"Worse than Watergate?"

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Webby
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Oct 2002
    • 14956

    #201
    theking:

    "No.. you did not respond - that is an actual fact!"
    And I still maintain the above... I've seen it repeatedly.. not just on this thread, but many others...

    For clarity... YOU DO NOT ACTUALLY RESPOND TO FUCK ALL unless it is some sidetrack in "defence of the US".

    I have rebutted this multiple times.
    I have rebutted this multiple times.
    I have rebutted this multiple times.
    I am aware of that article and many others like it and I have rebutted what it, and other articles like it, says and does not say.
    All you do is rebutt things based on your own warped ideas which bear zero relation to reality.... Everyone, including your own government and media is wrong (did you realise that is what you are saying?? *g*).

    SO.. ONCE AGAIN for the mentality backward.... YOU DO NOT ACTUALLY RESPOND in any balanced and sensible way comments.
    XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

    Comment

    • theking
      Nice Kitty
      • Sep 2002
      • 21053

      #202
      Originally posted by Centurion


      I've been posting all day (and all night now) with facts!
      You've been posting with your OPINION. You've also gone to GREAT lengths to avoid any DIRECT answers to question put to you.

      Saying "you're too stupid for me to deal with" is really a person saying "Shit..I'm in a corner now and don't have anything left in my arsenal to use, so I'll call him STUPID!"

      Is your selective memory NOW going to tell us you DO NOT remember the great campaign that Bush undertook BEFORE the way began that the United States would DISARM Iraq? Remember how Bush used time after time the term "Weapons of Mass Destruction"? You don't remember Bush EVER saying we are going in to Iraq to DISARM IRAQ's Weapons of Mass Destruction.

      You can't even say: "The WMD got blowed up by the big airplane bombs. That's why they can't find them now"?

      You never did have the guts, courage, or even the backbone it takes to admit these WMDs NEVER existed, and that's why we can't find them now and why Saddam never used them.

      You just can't bring yourself to say that..to tell the truth can you?
      Every thing that you have posed in the above post I have answered repeatedly as you fucking idiots keep repeating the same questions over and over.

      Originally posted by theking


      I am aware of that article and many others like it and I have rebutted what it, and other articles like it, says and does not say. I am tired of repeating myself over and over. I am not any longer going to rebut point by point the same BS that I have repeatedly rebutted, that is posted by anti American Foreigners, or anti Administration hatrers, or idiots that do not comprehend what they are reading and try to twist it into saying something that fits their anti American or anti Administration agenda.
      I already told you to read it...learn it...know it. If you want answers...search my posts as your BS questions have been repeated by others over and over...try being unique and I may respond or then again I may not...because for you and the other dummies like you there are not any acceptable answers. I am finished fucking with you.
      Last edited by theking; 06-09-2003, 01:40 AM.
      When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

      FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

      Comment

      • Webby
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Oct 2002
        • 14956

        #203
        ah, behold: step two in theking's tactics. When people stop swallowing the evasions and denials, belittle them.
        Yea.. that mentality is just that of an imbecile.. I reckon the King of Denial would be a totally different character if he came out of the protective cover of his PC... Doubt in a face to face anyone would give him five seconds of time!!
        XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

        Comment

        • Centurion
          Confirmed User
          • Dec 2002
          • 6033

          #204
          Originally posted by theking


          I already told you to read it...learn it...know it. If you want answers...search my posts as your BS questions have been repeated by others over and over...try being unique and I may respond or then again I may not...because for you and the other dummies like you there are not any acceptable answers. I am finished fucking with you.
          I'm not going to run around this forum reading everything posted to get your ANSWERS!

          I've asked you simply & clearly:WERE THERE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION THREATENING THE UNITED STATES AND LOCATED IN IRAQ?

          Let's narrow the list down to ONE question..maybe asking two questions confused you!

          Can you answer that simple question with a simple answer?

          Comment

          • Webby
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Oct 2002
            • 14956

            #205
            King of Denial:

            All I see is your elevated opinions when you "attempt" to answer anything - this sounds very much like that idiot in the Whitehouse who went to war on "opinions"
            XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

            Comment

            • Webby
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Oct 2002
              • 14956

              #206
              WERE THERE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION THREATENING THE UNITED STATES AND LOCATED IN IRAQ?
              Now... this "should" be easy... but wait for it
              XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

              Comment

              • Webby
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Oct 2002
                • 14956

                #207
                mmm.. must be harder than I thought...

