MasterCard Statement about Paycom's Lawsuit

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chris Mallick
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2002
    • 679

    #1

    MasterCard Statement about Paycom's Lawsuit

    From Cardline News?.
    PAYCOM SUES MASTERCARD OVER CHARGEBACK FINES: Paycom Billing Services Inc., a Marina Del Rey, CA-based company that primarily processes card transactions for adult Web sites, has filed an antitrust lawsuit against MasterCard International in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Los Angeles. Paycom is alleging that MasterCard has established monopolistic rules that allow it unreasonable discretion to dominate Internet merchants, Dennis M.P. Ehling, Paycom's attorney, tells CardLine today. Ehling says MasterCard either has collected or has attempted to collect more than $2.5 million in fines from Paycom for excessive chargebacks that have occurred since June 2001. MasterCard imposes the fines when chargebacks exceed a 1% of ongoing sales threshold. Ehling says that some months Paycom's chargebacks were below the threshold, and some months they were above it. About 40% of the cards Paycom processes are MasterCards. MasterCard called the allegations "baseless."
    "It is nothing more than a brazen attempt to avoid complying with MasterCard rules that are designed to protect consumers, merchants and MasterCard's member financial institutions," MasterCard said in a statement.


    End News Story



    Start Paycom / EPOCH Response

    Someone at MasterCard must have gotten up to the ?B??s today in the dictionary. ?Baseless? and ?Brazen?. Good words, not applicable here. Their statement is a testament to their arrogance.

    A further note: Regardless of the author?s writing, Paycom (and our attorney knows this and the lawsuits states) has not been over 1% for since last May (12 months).

    Chris Mallick
    [email protected]
  • Chris Mallick
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2002
    • 679

    #2
    OK, now I am seriously worried. MasterCard is making public statements without checking Webster?s. Shameless.


    bra·zen ( P ) Pronunciation Key (brzn)
    adj.
    Marked by flagrant and insolent audacity.

    base·less ( P ) Pronunciation Key (bsls)
    adj.
    Having no basis or foundation in fact; unfounded.

    Chris Mallick
    [email protected]

    Comment

    • ronin
      Confirmed User
      • Aug 2002
      • 1300

      #3
      MasterCard called the allegations "baseless."


      End of Story


      LOL

      Comment

      • FlyingIguana
        aspiring banker
        • Mar 2002
        • 10870

        #4
        what about protecting the sites using mastercard against fraud? they don't seem to care about that because they simply charge them money for every chargeback.

        Comment

        • detacided
          Registered User
          • Oct 2002
          • 83

          #5
          It seems like 1/10 posts is something concerning CC processing going to hell
          This is my sig. Flashy, huh?

          Comment

          • OY
            Industry Pioneer
            • Oct 2002
            • 5401

            #6
            Good stuff!

            Want me to hand them a rope?
            Around since 1997, and the company that introduced "Cascading Billing" in MPA3® Affiliate Management and Tracking Software

            Outsourcing With A Norwegian Twist - NordBits - Inquire within!

            Comment

            • andi_germany
              Confirmed User
              • Oct 2002
              • 768

              #7
              Like always lawyers talk consists of words that normal people have to lookup to make the statement look important.

              I bet you 1% of the outcome that it will be a nice settlement
              SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

              Comment

              • SykkBoy2
                Jesus loves bacon
                • Feb 2001
                • 19969

                #8
                Originally posted by FlyingIguana
                what about protecting the sites using mastercard against fraud? they don't seem to care about that because they simply charge them money for every chargeback.
                exactly!

                this is what pisses me off most...
                I understand protecting customers and have no problems with that, but I think they need to run that protection both ways. It'll probably never happen, but we can all dream.....
                Support my new movie “The Second Coming”

                Comment

                • FlyingIguana
                  aspiring banker
                  • Mar 2002
                  • 10870

                  #9
                  Originally posted by SykkBoy2


                  exactly!

                  this is what pisses me off most...
                  I understand protecting customers and have no problems with that, but I think they need to run that protection both ways. It'll probably never happen, but we can all dream.....
                  i think this lawsuit will change things. mastercard and visa pretty much have a monopoly and they can charge whatever they want. i don't see how mastercard could win.

