a look at some of his domains, and explain what YOU think his real purpose is for them..

                          http://www.arewethereyet.com/

                          ICQ 3522039
                          Content Manager - orgasm.com
                          [email protected]

                          Comment

                          • sexeducation
                            So Fucking Banned
                            • Jun 2003
                            • 7315

                            #463
                            Originally posted by LadyMischief
                            You people want to see how fucking sick this guy is? Take a look at some of his domains, and explain what YOU think his real purpose is for them..

                            http://www.arewethereyet.com/
                            AreWeThereYet.com owned by a Lawyer in Calgary developed his own website. I have no connection to that site except for constantly keeping it going and requesting he move the dang thing to a new registrar and hosting company. I recently disabled that virtual account to ensure he moves it ...

                            master.Some-Name.com is the box name I use for hosting various domains ...

                            I believe most of the list of domains on master.Some-Name.com are still working ... however - I lost SexDiseases.com by failing to renew it on time. It should be removed from that page.




                            UPDATE:
                            I am calmer this morning.
                            I am trying to get my [email protected] email address working. Something weird is happening with it a the zone files level ...I think ... unsure...

                            I only have about 20 minutes before I have to go to work. But will reply to a few of the above posts.

                            Comment

                            • TurboAngel
                              H.B.I.C.
                              • Jun 2003
                              • 30122

                              #464

                              Comment

                              • LadyMischief
                                Orgasms N Such!
                                • Sep 2002
                                • 18135

                                #465
                                Funny how all those domains led to sexeducation.com..

                                But you know what? I'm gonna tell you this.. I'm gonna leave you alone now.. Why? Well first off, because you havent' listened to common sense in the beginning, and now that I'm done blowing off my steam, I don't feel like wasting time responding to you anymore.. You are going to get what's coming to you regardless of my ranting and raving, but as a parent I believe I have certainly been entitled to a highly inflated protective instinct.. Nothing I am saying here is going to change your mind, so you're just going to have to learn the hard way. Have fun getting hosting, good riddance to bad rubbish, and I sincerely hope that someday you learn even some small extent of the damage you have and can inflict on people with your actions, behavior and attitude. I don't suggest trying to teach "Sex Education" anymore, you are not a certified instructor.

                                You don't even get my best wishes, you just get my sincere wish that you stop.

                                ICQ 3522039
                                Content Manager - orgasm.com
                                [email protected]

                                Comment

                                • sexeducation
                                  So Fucking Banned
                                  • Jun 2003
                                  • 7315

                                  #466
                                  Originally posted by Webby
                                  Oh hell.. this is typical of GFY!!

                                  We got the usual stupid asses making fine distinctions on some laws... we got the scum of the earth in sexeducation spouting his warped ideas on "educating" children... sheesh.. gimme a break!!

                                  Read this and get it firmly placed into your thick sculls:


                                  (a) sexeducation operates/ed a child porn site under the guise of "sex education".

                                  (b) He has/had images that are clearly child porn under any standards. These include, for the benefit of the dim, images depicting anal sex with minors blah.

                                  (c) He is a convicted child molester.

                                  (d) There is a totally insignificant minor matter.. that of contravening section 2257.

                                  (e) He has published images which he had no rights to use.

                                  All of the above is NOT assumed - the details have been recorded but I am not gonna pander to the curiousity of idiots by publishing this and messing up some other action in progress.

                                  Finally, if you still don't get it... give everyone a break and fuck off out of this business - it could do with a break from total idiots who generally think they can come on the net and seriously earn a living without a clue as to what it is about and "assume" everything, clog up boards with stupid one-liners and get in the way.

                                  A) This is a complete fabrication - a complet lie.
                                  I do not distribute child pornography.
                                  I discuss how to shut those sites down.
                                  I have been banned by Overture.com because I banned email addresses that end in ".RU" from getting memberships on my website because IMO - RUSSIA is the biggest distributor of child pornography.