                Wonder if another easier question is in order... Have the US Admin ever lied since Bush was elected Fuhrer?
                XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                Comment

                • Centurion
                  Confirmed User
                  • Dec 2002
                  • 6033

                  #208
                  To "The King":


                  I'm going to bed now. But before I leave, I will leave my one simple question for you to answer since it appears you suffer from M.A.D.

                  I'm looking forward to your answer when I check in tomorrow.
                  Just for you, ONE more time, here is THE question you are being asked to answer:

                  WERE THERE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION LOCATED IN IRAQ THAT WERE THREATENING THE UNITED STATES?

                  I'm quite confident you will finally answer THE question and show the world that YOU are RIGHT and that I am WRONG on this issue of WMDs!

                  Comment

                  • theking
                    Nice Kitty
                    • Sep 2002
                    • 21053

                    #209
                    Originally posted by Centurion


                    I'm not going to run around this forum reading everything posted to get your ANSWERS!

                    I've asked you simply & clearly:WERE THERE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION THREATENING THE UNITED STATES AND LOCATED IN IRAQ?

                    Let's narrow the list down to ONE question..maybe asking two questions confused you!

                    Can you answer that simple question with a simple answer?
                    There are two questions in that sentence dumb fuck.

                    Iraq never possessed WMD's that were a threat to the US through military deployment...only a threat via terrorist tactics.

                    Yes there were WMD's in Iraq...from '91 to '98 the inspectors over saw the destruction of what they estimated to be around 90% of the WMD's. The 15 nations of the security counsel via resolution 1441 demanded that Iraq account for the remaining WMD and/or materials. Iraq failed to do this. I repeat yes there were WMD's and or WMD material in Iraq.

                    You now have two clear answers...if you don't like the answers then
                    Last edited by theking; 06-09-2003, 01:56 AM.
                    When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                    FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                    Comment

                    • theking
                      Nice Kitty
                      • Sep 2002
                      • 21053

                      #210
                      Originally posted by Webby
                      King of Denial:

                      All I see is your elevated opinions when you "attempt" to answer anything - this sounds very much like that idiot in the Whitehouse who went to war on "opinions"
                      "All I see..." That is because you see what you want to see and I remind you that you do not have any credibility because you can not even keep track of what is said from post to post.
                      When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                      FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                      Comment

                      • Webby
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Oct 2002
                        • 14956

                        #211
                        theking:

                        Iraq never possessed WMD's that were a threat to the US through military deployment...only a threat via terrorist tactics.
                        This "almost" actually answered the question. The rest is dribble of your own making.

                        Now... can you specify your claim of "only a threat via terrorist tactics." since this has never appeared in *any* evidence either from your own government or others.

                        Please elaborate on this fresh opinion you have... thank you
                        XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                        Comment

                        • Webby
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Oct 2002
                          • 14956

                          #212
                          theking:

                          I sure prefer "All I see" myself to your deviant BS
                          XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                          Comment

                          • Webby
                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                            • Oct 2002
                            • 14956

                            #213
                            Forget it!! What the fuck am I wasting time with some idiot on a chat board for???
                            XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                            Comment

                            • theking
                              Nice Kitty
                              • Sep 2002
                              • 21053

                              #214
                              Originally posted by Webby
                              theking:



                              This "almost" actually answered the question. The rest is dribble of your own making.

                              Now... can you specify your claim of "only a threat via terrorist tactics." since this has never appeared in *any* evidence either from your own government or others.

                              Please elaborate on this fresh opinion you have... thank you
                              No one in the Administration ever said that Iraq posed any kind of military threat to the US and any idiot that keeps track of military capabilities of the various countries would know that Iraq posed no military threat. The Administration stated that WMD's or WMD materials could get into the hands of terrorists...and since Saddam was an enemy of the US this was a real and serious concern.
                              When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                              FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                              Comment

                              • jeroman
                                So Fucking Banned
                                • Oct 2002
                                • 356

                                #215
                                Originally posted by Mr.Fiction


                                Would Bush have to get a blowjob to make you care about his lying?

