Originally posted by kmanrox
dad = fucking idiot
dad = fucking idiot
You got that right!
-
You got that right! -
Hey dumbass, I wasn't referring to the graph. In the first paragraph it saysOriginally posted by mule
With no respect whatsoever: you can't read a graph, or understand statistic. Go shoot yourself.
Accidental Deaths 866
If we want to talk about Homicides, then you should first tell me how many homicides were commited using a LEGALLY OBTAINED gun. Otherwise the figure means nothing.
I am far from an angry little girl. It is a shame you are not intelligent enough to come up with one valid argumentComment
-
Do you really think that people who commit suicide would sayOriginally posted by Battuss
Shit i have to comment on it:
Fact: Suicide 17,424 with the use of guns
Jenny's repsonse: The gun really didn't have much to do with it. They would have ended up dead on way or another.
This is easily the most idiotic thing i read all way.
"Oh shit, I don't have a gun. Guess I will have to continue living."
No, they will slit their wrists, hang themselves, O.D. on pills, etc....Comment
-
OK, you're a silly little girlOriginally posted by jennym
Hey dumbass, I wasn't referring to the graph. In the first paragraph it says
Accidental Deaths 866
If we want to talk about Homicides, then you should first tell me how many homicides were commited using a LEGALLY OBTAINED gun. Otherwise the figure means nothing.
I am far from an angry little girl. It is a shame you are not intelligent enough to come up with one valid argumentConverting like a mofoComment
-
This is really my last reply to you.Originally posted by jennym
Hey dumbass, I wasn't referring to the graph. In the first paragraph it says
Accidental Deaths 866
If we want to talk about Homicides, then you should first tell me how many homicides were commited using a LEGALLY OBTAINED gun. Otherwise the figure means nothing.
I am far from an angry little girl. It is a shame you are not intelligent enough to come up with one valid argument
I am NOT gonna argue with people who compare having stairs in a house with having a gun in a house. Something you dont understand about that? Thanks.
Now go find a thread about music or the latest mj news, it will be less complicated for you.Comment
-
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by kmanrox
didn't your country get overthrown by the Nazi's?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Battuss
Im not sure what you mean but i'll simply ignore this for now because it can only be something very stupid.
I think he's talking about when we (Gun toting USA citizens) came in and kicked the shit out of Germany after they invaded your Country in 1940 and killed a bunch of your people and raped your women.Comment
-
Ah i figured something like that...thanks.Originally posted by BV
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by kmanrox
didn't your country get overthrown by the Nazi's?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think he's talking about when we (Gun toting USA citizens) came in and kicked the shit out of Germany after they invaded your Country in 1940 and killed a bunch of your people and raped your women.Comment
-
Nothing like stating the obvious. Other things that produce tons of deaths.Originally posted by Battuss
Its just that a country where guns are legal produces tons of deaths by guns and a country where its illegal doesnt.
Automobiles...Motorcycles...Airplanes...Trains...B icycles...Industries...Agriculture...Mining...Fire s...etc. etc.When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
Originally posted by Battuss
This is really my last reply to you.
I am NOT gonna argue with people who compare having stairs in a house with having a gun in a house. Something you dont understand about that? Thanks.
Now go find a thread about music or the latest mj news, it will be less complicated for you.
I understand your reluctance to attempt an intelligent debate.
Anyway, have a nice day!
Comment
-
Once again people. If you like to shoot then by all means do so but not 1 dead by guns can be justified. Not 1.
Accident, suicide, homocide, i dont care, it happened because there was a gun available. Period.Comment
-
SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY!!! IT WAS A TRAGIC ACCIDENT. Everyday 10 people in the State of Calfornia ALONE DIES as a result of AUTOMOBILE accidents!!Comment
-
Battus, let's go have a beer, even theking has joined in now, I think this thread is attracting all the morons somehow
Converting like a mofoComment
-
First off, I will not be doing any name calling. It is my opinion that name calling only makes the caller look bad and tends to make his arguments seem less.
Part of what jenny said is correct, and part is not. The majority of the gun-related deaths in the United States are due to suicide. However, I don't believe they would have died anyway were they unable to get to a gun. They would have had to think it through a bit more in requirement to find a different method, which may well have saved some of their lives, though hardly all.
What Carrie said is correct. In the cities and towns throughout the US where it is required for each family to own a gun of some sort, the crime rate has dropped significantly. I don't know about you, but if I were a criminal, I sure as hell am going to avoid a town where I know everyone is armed. You break into someone's home there and chances are, you're going to get shot.