                  Comment

                  • tony299
                    lurker
                    • Aug 2002
                    • 57021

                    #10
                    Originally posted by SykkBoy2


                    exactly!

                    this is what pisses me off most...
                    I understand protecting customers and have no problems with that, but I think they need to run that protection both ways. It'll probably never happen, but we can all dream.....

                    They will never protect the merchant because they can charge the merchant up the ass and merchant can do nothing but smile .

                    Comment

                    • FlyingIguana
                      aspiring banker
                      • Mar 2002
                      • 10870

                      #11
                      Originally posted by tony404



                      They will never protect the merchant because they can charge the merchant up the ass and merchant can do nothing but smile .
                      they already lost once so far this year. or settled out of court, but they were going to lose anyways.

                      Comment

                      • flub_stub
                        Registered User
                        • May 2003
                        • 15

                        #12
                        Who knows maybe some of the large main stream High Risk companies will get in on this. Sure would look good, at least on paper or in the paper.

                        Comment

                        • goBigtime
                          Confirmed User
                          • Nov 2002
                          • 7761

                          #13
                          I dunno how 'baseless' it is when you penalize your clients (the merchants) for issuing refunds or credits to their customers when they aren't happy with the product or service they purchased.

                          Comment

                          • Chris Mallick
                            Confirmed User
                            • Jan 2002
                            • 679

                            #14
                            Interesting... This is MasterCard's statement on the Wal-Mart lawsuit... 6 months before they paid Wal-Mart $1 BILLION.

                            I feel good

                            December 13th, 2002

                            Noah Hanft, MasterCard general counsel, said: "The retailers' groundless claims are based on the notion that MasterCard has somehow stunted the development of online debit utilizing a PIN number in the U.S. The absurdity of that argument is self-evident when one simply considers the undisputed fact that PIN debit - including STAR, NYCE, PULSE and other PIN debit networks - has grown enormously over the last decade:

                            No MasterCard rule stops Wal-Mart from suggesting - as it routinely does - that customers pay with PIN debit. Given these undisputed facts, Wal-Mart and other retailers have no basis to claim that MasterCard has somehow impaired their ability to accept or promote their preferred forms of payment. But in the end, it is the American consumer that should ultimately decide how to pay, not Wal-Mart or any other retailer. For this reason as well, this case is simply without merit and should be dismissed now."
                            American antitrust laws, which are designed to protect consumers, encourage practices like MasterCard's Honor All Cards rule, which creates a greater range of choice for consumers and protects their freedom of choice. For these reasons, this groundless lawsuit should be dismissed."

                            Chris Mallick
                            [email protected]

                            Comment

                            • ronin
                              Confirmed User
                              • Aug 2002
                              • 1300

                              #15
                              only 1 billion.. shit

                              Comment

                              • grampatex
                                Registered User
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 21

                                #16
                                Good luck to you Paycom. You have balls. Hope you don't end up like Website Billing. Didn't they take on Visa. Doesn't seem like things have worked out for them.
                                grampatex

                                Comment

                                • Giorgio_Xo
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Mar 2003
                                  • 4263

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Chris Mallick
                                  From Cardline News?.
                                  PAYCOM SUES MASTERCARD OVER CHARGEBACK FINES: Paycom Billing Services Inc., a Marina Del Rey, CA-based company that primarily processes card transactions for adult Web sites, has filed an antitrust lawsuit against MasterCard International in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Los Angeles. Paycom is alleging that MasterCard has established monopolistic rules that allow it unreasonable discretion to dominate Internet merchants, Dennis M.P. Ehling, Paycom's attorney, tells CardLine today. Ehling says MasterCard either has collected or has attempted to collect more than $2.5 million in fines from Paycom for excessive chargebacks that have occurred since June 2001. MasterCard imposes the fines when chargebacks exceed a 1% of ongoing sales threshold. Ehling says that some months Paycom's chargebacks were below the threshold, and some months they were above it. About 40% of the cards Paycom processes are MasterCards. MasterCard called the allegations "baseless."
                                  "It is nothing more than a brazen attempt to avoid complying with MasterCard rules that are designed to protect consumers, merchants and MasterCard's member financial institutions," MasterCard said in a statement.


                                  End News Story



                                  Start Paycom / EPOCH Response

                                  Someone at MasterCard must have gotten up to the ?B??s today in the dictionary. ?Baseless? and ?Brazen?. Good words, not applicable here. Their statement is a testament to their arrogance.