                                  When Overture.com came to review my website they declined my advertising campaign because I was openly against groups of people and quote to me in the email about the decline that I could not ban countries from getting a membership with SexEducation.com

                                  B) That is just complete BULLSHIT. I do not have ANY NOT ONE GRAPHIC OF A MINOR HAVE SEX ON MY WEBSITE - NOT ONE.
                                  I do have pictures of minors FULLY CLOTHED.
                                  Some sitting beside their fathers ...
                                  Some with AIDS sitting beside their mothers...

                                  C) I HAVE NEVER BEEN CONVICTED, CHARGED, INTERVIEWED, OR EVEN ACCUSED OF CHILD MOLESTATION. THIS IS A COMPLETE UNFOUNDED AND LIBELOUS STATEMENT. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED - REPEATEDLY - THAT THIS IS NOT TRUE.

                                  D)I USED TO HAVE A 2257 statement on the homepage of my website - and I do have - the source - or can source - the most controversial graphics on the website. I am not stupid - I know which graphics are causing the "emotions" ... those graphics are from a website like BarelyLegal.com (example only) ... which had 2257 statements ...

                                  E) A magazine has a right to quote publicly made statements.
                                  There may be a few errors in quoting the source of those statements/graphics ... I will be more diligent in doing so in the future.

                                  IN SUMMARY ...
                                  You have believed lies and unfounded statements about me ("convicted") ... and you are continuing to make libelous statements which are clearly - wrong .. slanderous and are now causing financial loss and emotional harm.

                                  Comment

                                  • JFPdude
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Jan 2002
                                    • 4027

                                    #467
                                    Originally posted by sexeducation


                                    AreWeThereYet.com owned by a Lawyer in Calgary developed his own website. I have no connection to that site except for constantly keeping it going and requesting he move the dang thing to a new registrar and hosting company. I recently disabled that virtual account to ensure he moves it ...

                                    master.Some-Name.com is the box name I use for hosting various domains ...

                                    I believe most of the list of domains on master.Some-Name.com are still working ... however - I lost SexDiseases.com by failing to renew it on time. It should be removed from that page.




                                    UPDATE:
                                    I am calmer this morning.
                                    I am trying to get my [email protected] email address working. Something weird is happening with it a the zone files level ...I think ... unsure...

                                    I only have about 20 minutes before I have to go to work. But will reply to a few of the above posts.



                                    It's a shame that your dns zone files are not working .... Hmm maybe people have contacted your HOSTS and alerted them to your scheme of hosting dns in one palce and domains at another and some things at yet another ?


                                    Have you contacted the abuse department at your hosts about your zone files ? I have a STRONG feeling they have a clue as to whats going on.

                                    Comment

                                    • JFPdude
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Jan 2002
                                      • 4027

                                      #468
                                      Originally posted by sexeducation

                                      D)I USED TO HAVE A 2257 statement on the homepage of my website - and I do have - the source - or can source - the most controversial graphics on the website. I am not stupid - I know which graphics are causing the "emotions" ... those graphics are from a website like BarelyLegal.com (example only) ... which had 2257 statements ...
                                      This is called hotlinking. Unless the pictures are directly licensed by the content seller to your site they are illegal for use on your site.

                                      This alone is reason enough to have your sites pulled.

                                      Comment

                                      • sexeducation
                                        So Fucking Banned
                                        • Jun 2003
                                        • 7315

                                        #469
                                        Originally posted by l33t h4x0r
                                        sexeducation, take it easy i dont know either way with you.
                                        but i wont judge you, its not my place nor the place of any vermin on this board.
                                        the "dad" thing makes me think though.
                                        why do you call yourself dad?
                                        I am a father of a teenage son.
                                        I am not a Doctor.
                                        I am male.

                                        My articles are written from a "Fathers" perspective.
                                        I also wanted to have a "[email protected]" to give a Mothers perspective.

                                        This is the first time ever that my handle has ever become an issue.

                                        Comment

                                        • JFPdude
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Jan 2002
                                          • 4027

                                          #470
                                          Also how do your mainstream customer(s) feel about your involvement with your illegal activities ...

                                          I can tell you how a few of them feel .... they bought new hosting today ... and not through me either because I refused to sell to them ... I didn't want to profit off your loss.
                                          Last edited by JFPdude; 07-09-2003, 07:51 AM.