                                Comment

                                • Webby
                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                  • Oct 2002
                                  • 14956

                                  #216
                                  theking:

                                  The Administration stated that WMD's or WMD materials could get into the hands of terrorists...
                                  DUH??? What WMD???? Do you sit and absorb all the BS that the "Administration" comes out with??? Take a tip and adopt the same attitude as other countries... "assume anything that comes out of Washington is a lie until it is actually verified".

                                  In case you don't know... there is no evidence of WMD so what the fuck are you talking about with "WMD materials could get into the hands of terrorists"??

                                  Sorry... I got a real life to go to now...
                                  XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                                  Comment

                                  • theking
                                    Nice Kitty
                                    • Sep 2002
                                    • 21053

                                    #217
                                    Originally posted by Webby
                                    theking:



                                    DUH??? What WMD???? Do you sit and absorb all the BS that the "Administration" comes out with??? Take a tip and adopt the same attitude as other countries... "assume anything that comes out of Washington is a lie until it is actually verified".

                                    In case you don't know... there is no evidence of WMD so what the fuck are you talking about with "WMD materials could get into the hands of terrorists"??

                                    Sorry... I got a real life to go to now...
                                    The remaining WMD's/materials that Iraq admitted to having and claimed they destroyed after the inspectors left in '98. Of course they offered zero proof that they destroyed them as they claimed.
                                    When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                    FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                    Comment

                                    • Webby
                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                      • Oct 2002
                                      • 14956

                                      #218
                                      The remaining WMD's/materials that Iraq admitted to having and claimed they destroyed after the inspectors left in '98. Of course they offered zero proof that they destroyed them as they claimed.
                                      Ah... these WMD!!!

                                      Once again... there is no evidence of WMD... so what the fuck are you talking about??

                                      Your friends at the "Admin" did however submit a load of fraudulent documents to make such "solid" claims and lie with other issues on this... but... once again.. there are no weapons, so, ask yourself, "what the fuck were they talking about?"

                                      All more BS!!
                                      XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                                      Comment

                                      • theking
                                        Nice Kitty
                                        • Sep 2002
                                        • 21053

                                        #219
                                        Originally posted by Webby


                                        Ah... these WMD!!!

                                        Once again... there is no evidence of WMD... so what the fuck are you talking about??

                                        Your friends at the "Admin" did however submit a load of fraudulent documents to make such "solid" claims and lie with other issues on this... but... once again.. there are no weapons, so, ask yourself, "what the fuck were they talking about?"

                                        All more BS!!
                                        15 members of the security counsel agreed that Iraq had to prove that they in fact had destroyed the remaining WMD's/materials which they had in their possesion when the inspectors left in '98. Iraq failed to do so...so what did they do with the WMD's/materials...oh I know...they "claimed" that they destroyed them. Saddam would still be in power if he would have offered up proof of this claim...in the form of documents...or physical proof...or the scientists and other personell that would have been involved in the destruction.
                                        When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                        FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                        Comment

                                        • sacX
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Dec 2002
                                          • 2998

                                          #220
                                          September 11 scared the US and the rest of the world, but the US especially.. It appears to me Bush and co. used this fear to motivate the public against Iraq...(this is obvious surely?)

                                          At present it appears this scaremongering was simply that, but the people who bought into it are too embarrassed to admit they were hoodwinked so they try distraction.. e.g. "I don't think WMD's was the reason for invading Iraq"

                                          Of course WMD's may still be found, the world would ironically be a nicer place if they were found, as it would mean the world isn't controlled by liars.
                                          Have Asian Language Traffic?

                                          Comment

                                          • mule
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Jan 2002
                                            • 6085

                                            #221
                                            Originally posted by theking


                                            15 members of the security counsel agreed that Iraq had to prove that they in fact had destroyed the remaining WMD's/materials which they had in their possesion when the inspectors left in '98. Iraq failed to do so...so what did they do with the WMD's/materials...oh I know...they "claimed" that they destroyed them. Saddam would still be in power if he would have offered up proof of this claim...in the form of documents...or physical proof...or the scientists and other personell that would have been involved in the destruction.
                                            So how the fuck was Saddam supposed to prove that they don't exist, when the US, after tearing the country apart for over a month now, can't prove that they do exist? Go dodge cars on a highway somewhere
                                            Converting like a mofo

