|
Threads like this make you wonder if there are ANY honest sponsors out there...
Sure it's easy to see how this particular software is problematic and unless I missed something, it's only aimed at MPA2 users. But as someone else pointed out, there are other ways to audit program honesty. And in our whole industry, still not a single sponsor uses any of them?
It's hard to believe no-one can see the edge they would get from proving their honesty. Some webmasters think an email or ICQ conversation means you know who you are doing business with. Yeah right. Others still buy into "it's the bottom line, not the shave that matters". But is it so hard to believe that auditing costs would be covered many times over, pulling in webmasters who do care that programs are honest?
|