                                          Comment

                                          • gothweb
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Jun 2002
                                            • 8849

                                            #471
                                            Originally posted by sexeducation



                                            D)I USED TO HAVE A 2257 statement on the homepage of my website - and I do have - the source - or can source - the most controversial graphics on the website. I am not stupid - I know which graphics are causing the "emotions" ... those graphics are from a website like BarelyLegal.com (example only) ... which had 2257 statements ...
                                            You are still showing a gross lack of understanding of this law. Let me know if you would like me to explain it to you.

                                            Photos by Ian X.: Distinctive photos of goth babes.
                                            Blood Money:Your traffic, my sites, our money.
                                            MojoHost: Still the best.

                                            Comment

                                            • sexeducation
                                              So Fucking Banned
                                              • Jun 2003
                                              • 7315

                                              #472
                                              Originally posted by sexeducation


                                              I am a father of a teenage son.
                                              I am not a Doctor.
                                              I am male.

                                              My articles are written from a "Fathers" perspective.
                                              I also wanted to have a "[email protected]" to give a Mothers perspective.

                                              This is the first time ever that my handle has ever become an issue.
                                              ADDENDUM:
                                              In fact - the article "Let Teens Have Sex" is a master piece (IMO) of teaching ABSTINENCE ... it really gets you going ... and then NAILS / PINS the reader with the last paragraph. It's awesome and one of the articles I recommend that PARENTS (ADULTS) read print and give to their teenagers.

                                              Comment

                                              • sexeducation
                                                So Fucking Banned
                                                • Jun 2003
                                                • 7315

                                                #473
                                                Originally posted by JFPdude





                                                It's a shame that your dns zone files are not working .... Hmm maybe people have contacted your HOSTS and alerted them to your scheme of hosting dns in one palce and domains at another and some things at yet another ?


                                                Have you contacted the abuse department at your hosts about your zone files ? I have a STRONG feeling they have a clue as to whats going on.
                                                You know the friggen registrar transfer hassle.
                                                My domains are scattered not by choice - but because it's a friggen pain to get them consolidated.

                                                I have some at eNom.com not because I want some there but because I have attempted numerous bloody times ... to get the damn domain I bought from someone who used eNom.com as the registrar ...

                                                Registrar transfers are bloody pain.

                                                NO SCHEME ... just a continued "witch hunt" and continuous slander of unfounded circumstancial evidence.

                                                Comment

                                                • LadyMischief
                                                  Orgasms N Such!
                                                  • Sep 2002
                                                  • 18135

                                                  #474
                                                  Originally posted by sexeducation


                                                  You know the friggen registrar transfer hassle.
                                                  My domains are scattered not by choice - but because it's a friggen pain to get them consolidated.

                                                  I have some at eNom.com not because I want some there but because I have attempted numerous bloody times ... to get the damn domain I bought from someone who used eNom.com as the registrar ...

                                                  Registrar transfers are bloody pain.

                                                  NO SCHEME ... just a continued "witch hunt" and continuous slander of unfounded circumstancial evidence.
                                                  Apparently you seem for get that hosts might possibly have access and might just investigate what you host on their servers.

                                                  ICQ 3522039
                                                  Content Manager - orgasm.com
                                                  [email protected]

                                                  Comment

                                                  • JFPdude
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Jan 2002
                                                    • 4027

                                                    #475
                                                    Originally posted by sexeducation


                                                    You know the friggen registrar transfer hassle.
                                                    My domains are scattered not by choice - but because it's a friggen pain to get them consolidated.

                                                    I have some at eNom.com not because I want some there but because I have attempted numerous bloody times ... to get the damn domain I bought from someone who used eNom.com as the registrar ...

                                                    Registrar transfers are bloody pain.

                                                    NO SCHEME ... just a continued "witch hunt" and continuous slander of unfounded circumstancial evidence.

                                                    Huh ???

                                                    Please explain ... some people on this board own more than 500 domains myself included yet I fail to see what your talking about.