                                            Comment

                                            • Webby
                                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                                              • Oct 2002
                                              • 14956

                                              #222
                                              MMM... so the US in it's wisdom, decided to go to war and find all these WMD... I understand now - thank you

                                              and since Saddam was an enemy of the US this was a real and serious concern.
                                              And can you explain what made Saddam "an enemy of the US"?? I never knew he invaded the US or threatened to send any of these "claimed" loads of missles to the US. Your opinion is always appreciated
                                              XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                                              Comment

                                              • Webby
                                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                • Oct 2002
                                                • 14956

                                                #223
                                                mule:

                                                So how the fuck was Saddam supposed to prove that they don't exist, when the US, after tearing the country apart for over a month now, can't prove that they do exist? Go dodge cars on a highway somewhere
                                                Yea.. I noticed this lack of logic sometimes
                                                XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                                                Comment

                                                • theking
                                                  Nice Kitty
                                                  • Sep 2002
                                                  • 21053

                                                  #224
                                                  Originally posted by mule

                                                  So how the fuck was Saddam supposed to prove that they don't exist, when the US, after tearing the country apart for over a month now, can't prove that they do exist? Go dodge cars on a highway somewhere
                                                  Dense as a fucking "mule"...I have answered this question multiple times and even a stupid fucking mule should fiqure it out. Number one Iraq was a keeper of documents...they had zero documents about the destruction of the remaining WMD's/materials left from '98...they made the ridiculous claim that the documents had also been destroyed. There would have been a location/locations for the destruction and there would have been physical proof of the destruction...they did not provide a single location or any physical evidence for any destruction of any WMD's or WMD materials. There would have been scientists and other personell involved in the destruction and they did not provide a single person that was involved in the destruction...but yet maintained their claim that they had destroyed them. BS.
                                                  When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                  FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                  Comment

                                                  • Webby
                                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                    • Oct 2002
                                                    • 14956

                                                    #225
                                                    sacX:

                                                    as it would mean the world isn't controlled by liars.
                                                    Sadly it is not lies to do with WMD ... they've been lying and LOADS more stuff since about 10 days after the election of the "War President" whom we all adore!!

                                                    It genuinely is a rogue regime... and running fast downhill in it's adolescent claims of Empire
                                                    XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • mule
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Jan 2002
                                                      • 6085

                                                      #226
                                                      Originally posted by theking


                                                      Dense as a fucking "mule"...I have answered this question multiple times and even a stupid fucking mule should fiqure it out. Number one Iraq was a keeper of documents...they had zero documents about the destruction of the remaining WMD's/materials left from '98...they made the ridiculous claim that the documents had also been destroyed. There would have been a location/locations for the destruction and there would have been physical proof of the destruction...they did not provide a single location or any physical evidence for any destruction of any WMD's or WMD materials. There would have been scientists and other personell involved in the destruction and they did not provide a single person that was involved in the destruction...but yet maintained their claim that they had destroyed them. BS.
                                                      LOL, how often have you said that you'll never respond to me again?
                                                      You don't have to answer, that was a rhetorical question.
                                                      Answer this one instead: Based on satellite surveilance and other intelligence, the Bush administration had "irrefutable proof" of the existance and locations of the alleged WMD's. Why are they missing now? If they were moved, why did this incredible intelligence-gathering machine fail to register it?
                                                      Converting like a mofo

                                                      Comment

                                                      • theking
                                                        Nice Kitty
                                                        • Sep 2002
                                                        • 21053

                                                        #227
                                                        Originally posted by Webby
                                                        MMM... so the US in it's wisdom, decided to go to war and find all these WMD... I understand now - thank you



                                                        And can you explain what made Saddam "an enemy of the US"?? I never knew he invaded the US or threatened to send any of these "claimed" loads of missles to the US. Your opinion is always appreciated
                                                        I would suggest that the ass kicking the US gave him in '91 made him an enemy of the US. On several occasions Saddam called for Americans to be killed where ever they were found. And what "claimed" loads of missiles are you talking about?
                                                        When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                        FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                        Comment

                                                        • Webby
                                                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                          • Oct 2002
                                                          • 14956

                                                          #228
                                                          theking:

                                                          Number one Iraq was a keeper of documents...they had zero documents about the destruction of the remaining WMD's/materials left from '98...they made the ridiculous claim that the documents had also been destroyed. There would have been a location/locations for the destruction and there would have been physical proof of the destruction...they did not provide a single location or any physical evidence for any destruction of any WMD's or WMD materials. There would have been scientists and other personell involved in the destruction and they did not provide a single person that was involved in the destruction...but yet maintained their claim that they had destroyed them.
                                                          Mmmm... more opinions... OK

                                                          The fact is, so far, THERE ARE NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION found. BUT, there was a WEALTH of "current evidence" coming from the US. Listen hard... you can not dispose of ALL traces of this material in years, nevermind a couple of months.

                                                          Shit... nevermind.. waste of time! By the way... it is well-overdue for the US to account for its' continued development of WMD - so shut the fuck up!!
                                                          XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • Webby
                                                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                            • Oct 2002
                                                            • 14956

                                                            #229
                                                            theking:

                                                            I would suggest that the ass kicking the US gave him in '91 made him an enemy of the US
                                                            Ah.. that's the reason... so by *some* logic... the US invaded Iraq and gave him an "ass kicking" and that made Saddam "an enemy of the US"?

                                                            OK.... I can't see many wanting to be "friends" of the US somehow!!
                                                            XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                                                            Comment

                                                            • ADL Colin
                                                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                              • Feb 2001
                                                              • 11929

                                                              #230
                                                              Originally posted by Centurion


                                                              Spare me your insanity! A discource over subjects is not being Un-American! And when the fuck does it say a person has to say something good or PRO about a subject if there ISN'T anything good or pro about it?

                                                              You like the rest of the red neck right wing villify people who have the courage to stand up and say "I think that was wrong!"

                                                              We went to war to DEFEND the right to DO THIS! And you in your hypocrisy dare say "How can you say bad things about America?"

                                                              *YOU* are clueless!!
                                                              Way too many assumptions and misspellings for me to take you you seriously. Come back when you finish high school. Oh, hell. I'll humor myself.

                                                              I didn't say he COULDN'T discuss the subject. I didn't even say it was wrong to be anti-American. Those are your words and your assumptions.

                                                              It is a reasonable conclusion, though not with certainty, that people who ALWAYS take one side of an argument hold strong axiomatic views on that subject. Mr. Popups continual barrage of "what America is doing wrong" posts would indicate an anti-American bias.
                                                              Last edited by ADL Colin; 06-09-2003, 03:10 AM.


                                                              Adult Date Link - $50 PPS starting NOW! -- good and JUICY!

                                                              skype = "adultdatelink"

                                                              Comment

                                                              • theking
                                                                Nice Kitty
                                                                • Sep 2002
                                                                • 21053

                                                                #231
                                                                Originally posted by mule

                                                                LOL, how often have you said that you'll never respond to me again?
                                                                You don't have to answer, that was a rhetorical question.
                                                                Answer this one instead: Based on satellite surveilance and other intelligence, the Bush administration had "irrefutable proof" of the existance and locations of the alleged WMD's. Why are they missing now? If they were moved, why did this incredible intelligence-gathering machine fail to register it?
                                                                As anyone that has served for any amount of time in the military learns that intel is wrong more often than it is right. Deciphering intel is more of an art than a science. The different intel agencies presented their conclusions to the Administration and also the same intel goes to the members of the House Intelligence Committee as well as the members of the Senate Intelligence Committee. In addition the Military has its own intel and has access to intel from some of the other agencies. Apparently all of these multitudes of people were of the same opinion based upon the intel provided to them...including the Administration.

                                                                Do you think that WMD's would have ever been presented as the primary public reason for invading a country if they knew that no WMD's would be found. Utterly fucking ridiculous to believe that.

                                                                We are less than 90 days into this...if no WMD's are found in two or three years...it will be clear that there was another major intel failure...it wouldn't be the first time and certainly won't be the last time.
                                                                When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                                FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                                Comment

                                                                • ServerGenius
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • Feb 2002
                                                                  • 9377

                                                                  #232
                                                                  231 BITCH!