                                  A further note: Regardless of the author?s writing, Paycom (and our attorney knows this and the lawsuits states) has not been over 1% for since last May (12 months).
                                  How much for Paycom? I want an excuse to move to Marina del Ray. I'll pay in Dollars.
                                  Make Levees, Not War

                                  Comment

                                  • Lensman
                                    GFY Chaperone
                                    • Jan 2001
                                    • 9846

                                    #18
                                    Deja Vu. Both lawsuits are very similiar.

                                    Chris is fighting for all of us and the fact that MC even responded pubically shows that they are very concerned about it. If it truly was baseless, they wouldn't even start their PR campaign.

                                    Comment

                                    • Giorgio_Xo
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Mar 2003
                                      • 4263

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Lensman
                                      Deja Vu. Both lawsuits are very similiar.

                                      Chris is fighting for all of us and the fact that MC even responded pubically shows that they are very concerned about it. If it truly was baseless, they wouldn't even start their PR campaign.
                                      I would agree! I hate seeing the adult industry trampled by the Man simply because we sell naked lady pictures.
                                      Make Levees, Not War

                                      Comment

                                      • hershie
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Jun 2002
                                        • 4642

                                        #20
                                        another article on the story:

                                        MasterCard sued over Net billing methods
                                        By Dawn Kawamoto
                                        Staff Writer, CNET News.com
                                        May 13, 2003, 4:51 PM PT
                                        http://news.com.com/2100-1019-1001393.html

                                        Internet payment firm Paycom Billing Services has filed a lawsuit against MasterCard, alleging the credit card issuer committed fraud when processing merchants' online transactions.
                                        Paycom, which filed its suit in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles on Monday, said MasterCard used its "monopolistic...power to illegally impose fines and penalties in the millions of dollars" when processing merchants' online sales. Paycom is seeking more than $23 million in damages.

                                        Paycom's lawsuit comes on the heels of a $1 billion settlement MasterCard reached earlier this month with Wal-Mart and Sears, Roebuck over allegations the credit card giant added excessive fees to debit card transactions.

                                        "We understand we're not a brick-and-mortar merchant, and we understand online payments are a different type of transaction than one in person," said Chris Mallick, Paycom's chief executive. "But what we don't understand is the charge backs to Paycom."

                                        In the lawsuit, Paycom said MasterCard charges Internet merchants transaction fees much higher than those charged to traditional retailers, where customers pay with cash or checks.

                                        "MasterCard attempts to justify this difference by arguing that Internet merchants like Paycom are more prone to fraud, but as the District Court established in USA vs. Visa, this explanation is belied by the fact that Paycom and other Internet merchants...bear virtually all risk of loss from fraudulent transactions," the suit stated.

                                        MasterCard said that the suit is without merit and the company's rules are meant to "protect merchants by requiring that the (customer) promptly pay its merchant for all MasterCard transactions and by affording certain protections against bogus cardholder complaints."

                                        Meanwhile, Paycom has received inquiries from more than 24 online merchants and attorneys about filing their own lawsuits or joining Paycom for a class-action suit.

                                        Comment

                                        • Kimmykim
                                          bitchslapping zebras!!!!!
                                          • Jun 2001
                                          • 16015

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by grampatex
                                          Good luck to you Paycom. You have balls. Hope you don't end up like Website Billing. Didn't they take on Visa. Doesn't seem like things have worked out for them.
                                          I dont think that WSB's issues have arisen over the fact that they filed suit against Visa -- I seem to recall that being settled and things going back to normal. I would guess their problems stem more from not screening their larger clients more carefully before allowing them to do a few things that were probably bad business ideas.

                                          Comment

                                          • goBigtime
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Nov 2002
                                            • 7761

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by Chris Mallick
                                            Interesting... This is MasterCard's statement on the Wal-Mart lawsuit... 6 months before they paid Wal-Mart $1 BILLION.

                                            I feel good
                                            Remember us little guys when you get that cool billlion.

                                            Comment

                                            • PornoDoggy
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Jun 2002
                                              • 1053

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by andi_germany
                                              Like always lawyers talk consists of words that normal people have to lookup to make the statement look important.

                                              I bet you 1% of the outcome that it will be a nice settlement
                                              Will that come out of the 40% that the lawyer gets?

                                              Comment

                                              • goBigtime
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Nov 2002
                                                • 7761

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by Lensman
                                                Deja Vu. Both lawsuits are very similiar.

