Who the fuck made you judge and jury ?
-
my question as wellSIG TOO BIG -
100 BIATCH!
Edit...Damn you AMP!
Comment
-
ahahahah your late!
btw you coming to montreal?
Comment
-
I was planning on it but now I am not so sure.Originally posted by asuna
ahahahah your late!
btw you coming to montreal?
50/50 chance of it.Comment
-
Why not?Originally posted by AaronM
I was planning on it but now I am not so sure.
50/50 chance of it.Comment
-
Aaron M
You know the thing that's funny is I can't seem to find anywhere on your site and research http://www.ultimatefeeds.com Funny how you wouldn't list this site. Hmmmmm wonder who owns it. You fucking suck ass
ok you mindless twit where is www.deeporalgirls.com and the rest that you left out from http://adult-contentprovider.com
You went about this wrong, a simple email with a heads up would have a worked. Maybe spend more time doing research and less time eating and you will be as thorough as you want all of us to be.
Promote Longz - Highest Paying Pill Sponsor Now Offering a DVD!Comment
-
Great Post Aaron.
Industry Hall Of Fame Legend Mike Jones
Bow to the Power - Still BP4L
http://gfyawards.com/hall-of-fame
Learn about it kids.Comment
-
Aaron, super job! You've obviously put a lot of work into this and it's of great benefit to everybody who buys content.Comment
-
Hye Aaron, your not going to post Manny's content company?Originally posted by Mike33
Aaron, super job! You've obviously put a lot of work into this and it's of great benefit to everybody who buys content.
Comment
-
I am curious to know how many of the content brokers out there have actually *seen* any of the custodian of records information from the producers they represent.
It is great that they give the name and address of the producer... but what are they doing to verify that information?
Does the broker need copies of all releases and IDs to be fully compliant? .... or can he just pass the responsibility down to the producer?... or worse yet, the producer's agent...
Does anyone know the U.S. law on this?SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.Comment
-
So Aaron !
Check out my info site ( bottom ) hope that's to your liking.
"kinda"...
GlamourGirls...HQ 2257 Compliant Glamour Photo and Video Content, for Web - Mobile and TV !!
Profiles: XBIZ - AdultWhosWho | ICQ 179004915Comment
-
Unless I overlooked something, David Lace's Title 18 info is only accessible after you log in to their site, but you've got them listed as compliant.
2257 has to be prominently displayed on the website...which means it must be readily available without registering or logging in, correct?
So am I on crack or what?Comment
-
danm 2257Compliant.com is taken.. would of been a great resource site..Comment
-
My content provider stole my wife, my dog, and my truck. Can't trust 'em, but he did have his 2257. Bastard.- Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com
- For Sale: Obscenity.com
Comment
-
just wanted to post on page 3.
Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?
Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com -
recent work - About meComment
-
Fuck off cry baby.Originally posted by RottenPug
Aaron M
You know the thing that's funny is I can't seem to find anywhere on your site and research http://www.ultimatefeeds.com Funny how you wouldn't list this site. Hmmmmm wonder who owns it. You fucking suck ass
ok you mindless twit where is www.deeporalgirls.com and the rest that you left out from http://adult-contentprovider.com
You went about this wrong, a simple email with a heads up would have a worked. Maybe spend more time doing research and less time eating and you will be as thorough as you want all of us to be.
Did you fix your site yet?Comment
-
saluteOriginally posted by Fletch XXX
just wanted to post on page 3.
Comment
-
by fix, do you mean add more exit consoles?Originally posted by AaronM
Fuck off cry baby.
Did you fix your site yet?Comment
-
Originally posted by Fletch XXX
just wanted to post on page 3.
we'll miss you our friend. RIPComment
-
BUSTED! Aaron are you choosing favorites?Originally posted by The Other Sweetie
Unless I overlooked something, David Lace's Title 18 info is only accessible after you log in to their site, but you've got them listed as compliant.
2257 has to be prominently displayed on the website...which means it must be readily available without registering or logging in, correct?
So am I on crack or what?
edit: why isnt matrix content on the list?Comment
-
Originally posted by quiet
let's get as many glugg glugg's quoted here
Comment
-
hey Aaron, fix the link to http://www.adult-contentprovider.com on your page!
lol, and it took me almost to the end of this thread to realize that was the list from my site
Comment
-
Don't forget to label FalconFoto as an illegal content provider too. Gail will be so pleased she may even call you personally.- Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com
- For Sale: Obscenity.com
Comment
-
edit2: oh wait matrix is. sorryOriginally posted by ry0t
BUSTED! Aaron are you choosing favorites?
edit: why isnt matrix content on the list?Comment
-
LOL.Originally posted by MichaelAncher
So Aaron !
Check out my info site ( bottom ) hope that's to your liking.
"kinda"...
Taken care of.
Comment
-
Matrix is on the page.Originally posted by ry0t
BUSTED! Aaron are you choosing favorites?
edit: why isnt matrix content on the list?