In many states of the United States, cars kill more people annually than guns. Sorry, that's a fact, and whether or not you think it's stupid bullshit is up to you. Personally, I don't give a fuck.
We were granted the right to keep and bear arms because we didn't appreciate being repressed. We also have the right to a well-organized militia and we have the right to overthrow the government in favor of something better. (No, we haven't done that yet. I have to admit, I'm kinda dreading it and kinda looking forward to it. Strange feeling, really.)
Thought to turn over for a bit: Had weapons been in the homes of the people of Nazi-occupied Europe, would the Nazis really have been able to take over?
Had weapons not been available to the people of the United States, would we still be a British territory?
Please respond ONLY on the post, and NOT as to whether or not you think I'm stupid. I really don't give two shits.
And don't ask me what I think of you, I might not give the answer that you want me to.
ICQ: 11120676 | Google: mindcrime | Skype: suitemindcrime|E-Mail: mindcrime AT gmail.com|PR girl with great writing skills for hire!!!! Contact me to work for YOU!|TECHIEMEDIA? 24/7 support from some of the best techs in the biz. Tell Jim that I sent you.Comment
-
Altho youre not my favourite gfy'er you are not stupid. Please dont place yourself next to jenny in the stupidness charts.Originally posted by theking
Nothing like stating the obvious. Other things that produce tons of deaths.
Automobiles...Motorcycles...Airplanes...Trains...B icycles...Industries...Agriculture...Mining...Fire s...etc. etc.
Everybody knows guns are not needed (except in war) but cars, trains, agriculture etc is our world, its our work, its something we need. We couldnt live witouth it out. Guns dont belong in that group. And i know you know that but for some reason prefer to act stupid.Comment
-
Blame it on guns if you want to, but keep in mind an idiot can kill with a bottle of bleach.
I'm amused at all the people coming out blaming guns. 42,000 people die in car crashes every year. Should we outlaw cars?
The guy shot into the brush? No gun would be that stupid, only a dumb mother fucking human being, of which there are millions.
And yes, guns have as much a right to exist as any tool.it only took one brick to make that window dropComment
-
The Top Ten Causes Of Accidental Death In America
10. Machinery
Deaths per year: 350
9. Medical & Surgical Complications and Misadventures
Deaths per year: 500
8. Poisoning by gases
Deaths per year: 700
7. Firearms
Deaths per year: 1,500
6. Suffocation
Deaths per year: 3,300
5. Fires and burns
Deaths per year: 3,700
4. Drowning
Deaths per year: 4,000
3. Poisoning by solids and liquids
Deaths per year: 8,600
2. Falls
Deaths per year: 14,900
including falls from ladders, down stairs, over curbs, off buses, into manholes, and through plate glass windows.
1. Motor vehicle crashes
Deaths per year: 43,200
Looks like my kid is safer in a home with guns than one with stairs, ladders and windows.
Comment
-
Like I said...
People are going to murder each other or kill each other accidentally for as long as the human race exists. Guns are only one method by which this truth comes to fruition.
Some people die from vehicular incidents.
Some die from falling out of windows.
Some die from consuming toxins.
Some die from trying stupid stunts like the girl on the merry-go-round I posted about earlier.
If all guns disappeared tomorrow and could no new guns could ever be created, people would still die from accidents and murders.
I could kill you with my bare hands if I wanted to.Comment
-
Better outlaw knives, swords, bows and arrows, sledgehammers, axes, and ice picks too.Originally posted by Battuss
Altho youre not my favourite gfy'er you are not stupid. Please dont place yourself next to jenny in the stupidness charts.
Everybody knows guns are not needed (except in war) but cars, trains, agriculture etc is our world, its our work, its something we need. We couldnt live witouth it out. Guns dont belong in that group. And i know you know that but for some reason prefer to act stupid.Comment
-
Tala i see where you coming from and you are pointing out a problem. The problem is guns were legal in your country in the first place. Making them illegal might have a strange effect and mabye even a wrong effect. (It would still lower the amount of deads by guns tho) If your country wouldnt have allowed guns in the first place you would have a couple of 100.000 accidents a year less. Do you know what i mean?Originally posted by Tala
First off, I will not be doing any name calling. It is my opinion that name calling only makes the caller look bad and tends to make his arguments seem less.
Part of what jenny said is correct, and part is not. The majority of the gun-related deaths in the United States are due to suicide. However, I don't believe they would have died anyway were they unable to get to a gun. They would have had to think it through a bit more in requirement to find a different method, which may well have saved some of their lives, though hardly all.