                                                                  DynaMite

                                                                  Edit: (I can't count)
                                                                  | http://www.sinnerscash.com/ | ICQ: 370820 | Skype: SinnersCash | AdultWhosWho |

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • ADL Colin
                                                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                    • Feb 2001
                                                                    • 11929

                                                                    #233
                                                                    Originally posted by the indigo


                                                                    The USA's overall history is not so good either. We should attack USA right now for all the mess they did.

                                                                    The US embargo in Iraq probably caused more deaths than anything else... including Saddam Hussein.
                                                                    If you do, you'll be a daisy.

                                                                    That was a UN embargo by the way. Do you think the UN is irrelevant?


                                                                    Adult Date Link - $50 PPS starting NOW! -- good and JUICY!

                                                                    skype = "adultdatelink"

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • mule
                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                      • Jan 2002
                                                                      • 6085

                                                                      #234
                                                                      Originally posted by theking


                                                                      As anyone that has served for any amount of time in the military learns that intel is wrong more often than it is right. Deciphering intel is more of an art than a science. The different intel agencies presented their conclusions to the Administration and also the same intel goes to the members of the House Intelligence Committee as well as the members of the Senate Intelligence Committee. In addition the Military has its own intel and has access to intel from some of the other agencies. Apparently all of these multitudes of people were of the same opinion based upon the intel provided to them...including the Administration.

                                                                      Do you think that WMD's would have ever been presented as the primary public reason for invading a country if they knew that no WMD's would be found. Utterly fucking ridiculous to believe that.

                                                                      We are less than 90 days into this...if no WMD's are found in two or three years...it will be clear that there was another major intel failure...it wouldn't be the first time and certainly won't be the last time.
                                                                      So they aren't liars, they're just incompetent?
                                                                      Converting like a mofo

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • ADL Colin
                                                                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                        • Feb 2001
                                                                        • 11929

                                                                        #235
                                                                        Originally posted by directfiesta


                                                                        Colin , get an enema...

                                                                        It will clear up your brain.
                                                                        Yes, I'm sure always seeing one side of a story, only presenting one side of a story, and that arguing that those who don't agree with what is nothing more than the common view where you are from just "don't get it" is a sign of clarity.

                                                                        I bet you think you thought of the nonsense you do all by yourself ;-)


                                                                        Adult Date Link - $50 PPS starting NOW! -- good and JUICY!

                                                                        skype = "adultdatelink"

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • theking
                                                                          Nice Kitty
                                                                          • Sep 2002
                                                                          • 21053

                                                                          #236
                                                                          Originally posted by Colin


                                                                          If you do, you'll be a daisy.

                                                                          That was a UN embargo by the way. Do you think the UN is irrelevant?
                                                                          This same BS...the US embargo...is spewed out over and over...I am pleased to see you join the fray Colin.
                                                                          When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                                          FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • ADL Colin
                                                                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                            • Feb 2001
                                                                            • 11929

                                                                            #237
                                                                            Originally posted by Centurion


                                                                            we helped put in power and KEPT him there with weapons from the UNITED STATES!
                                                                            That's not history. I don't know what it is. Migs, T series tanks, and AK-47s are Russian made weapons. Why are there no Abrams tanks, F15s, or M16s in Iraq? Amazing, huh?


                                                                            Adult Date Link - $50 PPS starting NOW! -- good and JUICY!

                                                                            skype = "adultdatelink"

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • theking
                                                                              Nice Kitty
                                                                              • Sep 2002
                                                                              • 21053

                                                                              #238
                                                                              Originally posted by mule

                                                                              So they aren't liars, they're just incompetent?
                                                                              If you are speaking about the intel agencies as being "they"...it could prove to be the case...only time will tell...if in a couple of years no WMD's have been found...that will be the case...but I will repeat that intel is wrong more often than it is right.
                                                                              When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                                              FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • XYCash
                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                • Jun 2003
                                                                                • 582

                                                                                #239
                                                                                Originally posted by theking

                                                                                We are less than 90 days into this...if no WMD's are found in two or three years...it will be clear that there was another major intel failure...it wouldn't be the first time and certainly won't be the last time.
                                                                                That's pretty much what the UN weapons inspectors were saying back before the war started and the Bush Administration ripped them to shreads for it. All they wanted was more time..no? Why should this administration expect what they themselves were not willing to give?