As for David Lace...I actually chatted with David a little while I was making this list. The fact is that the info is well displayed in his site. As mentioned before...I am not being that picky.Comment
-
So.. manny's site will NOT be posted?Comment
-
Who the fuck is Manny?Originally posted by asuna
So.. manny's site will NOT be posted?Comment
-
Glad to see I'm on the list and 2257 compliant!
Cheers!Comment
-
AaronM or others...
I have a question. I have this posted on an AVS site.
All girls herein are 18 years of age or older.
By entering this site you swear that you are of legal age in your area to view adult material and that you wish to view such material.
Records required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2257 are held by the Webmaster of this site or the sponsors of this site.
I do not know if all sponsors are compliant. They say they are but I do not know this for a fact. So am I protecting myself with the disclaimer or not? If not what do I need to do to protect myself?When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
just be sure to have the correct info about the 2257 info of the content providers. The disclaimer protect you I thinkOriginally posted by theking
AaronM or others...
I have a question. I have this posted on an AVS site.
All girls herein are 18 years of age or older.
By entering this site you swear that you are of legal age in your area to view adult material and that you wish to view such material.
Records required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2257 are held by the Webmaster of this site or the sponsors of this site.
I do not know if all sponsors are compliant. They say they are but I do not know this for a fact. So am I protecting myself with the disclaimer or not? If not what do I need to do to protect myself?
Comment
-
Webmasters need to get informed too.. THey trust that their content provider is covering their ass and doing things legally. But unfortunately a lot of people don't even know where to start.Originally posted by basschick
i guess they'd rather find out from a REAL judge and jury
but the webmasters that trust their content provider's word that the content is legal deserve better. why don't web content producers simply put a link to their custodian of records info on their main page? i don't get it....
It's blind faith. Loyalty is good, but if you don't watch your own ass, nobody else is going to watch it for you, that's for sure. They can say they will, they might even intend to.. but it's always best to be armed with information. That way nothing can catch you by surprise. If more WEBMASTERS were a little more "paranoid" about 2257 compliance, more content providers would act accordingly. It's a vicious circle, really. Too many people coming into the biz with bright ideas and no real INFORMATION. They work on whim and conjecture, but don't bother to hunt up the facts. Aaron is giving a great big reality check and probably scared the shit out of a lot of people today, but better he does things this way here than them learning the hard way behind bars as Bubba's bitch.Comment
-
A broker should not only confirm that these records exist, but it's a VERY good idea to keep them on file as well as confirmation of this fact. We require full documentation for every content set we broker for other producers in an unaltered state. We will provide altered (for model's protection) documentation for webmasters if requested. However, as I say, I know we confirm this information and keep records on hand, I would assume most otehr brokers who are concerned with full compliance would do so as well.Originally posted by jcnlv
I am curious to know how many of the content brokers out there have actually *seen* any of the custodian of records information from the producers they represent.
It is great that they give the name and address of the producer... but what are they doing to verify that information?
Does the broker need copies of all releases and IDs to be fully compliant? .... or can he just pass the responsibility down to the producer?... or worse yet, the producer's agent...
Does anyone know the U.S. law on this?Comment
-
hey Aaron what a great idea!
thanks for pointing out that our sister site (Fantasy Modeling) was not in compliance. Its been updated and can viewed here http://www.fantasymodeling.com/2257.html and this page is accessible from our home (enter page) http://www.fantasymodeling.comComment
-
Originally posted by LadyMischief
Webmasters need to get informed too.. THey trust that their content provider is covering their ass and doing things legally. But unfortunately a lot of people don't even know where to start.
So remind me again why he didn't simply post explicit rules that each webmaster should LOOK for when buying content? Or post a complimentary thread advising adult content providers on the most common simple violations of 2257 so they could update their sites if they so chose? As Ralph Nader can attest, it's very difficult to make a difference standing out in front of huge corporate offices with picket signs. It is far easier to educate the consumer. However if Ralph Nader wrote Unsafe At Any Speed while he sat on the board of Ford Motor Co. he would have been laughed off the public stage. Sadly, adult webmasters are simply that gullible.
Buy Aaron's content! He was the one who took the huge and risky step to help purify the industry by pointing out missing names and links on his competitors' websites! And all you content providers, make sure you become Aaron's friend so he will notify you before his next 'crusade' (or simply forget to put you on the list.)Comment
-
Do you honestly think that if it was presented as ANYTHING but a swift kick in the ass, half the people who ARE doing something would have even bothered? Most people aren't that big on subtlety. Sure, Aaron was a little tactless.. but guess what.. the law isnt' so tactful either. Everyone is so busy bitching about Aaron being "mean" that they seem to forget that he's doing them a HUGE favor, and nobody asked him to do it. He's doing it for the general betterment of the industry as a whole, and I for one applaud it. What do you want him to say? "Pardon me, but you might want to read my little list here, and umm.. could you please be nice and not make all of us suffer for your laziness?" Hell with that.Originally posted by mpegposter
So remind me again why he didn't simply post explicit rules that each webmaster should LOOK for when buying content? Or post a complimentary thread advising adult content providers on the most common simple violations of 2257 so they could update their sites if they so chose? As Ralph Nader can attest, it's very difficult to make a difference standing out in front of huge corporate offices with picket signs. It is far easier to educate the consumer. However if Ralph Nader wrote Unsafe At Any Speed while he sat on the board of Ford Motor Co. he would have been laughed off the public stage. Sadly, adult webmasters are simply that gullible.