                                                    Regsiter domain
                                                    find hosting
                                                    hosting company sets up dns for those domains
                                                    contact registrar with dns servers hosting company provides you with

                                                    seems like a simple process to me

                                                    Comment

                                                    • sexeducation
                                                      So Fucking Banned
                                                      • Jun 2003
                                                      • 7315

                                                      #476
                                                      Originally posted by JFPdude


                                                      This is called hotlinking. Unless the pictures are directly licensed by the content seller to your site they are illegal for use on your site.

                                                      This alone is reason enough to have your sites pulled.
                                                      NO - I DO NOT HOT LINK and steal another servers bandwidth.

                                                      A magazine has a right to quote publicly made statements. A global magazine of sexual intercourse has a right to quote publicly made text, graphic and video statements.

                                                      To my understand from reading AdmiralKrags posts ...

                                                      And we all know that most adult webmasters which include the domain name on the graphic - then post that graphic into usenet - are advertising - and most do not care if the get swapped around because - IT IS ADVERTISING.

                                                      SexEducation.com will continue to quote publicly made statements - that's what all newspapers/magazines do.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • JFPdude
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • Jan 2002
                                                        • 4027

                                                        #477
                                                        Originally posted by sexeducation


                                                        NO - I DO NOT HOT LINK and steal another servers bandwidth.

                                                        A magazine has a right to quote publicly made statements. A global magazine of sexual intercourse has a right to quote publicly made text, graphic and video statements.

                                                        To my understand from reading AdmiralKrags posts ...

                                                        And we all know that most adult webmasters which include the domain name on the graphic - then post that graphic into usenet - are advertising - and most do not care if the get swapped around because - IT IS ADVERTISING.

                                                        SexEducation.com will continue to quote publicly made statements - that's what all newspapers/magazines do.

                                                        It has no right to quote graphics or movies from another site specially when those graphics or movies contain sexually explicit material.

                                                        This is all covered by laws that you apparently do not understand.

                                                        YOU MUST HAVE A LICENSE FOR ANY SUCH MATERIALS.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • sexeducation
                                                          So Fucking Banned
                                                          • Jun 2003
                                                          • 7315

                                                          #478
                                                          Originally posted by JFPdude



                                                          Huh ???

                                                          Please explain ... some people on this board own more than 500 domains myself included yet I fail to see what your talking about.

                                                          Regsiter domain
                                                          find hosting
                                                          hosting company sets up dns for those domains
                                                          contact registrar with dns servers hosting company provides you with

                                                          seems like a simple process to me

                                                          No no ... buy a domain from a person using registrar "A" and then have that domain transfered to registrar "B" to consolidate all domains in one location.

                                                          Yes - I do register all my domains in one location for easy administration.

                                                          However - I have no choice of the registrar when I PURCHASE a domain - like SexEducation.NET and SexEducation.ORG which Verio.com can confirm .... I have tried to use their backroom to bring into the Verio.com domain system.

                                                          The are scattered because friggen registrars make "user unfriendly" to KEEP THEIR FRIGGEN RENEWAL FEE's.

                                                          If you have not experienced the registrar hassle - then you are a newbie.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • JFPdude
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Jan 2002
                                                            • 4027

                                                            #479
                                                            Originally posted by sexeducation



                                                            No no ... buy a domain from a person using registrar "A" and then have that domain transfered to registrar "B" to consolidate all domains in one location.

                                                            Yes - I do register all my domains in one location for easy administration.

                                                            However - I have no choice of the registrar when I PURCHASE a domain - like SexEducation.NET and SexEducation.ORG which Verio.com can confirm .... I have tried to use their backroom to bring into the Verio.com domain system.

                                                            The are scattered because friggen registrars make "user unfriendly" to KEEP THEIR FRIGGEN RENEWAL FEE's.

                                                            If you have not experienced the registrar hassle - then you are a newbie.

                                                            Yes your right I am a newbie when it comes to hosting and registering domains .... thanks for pointing that out to me.

                                                            By your statements and not doing the homework I assigned you last night you just made yourself look like an assclown.

                                                            Should we continue ?

                                                            Comment

                                                            • sexeducation
                                                              So Fucking Banned
                                                              • Jun 2003
                                                              • 7315

                                                              #480
                                                              Originally posted by LadyMischief


                                                              Apparently you seem for get that hosts might possibly have access and might just investigate what you host on their servers.
                                                              I forget nothing LADYFUCK ...
                                                              Of course my suppliers for hosting have access to the entire server and to all my log files. Which LADYFUCK ... the log files of my website is the absolute conclusive proof ... that I have never distributed child pornography ...GFY LADYFUCK ...