                                                                                -joe
                                                                                XYCash Gay Affiliate Programs - Making Money For Webmasters Since 1999 - click here to sign up

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • mule
                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                  • Jan 2002
                                                                                  • 6085

                                                                                  #240
                                                                                  Originally posted by theking


                                                                                  If you are speaking about the intel agencies as being "they"...it could prove to be the case...only time will tell...if in a couple of years no WMD's have been found...that will be the case...but I will repeat that intel is wrong more often than it is right.
                                                                                  Not very bright to base a war on it then, is it?
                                                                                  But rest assured that wmd's will be "found"
                                                                                  The Bush administration can't afford not to find them.
                                                                                  Converting like a mofo

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • Kimmykim
                                                                                    bitchslapping zebras!!!!!
                                                                                    • Jun 2001
                                                                                    • 16015

                                                                                    #241
                                                                                    Originally posted by Centurion


                                                                                    Oh fuck off and die!

                                                                                    I'm sick of people being called "Un-American" because they DARE criticize and part of the war!

                                                                                    The people that embrace the constitution and the 1st admendment are far MORE patriotic than those that just sit back and say NOTHING!

                                                                                    It is the DUTY of an American citizen to keep a watchful eye on it's government and to levy direct critical information when and if it is called for.


                                                                                    And this IS called for!
                                                                                    Well said.

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • theking
                                                                                      Nice Kitty
                                                                                      • Sep 2002
                                                                                      • 21053

                                                                                      #242
                                                                                      Originally posted by mule

                                                                                      Not very bright to base a war on it then, is it?
                                                                                      But rest assured that wmd's will be "found"
                                                                                      The Bush administration can't afford not to find them.
                                                                                      WMD's was the reason presented to the world...but I have always been of the opinion that it was a reason, but not the most important reason of several reasons. There were not any good choices to make when dealing with Iraq and ousting Saddam was the best of a list of bad choices.
                                                                                      When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                                                      FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • kenny
                                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                                        • Mar 2002
                                                                                        • 7245

                                                                                        #243
                                                                                        Removing Sadam was just a brick in the wall. The entire middle east is going to be changed. WMD or not, that is what the majority of the american people want. That is why Bush has such a high approval rating. If it isn't broke don't fix it. So instead of pointing the finger at Bush you should point it at the majority of the american public.
                                                                                        7

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • theking
                                                                                          Nice Kitty
                                                                                          • Sep 2002
                                                                                          • 21053

                                                                                          #244
                                                                                          Originally posted by kenny
                                                                                          Removing Sadam was just a brick in the wall. The entire middle east is going to be changed. WMD or not, that is what the majority of the american people want. That is why Bush has such a high approval rating. If it isn't broke don't fix it. So instead of pointing the finger at Bush you should point it at the majority of the american public.
                                                                                          "They" claim to hate President Bush and yet some of them claim not to hate the American people when the American people clearly support the President. Oh I know...I know...the Admininistration who has "control" of the American media have "brain washed" the poor stupid American people.
                                                                                          When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                                                          FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • Centurion
                                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                                            • Dec 2002
                                                                                            • 6033

                                                                                            #245
                                                                                            To the King:

                                                                                            I see you FINALLY wore down and answered the first question.
                                                                                            GOOD FOR YOU! But let's state your postings and answers step by step:

                                                                                            "Iraq never possessed WMD's that were a threat to the US through military deployment...only a threat via terrorist tactics."

                                                                                            Hey numb nuts! I don't think the United States was afraid of Iraq conventionally attacking the United States with it's ground forces or scud missles.

                                                                                            It WAS the THREAT of the use of WMD's VIA terrorists, Iraqi or otherwise that lead Bush to say "We must dismantle Saddam's weapons of mass destruction to protect the United States & other countries from attack."

                                                                                            So you agree that Bush LIED!

                                                                                            You agree that Colin Powell lied to the United Nations when he said the United States "possess irrefutable evidence that Iraq posses chemical and biological weapons" to support the United States invasion of Iraq!

                                                                                            You agree then that Bush's campaign to DISARM Iraq's WMDs was simply a cover to get even for the assassination attempt on his Daddy and the grudge left over from the last Gulf War.

                                                                                            You must also agree there was no clear and present danger that Al Quaida would get these WMD's to use against the U.S. because they did not exist, even though that was ANOTHER line Bush has pushed (and still does!)