                                                Chris is fighting for all of us and the fact that MC even responded pubically shows that they are very concerned about it. If it truly was baseless, they wouldn't even start their PR campaign.

                                                Meanwhile somewhere in GFYam city....

                                                Hmmmm I wonder if they are here... lurking....

                                                Quick! Lensman!... to the logmobile!

                                                Comment

                                                • Swoit
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Apr 2003
                                                  • 256

                                                  #25
                                                  Meanwhile, Paycom has received inquiries from more than 24 online merchants and attorneys about filing their own lawsuits or joining Paycom for a class-action suit.
                                                  Hi Chris

                                                  Can you tell us any more about this - I have a very close relationship with several billing companies, and they all believe it is definately in the industrys best interest.

                                                  Have any other billing companies approached you about a class action ?

                                                  Steve
                                                  SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • Ludedude
                                                    Suck it!
                                                    • Jun 2001
                                                    • 4432

                                                    #26
                                                    Good job guys.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • ronin
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Aug 2002
                                                      • 1300

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by goBigtime



                                                      Meanwhile somewhere in GFYam city....

                                                      Hmmmm I wonder if they are here... lurking....

                                                      Quick! Lensman!... to the logmobile!

                                                      haha LOL

                                                      Comment

                                                      • tony299
                                                        lurker
                                                        • Aug 2002
                                                        • 57021

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by goBigtime


                                                        Remember us little guys when you get that cool billlion.

                                                        Chris gets a billion dollars he will be having his retirement party at Internext lol.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • Chris Mallick
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Jan 2002
                                                          • 679

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by Swoit


                                                          Hi Chris

                                                          Can you tell us any more about this - I have a very close relationship with several billing companies, and they all believe it is definately in the industrys best interest.

                                                          Have any other billing companies approached you about a class action ?

                                                          Steve
                                                          You can email me at [email protected] and I will put you in contact with our lawyers.

                                                          Chris Mallick
                                                          [email protected]

                                                          Comment

                                                          • Chris Mallick
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Jan 2002
                                                            • 679

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by Lensman
                                                            Deja Vu. Both lawsuits are very similiar.

                                                            Chris is fighting for all of us and the fact that MC even responded pubically shows that they are very concerned about it. If it truly was baseless, they wouldn't even start their PR campaign.
                                                            Thanks Lens.....
                                                            See you in LALA Land in a couple for the D$ Show Live.

                                                            C

                                                            Chris Mallick
                                                            [email protected]

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Cassie
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • Mar 2003
                                                              • 3139

                                                              #31
                                                              i am truly impressed! we talked, internally here, a while ago about trying to get webmasters together for a class action suit again visa, mc and amex at the time (discover is the only company who we never had problems with) and much to our surprise, quite a few webmasters weren't interested in signing a petition to file a suit. it floored me how so many webmasters at the time, would just go with the flow of how these companies changed their rules and regulations on the fly without a care for the merchant who they were guaranteed to make money from every month, whether the customer actually paid or not.

                                                              kudos to you and give it to them where it hurts!
                                                              ICQ: 309756847
                                                              ]

                                                              Comment

                                                              • CigarMan
                                                                Registered User
                                                                • May 2003
                                                                • 81

                                                                #32
                                                                Another reason why I'm happy Epoch is my primary processor.

                                                                I've had merchant accounts and CC processing since 1990 in several different businesses. Visa/MC don't give a rats ass about the merchants or the consumers. They only care about collecting fees. Since they want the customers to keep using the cards so they can keep collecting interest it's in their best interest to screw over the merchants.
                                                                <a href="http://www.wepayu.com">We Pay U 70% Recurring</a>

                                                                Comment

                                                                • tucker
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • Dec 2002
                                                                  • 584

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Chris - you know this is typical big business B.S. When in doubt deny, deny, deny and then deny again and hope people start believing the BS. Good example ENRON - oh yeah nothing wrong here. AOL anti trust suit, oh yeah we never cooked the books, well maybe a little.

                                                                  You have them and we all support the fight for the truth. Kick em and then kick em again so they remember.

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • totalsexcams
                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                    • Sep 2007
                                                                    • 275

                                                                    #34
                                                                    . .
                                                                    Last edited by totalsexcams; 10-12-2010, 06:11 PM.

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    Working...