                                                              Comment

                                                              • sexeducation
                                                                So Fucking Banned
                                                                • Jun 2003
                                                                • 7315

                                                                #481
                                                                Originally posted by JFPdude



                                                                Yes your right I am a newbie when it comes to hosting and registering domains .... thanks for pointing that out to me.

                                                                By your statements and not doing the homework I assigned you last night you just made yourself look like an assclown.

                                                                Should we continue ?
                                                                My experience with registrar transfers is true and correct.
                                                                Your's may be different and the process may be easier now.
                                                                But I believe it was 6 to 9 months ago I tried to transfer SexEducation.ORG into the Verio.com backroom.

                                                                But is was within 60 days of renewal or some other BS reason and was therefore declined. I had to pay on both sides to affect the transfer ... a money grab ...imo

                                                                Comment

                                                                • JFPdude
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • Jan 2002
                                                                  • 4027

                                                                  #482
                                                                  The process has been the same way for as many years as I have been a hosting administrator.

                                                                  Hint Hint ... done your homework yet?

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • LadyMischief
                                                                    Orgasms N Such!
                                                                    • Sep 2002
                                                                    • 18135

                                                                    #483
                                                                    Originally posted by sexeducation


                                                                    My experience with registrar transfers is true and correct.
                                                                    Your's may be different and the process may be easier now.
                                                                    But I believe it was 6 to 9 months ago I tried to transfer SexEducation.ORG into the Verio.com backroom.

                                                                    But is was within 60 days of renewal or some other BS reason and was therefore declined. I had to pay on both sides to affect the transfer ... a money grab ...imo
                                                                    Did you bother to check his sig and put two and two together? Or are you REALLY that stupid? This is an honest question.

                                                                    ICQ 3522039
                                                                    Content Manager - orgasm.com
                                                                    [email protected]

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • sexeducation
                                                                      So Fucking Banned
                                                                      • Jun 2003
                                                                      • 7315

                                                                      #484
                                                                      Originally posted by JFPdude



                                                                      It has no right to quote graphics or movies from another site specially when those graphics or movies contain sexually explicit material.

                                                                      This is all covered by laws that you apparently do not understand.

                                                                      YOU MUST HAVE A LICENSE FOR ANY SUCH MATERIALS.
                                                                      If all I did was collect graphics and present them as a graphics collection - then you would be right.

                                                                      However, I do not do that - I discuss the graphics/video in the context of the magazine and provide the source of message (graphic or other) being discussed.

                                                                      In other words ... a newspaper photographer can jump in his car and take a picture of a billboard and publish that "picture of public advertising" in their newspaper.

                                                                      Are you saying that newspapers can no longer discuss what other newspapers are printing or presenting or advertsing?

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • mule
                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                        • Jan 2002
                                                                        • 6085

                                                                        #485
                                                                        Originally posted by sexeducation


                                                                        If all I did was collect graphics and present them as a graphics collection - then you would be right.

                                                                        However, I do not do that - I discuss the graphics/video in the context of the magazine and provide the source of message (graphic or other) being discussed.

                                                                        In other words ... a newspaper photographer can jump in his car and take a picture of a billboard and publish that "picture of public advertising" in their newspaper.

                                                                        Are you saying that newspapers can no longer discuss what other newspapers are printing or presenting or advertsing?
                                                                        So if you weren't doing anything wrong, how come your host shut you down?
                                                                        Converting like a mofo

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • LadyMischief
                                                                          Orgasms N Such!
                                                                          • Sep 2002
                                                                          • 18135

                                                                          #486
                                                                          Originally posted by sexeducation


                                                                          If all I did was collect graphics and present them as a graphics collection - then you would be right.

                                                                          However, I do not do that - I discuss the graphics/video in the context of the magazine and provide the source of message (graphic or other) being discussed.

                                                                          In other words ... a newspaper photographer can jump in his car and take a picture of a billboard and publish that "picture of public advertising" in their newspaper.