                                                                                            The only conclusion then is that there is a great chance the American people, had they known ALL of these facts BEFORE we went to war probably would NOT have supported the attack on Iraq!

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • Mr.Fiction
                                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                                              • Feb 2002
                                                                                              • 9484

                                                                                              #246
                                                                                              Bush's published approval ratings in most current polls is closer to 60% than 70% and dropping.

                                                                                              He's only that high because people are afraid to say they don't like a president during a "war".
                                                                                              Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • The Porn Dude
                                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                                • Feb 2003
                                                                                                • 369

                                                                                                #247
                                                                                                Originally posted by Mr.Fiction


                                                                                                Now the truth is anti-American?

                                                                                                What if it is proved that Bush lied so that he could start a war for his own political reasons?

                                                                                                Will you care?

                                                                                                Would Bush have to get a blowjob to make you care about his lying?

                                                                                                Was it anti-American to support the impeachment of Richard Nixon?
                                                                                                SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • Centurion
                                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                                  • Dec 2002
                                                                                                  • 6033

                                                                                                  #248
                                                                                                  Dear King,

                                                                                                  Now for this post:

                                                                                                  "The remaining WMD's/materials that Iraq admitted to having and claimed they destroyed after the inspectors left in '98. Of course they offered zero proof that they destroyed them as they claimed."

                                                                                                  5 days ago the D.I.A. (Defense Intelligence Agency) wrote that the administration NEVER had any concrete proof that Iraq had ANY WMDs when the U.S. attacked.

                                                                                                  Even Wolfowitz said that the defense & state departments couldn't agree on WHICH line of attack (WMDs, Terrorism Links etc) to finally GIVE to the American people because they really couldn't prove those. He then said: "We decided on the 'Liberation of the Iraqi people' for beaurcratic reasons."

                                                                                                  If THAT is why we went to war in Iraq, we should be Ashamed and disgustedly angry!

                                                                                                  As several have pointed out earlier in this thread, "military action is reserved for situations indicating there is a clear and present danger to the security of the country."

                                                                                                  George W. Bush could NOT prove that existed, so he made up SEVERAL lies to justify the war. Do you have ANY idea what a VERY dangerous precedent this sets for any and all future actions ANY President can take then? Hell, if we don't like their politics, lets remove them from power and put someone in *WE* like! (Which IS what is going to happen in Iraq!)

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • Centurion
                                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                                    • Dec 2002
                                                                                                    • 6033

                                                                                                    #249
                                                                                                    Originally posted by Colin


                                                                                                    Way too many assumptions and misspellings for me to take you you seriously. Come back when you finish high school. Oh, hell. I'll humor myself.

                                                                                                    "Come back when you finish high school"
                                                                                                    Damn good line to use when you have absolutely NOTHING constructive to say on the subject. Man..put me in my place!
                                                                                                    -------------------------------

                                                                                                    "It is a reasonable conclusion, though not with certainty, that people who ALWAYS take one side of an argument hold strong axiomatic views on that subject. Mr. Popups continual barrage of "what America is doing wrong" posts would indicate an anti-American bias."

                                                                                                    Oh gee, that is very wrong of any person to hold strong views they believe in eh? Obviously if a person posts about something they strongly believe in, it automatically makes them "Un-American". What if they are saying what the UNITED STATES did was "UN-AMERICAN!"? That our actions, taking a FIRST STRIKE against a nation that had NOT attacked the United States WAS VERY un-American?

                                                                                                    I will never buy the right wing's stand on the Iraqi war which is simply this:


                                                                                                    "MY COUNTRY..RIGHT OR WRONG!"

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    • Centurion
                                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                                      • Dec 2002
                                                                                                      • 6033

                                                                                                      #250
                                                                                                      To the King:

                                                                                                      Your post:"We are less than 90 days into this...if no WMD's are found in two or three years...it will be clear that there was another major intel failure...it wouldn't be the first time and certainly won't be the last time."


                                                                                                      You are saying that we need to wait for 2-3 years to pass before we can THEN say, "Ok..there are no WMDs".

                                                                                                      How convenient that would be..to decide then, way AFTER the 2004 election.

                                                                                                      To wait 2-3 years is totally inane! Iraq has a lot of sand, but not THAT much!

                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                      Working...