Buy Aaron's content! He was the one who took the huge and risky step to help purify the industry by pointing out missing names and links on his competitors' websites! And all you content providers, make sure you become Aaron's friend so he will notify you before his next 'crusade' (or simply forget to put you on the list.)
Aaron
Comment
-
I agree. It is an important service.
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
Thanks for the support, Dan. I have updated that listing as well.Originally posted by fantasycontent
hey Aaron what a great idea!
thanks for pointing out that our sister site (Fantasy Modeling) was not in compliance. Its been updated and can viewed here http://www.fantasymodeling.com/2257.html and this page is accessible from our home (enter page) http://www.fantasymodeling.com
Comment
-
Aaron,
I use some of the free content from several of my providers. How do I list them on my 2257 page?? Or can I link to their 2257 pages??
Sorry for the stupid questions..PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic
AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!Comment
-
Thanks Bro and anytime!!Originally posted by AaronM
Thanks for the support, Dan. I have updated that listing as well.
Comment
-
good work aaronComment
-
Well, I am currently working on this 2257 page for all of the PIBCash sites. I have not had it reviewed by any attorney's yet but I am pretty sure it is safe.Originally posted by pornguy
Aaron,
I use some of the free content from several of my providers. How do I list them on my 2257 page?? Or can I link to their 2257 pages??
Sorry for the stupid questions..
This may be a good option for you. Create one page with all of your providers and simply link it to your sites or galleries. In the case of sponsor content, talk to your sponsor and see what they suggest.
http://www.tonifreeland.com/2257.htm
It would not hurt for you to spend a little and get a paid consultation with an Internet attorney. Same goes for pretty much anybody in this business. Not everybody can afford to drop a few grand for a retainer but a couple hundred may keep you out of hot water.
Edit: I know the Isamar provider is missing some info. That is why this page is not live for all of our sites yet.Last edited by AaronM; 04-22-2003, 07:48 PM.Comment
-
We require copies of all documents for items we sell. I believe Web-Legal has started to do this too for anyone non-US based. Not sure about any other brokers.Originally posted by jcnlv
I am curious to know how many of the content brokers out there have actually *seen* any of the custodian of records information from the producers they represent.
It is great that they give the name and address of the producer... but what are they doing to verify that information?
Does the broker need copies of all releases and IDs to be fully compliant? .... or can he just pass the responsibility down to the producer?... or worse yet, the producer's agent...
Does anyone know the U.S. law on this?Free agentComment
-
So you're actually the custodian for every photo? Try again.Originally posted by theking
AaronM or others...
I have a question. I have this posted on an AVS site.
All girls herein are 18 years of age or older.
By entering this site you swear that you are of legal age in your area to view adult material and that you wish to view such material.
Records required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2257 are held by the Webmaster of this site or the sponsors of this site.
I do not know if all sponsors are compliant. They say they are but I do not know this for a fact. So am I protecting myself with the disclaimer or not? If not what do I need to do to protect myself?Free agentComment
-
How about checking http://www.amateur-cutie-content.com and http://www.rockbottomcontent.com both good companies by my experience they might as well be on your list.
BradPresident at MojoHost | brad at mojohost dot com | Skype MojoHostBrad
71 industry awards for hosting and professional excellence since 1999
Comment
-
An explanation please?Originally posted by jact
So you're actually the custodian for every photo? Try again.When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
for those content providers that aaron listed you should give him a link back! After all if you are in compliance he has done you a favor by listing your site.
I added your button here http://www.fantasymodeling.com/resources.html
and will get one on http://www.fantasycontent.com tomorrow when my partner is back in the office.Comment
-
Do you hold the unaltered documents for all the photos you're claiming that (YOU) the "webmaster" has on record? No, then stop telling the authorities that you're taking 100% responsibility and simply put the title 18 information up. Why goto jail when all it takes is a cut and paste?Originally posted by theking
An explanation please?Free agentComment
-
Originally posted by Amputate Your Head
oh look... it's the website compliancy police....
Comment
-
NEWSFLASH!Originally posted by jact
Do you hold the unaltered documents for all the photos you're claiming that (YOU) the "webmaster" has on record? No, then stop telling the authorities that you're taking 100% responsibility and simply put the title 18 information up. Why goto jail when all it takes is a cut and paste?
This is GFY...Please stop making sense.
Comment
Comment