What Carrie said is correct. In the cities and towns throughout the US where it is required for each family to own a gun of some sort, the crime rate has dropped significantly. I don't know about you, but if I were a criminal, I sure as hell am going to avoid a town where I know everyone is armed. You break into someone's home there and chances are, you're going to get shot.
In many states of the United States, cars kill more people annually than guns. Sorry, that's a fact, and whether or not you think it's stupid bullshit is up to you. Personally, I don't give a fuck.
We were granted the right to keep and bear arms because we didn't appreciate being repressed. We also have the right to a well-organized militia and we have the right to overthrow the government in favor of something better. (No, we haven't done that yet. I have to admit, I'm kinda dreading it and kinda looking forward to it. Strange feeling, really.)
Thought to turn over for a bit: Had weapons been in the homes of the people of Nazi-occupied Europe, would the Nazis really have been able to take over?
Had weapons not been available to the people of the United States, would we still be a British territory?
Please respond ONLY on the post, and NOT as to whether or not you think I'm stupid. I really don't give two shits.
And don't ask me what I think of you, I might not give the answer that you want me to.Comment
-
We'd still be under the rule of the British who were supressing us with guns.Originally posted by Battuss
Tala i see where you coming from and you are pointing out a problem. The problem is guns were legal in your country in the first place. Making them illegal might have a strange effect and mabye even a wrong effect. (It would still lower the amount of deads by guns tho) If your country wouldnt have allowed guns in the first place you would have a couple of 100.000 accidents a year less. Do you know what i mean?Comment
-
BTW, I don't agree with your theory: Even if no one had guns (even criminals) then it would be too easy for thugs to pick on the elderly and women.Originally posted by Battuss
Ah i figured something like that...thanks.
What if a couple of thugs broke into your grandmothers house, or your own house while you were away, wouldn't you want your wife or paramour to be able to protect themself and to have something to EQUALIZE the situation?Comment
-
YES i know people can die because of cars and trains and knives etc. Goddamn, you people are freaking me out.
This is not a reason to allow guns!!!!
I just fucking saying guns makes killing and accidents and suicides way easier.
Our system relies on cars and fucking windows in your house. And we need knived to slice our bread....please dont be so stupid to compare this with guns.Comment
-
The difference is that pulling a trigger is easy. It's much easier to shoot someone than to knock their brains out with a bat, or strangle them, or stab them. Not only physically easier, but (especially) psychologically.Originally posted by Buff
If all guns disappeared tomorrow and could no new guns could ever be created, people would still die from accidents and murders.
I could kill you with my bare hands if I wanted to.Converting like a mofoComment
-
Tala - I will concede the point you made on suicides. I certainly do believe that some of those people may not have killed themselves without an "immediate" way to do so.
Battus
It seems to me that many people "lived" without cars, and trains for many, many years.Everybody knows guns are not needed (except in war) but cars, trains, agriculture etc is our world, its our work, its something we need. We couldnt live witouth it out.
My point on guns is that most people who use guns CRIMINALLY do not obtain them LEGALLY, so making them illegal really doesn't impact the criminals.Comment
-
you're right.Originally posted by Battuss
Dude, ofcourse not every criminal will use hunting rifles for the reasons you mentioned, i know that. Im just saying some criminals will and death will keep on happening. Way less but it wont stop by simply banning handguns. Plus every now and then an idiot like the sniper last year will smoke too much crack and shoot some people.
We can argue forever and you can call me what you want but as long as guns are available, no matter what kind of guns, people will get shot. Period.
Now i cant wait for the next idiot who will say "cars kill as well" will show up. Please thing before you post.
I'll reword.
you're a COMPLETE AND TOTAL FUCKING IDIOTThis dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Now read without the word dog.Comment
-
No dude, read what i just said, we cant outlaw cars, they are needed to keep the system running. Guns ARE NOT needed except in war situations. PLEASE dude, think for a minute.Originally posted by frippeno
Blame it on guns if you want to, but keep in mind an idiot can kill with a bottle of bleach.
I'm amused at all the people coming out blaming guns. 42,000 people die in car crashes every year. Should we outlaw cars?
The guy shot into the brush? No gun would be that stupid, only a dumb mother fucking human being, of which there are millions.
And yes, guns have as much a right to exist as any tool.Comment
-
I was responding to your blantantly obvious statement. Your surely are not now taking the position ("guns are not needed") that because something is not needed one should not have it?Originally posted by Battuss
Altho youre not my favourite gfy'er you are not stupid. Please dont place yourself next to jenny in the stupidness charts.