                                                                          Are you saying that newspapers can no longer discuss what other newspapers are printing or presenting or advertsing?
                                                                          You're very ignorant of the law and specifically of copyright law and fair use policies. Here's some homework for you.

                                                                          http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-42/
                                                                          Before you spout another word, go read that in it's ENTIRETY. Then come back and tell us how informed you are. I've read it and studied it front to back for years... How about you, tough guy?

                                                                          ICQ 3522039
                                                                          Content Manager - orgasm.com
                                                                          [email protected]

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • sexeducation
                                                                            So Fucking Banned
                                                                            • Jun 2003
                                                                            • 7315

                                                                            #487
                                                                            I have to go to work.
                                                                            Have a good day.
                                                                            POOF

                                                                            John E. Beacock
                                                                            [email protected]
                                                                            1-403-619-2739

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • LadyMischief
                                                                              Orgasms N Such!
                                                                              • Sep 2002
                                                                              • 18135

                                                                              #488
                                                                              Originally posted by mule

                                                                              So if you weren't doing anything wrong, how come your host shut you down?
                                                                              It's a witchunt dontcha know sweetie?

                                                                              ICQ 3522039
                                                                              Content Manager - orgasm.com
                                                                              [email protected]

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • JFPdude
                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                • Jan 2002
                                                                                • 4027

                                                                                #489
                                                                                Newspapers do not post pictures of porn ... the laws forbid it ... GET A CLUE.

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • sexeducation
                                                                                  So Fucking Banned
                                                                                  • Jun 2003
                                                                                  • 7315

                                                                                  #490
                                                                                  Originally posted by LadyMischief


                                                                                  You're very ignorant of the law and specifically of copyright law and fair use policies. Here's some homework for you.

                                                                                  http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-42/
                                                                                  Before you spout another word, go read that in it's ENTIRETY. Then come back and tell us how informed you are. I've read it and studied it front to back for years... How about you, tough guy?
                                                                                  Will do when I get back. LADYFUCK ...
                                                                                  But off to my job now...
                                                                                  POOF

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • JFPdude
                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                    • Jan 2002
                                                                                    • 4027

                                                                                    #491
                                                                                    Originally posted by sexeducation
                                                                                    I have to go to work.
                                                                                    Have a good day.
                                                                                    POOF

                                                                                    John E. Beacock
                                                                                    [email protected]
                                                                                    1-403-619-2739

                                                                                    Yes we know McDonalds needs clean bathrooms as clueless as you are I can't see they hired you to work the counter.

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • DJRCyberAVS
                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                      • Jul 2002
                                                                                      • 493

                                                                                      #492
                                                                                      Originally posted by JFPdude
                                                                                      The process has been the same way for as many years as I have been a hosting administrator.

                                                                                      Hint Hint ... done your homework yet?
                                                                                      Wasting your breath mate... he's a prick and ain't going to listen.... If he can't grasp stealing content is wrong and all the other shit after 10 PAGES, it'll take you another 150 posts to get him to go and look at domain name issues.

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • candyflip
                                                                                        Carpe Visio
                                                                                        • Jul 2002
                                                                                        • 43074

                                                                                        #493
                                                                                        Can someone post all the proof of these allegations here on this page? I don't feel like reading everything, but get the jist of what's going on here. I've seen some pretty harsh accusations, and no real hard proof. Thanks

                                                                                        Spend you some brain.
                                                                                        Email Me

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • JFPdude
                                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                                          • Jan 2002
                                                                                          • 4027

                                                                                          #494
                                                                                          Originally posted by candyflip
                                                                                          Can someone post all the proof of these allegations here on this page? I don't feel like reading everything, but get the jist of what's going on here. I've seen some pretty harsh accusations, and no real hard proof. Thanks

                                                                                          We refuse to post the screen caps of the child porn that was on his site. However many screencaps were taken and sent to the calgary police department.