Everybody knows guns are not needed (except in war) but cars, trains, agriculture etc is our world, its our work, its something we need. We couldnt live witouth it out. Guns dont belong in that group. And i know you know that but for some reason prefer to act stupid.
Many people do not "need" cars but own several.When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
Thanks, that really means something coming out of your mouth.Originally posted by SleazyDream
you're right.
I'll reword.
you're a COMPLETE AND TOTAL FUCKING IDIOT
Great arguments! Keep it up oh smart one.Comment
-
So what if it is easier or more efficient to use a gun than a claw hammer? Would you rather see the mob going around jamming cell phones with 9-1-1 dialed on them already down their victims throats until they suffocated?Originally posted by mule
The difference is that pulling a trigger is easy. It's much easier to shoot someone than to knock their brains out with a bat, or strangle them, or stab them. Not only physically easier, but (especially) psychologically.Comment
-
shows what happens when they legalize hashishOriginally posted by Battuss
I dont want to sound like an asshole but they are obviously are NOT fine. And this guy just proved it once again. This is far from the first time something like this happened.
A gun is a gun, doesnt matter for what purpose it was bought.Comment
-
I understand your point, I really do. But my point is that there are MANY things we could outlaw to save lives. Just because YOU enjoy those things, or they make YOUR life easier, you don't want them outlawed.Originally posted by Battuss
If your country wouldnt have allowed guns in the first place you would have a couple of 100.000 accidents a year less. Do you know what i mean?Comment
-
Hmmmm.....I see what you're trying to say, but ...Originally posted by Battuss
Tala i see where you coming from and you are pointing out a problem. The problem is guns were legal in your country in the first place. Making them illegal might have a strange effect and mabye even a wrong effect. (It would still lower the amount of deads by guns tho) If your country wouldnt have allowed guns in the first place you would have a couple of 100.000 accidents a year less. Do you know what i mean?
If guns were illegal, then only criminals would own guns. They don't give a damn about whether or not guns are legal. All they care about is getting what they want and by any means available.
Guns are not difficult to manufacture. You don't even have to have metal to do it. You can make a "gun" of sorts (ever heard of a the potato cannon?) with some PVC pipe and gunpowder.
There is no preventing guns from being available. If they're illegal, criminals will just manufacture their own or smuggle them in from somewhere else.
As far as never having made them legal in the first place, I'm sorry, but I really doubt that it would have changed much. One way or another, someone would have had a gun. It's the cookie jar syndrome. If it's not to be had, naturally we want it.
What is the military supposed to use if not guns? Would we be throwing rocks at each other, or just screaming taunts back and forth?
Scenes from Monty Python come to mind....
ICQ: 11120676 | Google: mindcrime | Skype: suitemindcrime|E-Mail: mindcrime AT gmail.com|PR girl with great writing skills for hire!!!! Contact me to work for YOU!|TECHIEMEDIA? 24/7 support from some of the best techs in the biz. Tell Jim that I sent you.Comment
-
Bv, thats the problem. Here in Holland guns are illegal and a guy robbing your house with a gun in his hand is rare, very rare.Originally posted by BV
BTW, I don't agree with your theory: Even if no one had guns (even criminals) then it would be too easy for thugs to pick on the elderly and women.
What if a couple of thugs broke into your grandmothers house, or your own house while you were away, wouldn't you want your wife or paramour to be able to protect themself and to have something to EQUALIZE the situation?
So we dont need a gun to defend ourself. Once again, its the fact that guns are legal that is the problem in the first place. You know he might have a gun so you also want a gun.Comment
-
I can outrun a phone, but not a bullet, so yesOriginally posted by Buff
So what if it is easier or more efficient to use a gun than a claw hammer? Would you rather see the mob going around jamming cell phones with 9-1-1 dialed on them already down their victims throats until they suffocated?Converting like a mofoComment
-
http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...hoots+intruder
woman shoots intruder
9690 google results, I'm sure there are a few good reasons in there why guns for "self defense" should be kept legal.Comment
-
Dude, didnt you see the stats i posted on the other page. Look at the difference between a country where its legal and where its no legal. Dont fool yourself. Give it a 1 min look and you'll see that you are wrong.Originally posted by Tala
As far as never having made them legal in the first place, I'm sorry, but I really doubt that it would have changed much. One way or another, someone would have had a gun. It's the cookie jar syndrome. If it's not to be had, naturally we want it.
What is the military supposed to use if not guns? Would we be
Ofcourse you are so used to guns because everyone and his brother has one and if they would ban guns tomorrow in the states the country would still have tons of illegal guns.
But look at a country where guns were never legal in the first place, those stats dont like dude. You can think all you want be the stats show something very different.Comment
-
I, like the majority of Americans, prefer to have guns and all of the risks which surround their availability than not to have guns.
Why? What is worth that huge cost in terms of lives lost?
I want to be able to put a bullet in someone who deserves it, be it politician, criminal, child molester, invading soldier, rabbid dog, or a very wealthy old relative who just refuses to die.Comment
-
no better than comparing handgun deaths to car accidents.Originally posted by Battuss
Thanks, that really means something coming out of your mouth.
Great arguments! Keep it up oh smart one.
idiotThis dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Now read without the word dog.Comment
-
YESSSSSSSSSSS ofcourse i already answered this.Originally posted by BV
http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...hoots+intruder
woman shoots intruder
9690 google results, I'm sure there are a few good reasons in there why guns for "self defense" should be kept legal.
Bv, thats the problem. Here in Holland guns are illegal and a guy robbing your house with a gun in his hand is rare, very rare.
So we dont need a gun to defend ourself. Once again, its the fact that guns are legal that is the problem in the first place. You know he might have a gun so you also want a gun.Comment
-
LOL, that's just to attract the tourists. The majority of the clientele of coffeeshops is definitely not DutchOriginally posted by baddog
shows what happens when they legalize hashish
Converting like a mofoComment
-
Huh? Who are you talking to, i was the one saying that people who compare guns to car accidents are idiots.Originally posted by SleazyDream
no better than comparing handgun deaths to car accidents.
idiot
We all know you cant write but i guess i just found out you cant read as well.Comment
-
there are places where gun ownership is required? really?Originally posted by Tala
In the cities and towns throughout the US where it is required for each family to own a gun of some sort, the crime rate has dropped significantly . . .. .
In many states of the United States, cars kill more people annually than guns.
and I would venture that every state has more death due to car wrecks than handgunsComment
-
Lets not got there, its something they will never understand.Originally posted by mule
LOL, that's just to attract the tourists. The majority of the clientele of coffeeshops is definitely not Dutch
We all smoke pot in Holland while wearing our clogs. I was waiting for a comment like this. Its pathetic, lets ignore it.Comment
-
Originally posted by Battuss
Bv, thats the problem. Here in Holland guns are illegal and a guy robbing your house with a gun in his hand is rare, very rare.
So we dont need a gun to defend ourself. Once again, its the fact that guns are legal that is the problem in the first place. You know he might have a gun so you also want a gun.
You are missing my point here Bat, your mom, or wife can not defend herself against a big mean criminal with a knife or club can she? most could not anyways......
..... a .357 in hand would even the odds though.Comment
-
Well...maybe you are.Originally posted by theking
I was responding to your blantantly obvious statement. Your surely are not now taking the position ("guns are not needed") that because something is not needed one should not have it?
Many people do not "need" cars but own several.When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
Ok we had 10 people saying now there are more people dying because of car accidents than gun accidents.
Whats next, someone whos gonna say more people die because of a huge earthquake than of guns???
Fuck this makes me so tired. I already said it ten times now. Cars is something we need in this world, guns are not.
Same with knives, same with windows you can fall out of, same with tootpicks you can use to stab someones eye out.
Please stop comparing car accidents with having guns. Its sooooooooooooo non related.Last edited by Dirty F; 01-19-2004, 12:00 PM.Comment
-
So, even in wonderful Holland where guns are illegal, the criminals still have them if they want them? Hmmm....makes ya' wonder.Originally posted by Battuss
Here in Holland guns are illegal and a guy robbing your house with a gun in his hand is rare, very rare.
Comment
-
Exactly! Good point! This is why the robber will enter the house with a gun. This is why the person who didnt have a gun before now will buy a gun because he knows the robber will have a gun...etc.Originally posted by BV
You are missing my point here Bat, your mom, or wife can not defend herself against a big mean criminal with a knife or club can she? most could not anyways......
..... a .357 in hand would even the odds though.Comment
-
So, you say people cannot live without cars? It happened for many 100's of years but, whatever.
How about if the law is changed so that all cars are made will roll bars, no radios (which distract people), and no car can go over 40 mph. Would that be ok with you since it would save a few lives?Comment
-
Comment