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • JFPdude
                                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                                            • Jan 2002
                                                                                            • 4027

                                                                                            #495
                                                                                            As for him flying under the radar on where he was hosted if you fdo a whois on sexeducation.com it comes back on verio nameservers IE: ns1.secure.net and ns2.secure.net

                                                                                            Further investigation showed that he was only hosting the dns there when in fact his real server he was hosting on belongs to rackshack.net as the domain resolved to an ip of 64.246.44.170 as do all his other domains.

                                                                                            To date through our complaints and showing of proof verio has pulled his dns. He has since registered with 3 hosting providers that I know of trying to find new hosting for his dns however they have all been aware of this thread and the proof and he has been unsuccessful in finding new hosting for the dns.

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • LadyMischief
                                                                                              Orgasms N Such!
                                                                                              • Sep 2002
                                                                                              • 18135

                                                                                              #496
                                                                                              Originally posted by sexeducation


                                                                                              Will do when I get back. LADYFUCK ...
                                                                                              But off to my job now...
                                                                                              POOF
                                                                                              well now THAT'S appreciation for ya. heh!

                                                                                              ICQ 3522039
                                                                                              Content Manager - orgasm.com
                                                                                              [email protected]

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • Tipsy
                                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                                • Jul 2001
                                                                                                • 6989

                                                                                                #497
                                                                                                Let's guess his job shall we? I plump for one of the following...

                                                                                                Scout leader, school caretaker, priest, childrens entertainer.
                                                                                                Ignorance is never bliss.

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • malakajoe
                                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                                  • Feb 2003
                                                                                                  • 1751

                                                                                                  #498
                                                                                                  Originally posted by sexeducation


                                                                                                  If all I did was collect graphics and present them as a graphics collection - then you would be right.

                                                                                                  However, I do not do that - I discuss the graphics/video in the context of the magazine and provide the source of message (graphic or other) being discussed.

                                                                                                  In other words ... a newspaper photographer can jump in his car and take a picture of a billboard and publish that "picture of public advertising" in their newspaper.

                                                                                                  Are you saying that newspapers can no longer discuss what other newspapers are printing or presenting or advertsing?
                                                                                                  I think this guy is onto a great business strategy. Create a sex "newspaper" and use others photo sets but just make sure you write an article about it. Damn, Playboy is doing it all wrong paying bucks for photos. They can just use others and change there format to a "newspaper".

                                                                                                  We never have to buy content or pay models again if we follow this. Just think of the possibilities.
                                                                                                  Selfpleasure.com for sale on auction. Closes on Tuesday March 11th at 9pm PST!!!!

                                                                                                  Dirty enough to be good, but clean enough for everyone!
                                                                                                  ------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                                                  Moral Police - First graduating class coming soon! - Forcing our values across the internet

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • sexeducation
                                                                                                    So Fucking Banned
                                                                                                    • Jun 2003
                                                                                                    • 7315

                                                                                                    #499
                                                                                                    Originally posted by malakajoe


                                                                                                    I think this guy is onto a great business strategy. Create a sex "newspaper" and use others photo sets but just make sure you write an article about it. Damn, Playboy is doing it all wrong paying bucks for photos. They can just use others and change there format to a "newspaper".

                                                                                                    We never have to buy content or pay models again if we follow this. Just think of the possibilities.

                                                                                                    You did not answer the question though ... as usual.

                                                                                                    Can a newspaper take a picture of a billboard on the side of a road and discuss that billboard with a picture of it ... in it's newspaper?

                                                                                                    You did not answer the question.

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    • LadyMischief
                                                                                                      Orgasms N Such!
                                                                                                      • Sep 2002
                                                                                                      • 18135

                                                                                                      #500
                                                                                                      Originally posted by sexeducation



                                                                                                      You did not answer the question though ... as usual.

                                                                                                      Can a newspaper take a picture of a billboard on the side of a road and discuss that billboard with a picture of it ... in it's newspaper?

                                                                                                      You did not answer the question.
                                                                                                      THAT has absolutely nothing to do with fair use.. if you had taken the time to review that link i posted (which is the Canadian copyright act in it's entirety, INCLUDING fair use policies) you would realize that your applications are in violation.

                                                                                                      Read up, bub.

                                                                                                      ICQ 3522039
                                                                                                      Content Manager - orgasm.com
                                                                                                      [email protected]

                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                      Working...