and before we get into the usefulness of inspectors and whatnot, where i'm coming from is using tactics that can't be used against us in an anti-western propaganda machine.. Osama masturbates every time a dead Iraqi baby gets shown on Al-jazeera. more recruits. I don't care if we had inspectors in there for the next 10 years, and kept on bombing military targets and suspected weapons sites like we had been UNTIL such a time when even the most pro-UN person could see the inspectors were only a brake on his WMD production, not a solution and we could go in under the cover of UN authority and world wide condemnation of Iraq.
I know it's a pussy way to go about it, but we're dealing with a beehive here.. we can't burn the whole thing, we have to just make sure that the way we go in gets the least bee's pissed as possible to reach our goals.
didn't Stalin kill millions? sorry I won't drag the thread into semantics I just don't gel with the comparison of bush and saddam to churchhill and hitler... - yeah he's no frikkin girl scout. It would just be nice to have taken him and his sons out in that first strike.. every Iraqi civilian killed is 5 more potential terrorists.
we're getting into a semantics argument. i said Saddam is Stalin-esque which implies he's embodies characteristics of Stalin. Doesn't mean he's his equal. Saddam is to Stalin what Mini-me is to Austin Powers.
ICQ: 176050593 / AIM: JerSF2000
"Love is the answer - but while you're waiting for the answer sex raises some pretty good questions."
---------------------------------------------
Hm, is it just possible that taking and holding 70% of a hostile country doesn't leave much time for looking under every rock, searching every bunker and sifting through every sand dune? Apply a little critical thought before you make a statement like that. The whole of Iraq, top to bottom, above and below ground, is a lot of area to search. It could take years to comb the entire country when you consider Saddam's penchant for hiding thing in civilian buildings as well as military. We've been there how long?
SpaceAce
Im just wondering when your going to update your IRAQ BODY COUNT signature to reflect the real figures. And in a couple of weeks I will be doing the maths. That is subtracting the number of american casualties from the number of iraqi casualties and having a positive number in the thousands remaining. And iraq didnt bomb the trade center you stupid fuck.
we're getting into a semantics argument. i said Saddam is Stalin-esque which implies he's embodies characteristics of Stalin. Doesn't mean he's his equal. Saddam is to Stalin what Mini-me is to Austin Powers.
Ja. it's also strange because he admired the west and people like Churchhill and aspired to be like them.
Very different Hitler conquered most of Europe. He was a real threat to us, they didnt go in for the jews no one believed it at the time. He was getting too powerful, Saddam is a pityful piece of shit he has nothing.Also there is a very very good chance he is dead but they are stilling fighting pretty hard. So maybe they dont want us to save them.
My understanding is Saddam wanted to capture Kuwait [1991] for their wealth and then conquer the rest of the middle east.
Either that or fear the wrath of these kids 20 years from now when they grow up and are pissed off as hell at the US. Best to just eliminate the problem now.
Im just wondering when your going to update your IRAQ BODY COUNT signature to reflect the real figures. And in a couple of weeks I will be doing the maths. That is subtracting the number of american casualties from the number of iraqi casualties and having a positive number in the thousands remaining. And iraq didnt bomb the trade center you stupid fuck.
"So this Hitler guy is killing millions of people? So what the fuck are supposed to do? Like going to war with this crazy mo-fo is going to stop him? Bombing Germany is going to do shit? Fuck no. We should just kick back, smoke a blunt and not give a fuck."
- Martin
Long term, Iraq will be better off.
LOL, are you saying that the US got into WWII because of Hitler? The US was kicking back, smoking blunts and not giving a fuck until Pearl Harbour.
Ok, I didn't read this thread, but I'm still going to give my opinion. Stanton, you gay spamming piece of shit, there is no such thing as a "Pro war" person. No one wants war. The thing is, some people realize that acting "cool" by giving the piece sign, marching in protest, and claming this is anything like Vietnam isn't going to help the millions of innocent people killed by Sadam Hussien. Wake up, grow up, and shut the fuck up.
Yea, with the help of the CIA overthrowing the previous Iraqi government in the 60's. Headed by, you guessed it, Bush Sr.
Saddam's cousin was in power for 12 years, during this period of time Saddam worked for his cousin and was basically his cousins hitman, when his cousin died, Saddam took control. The CIA had nothing to do with this exchange of power.
LOL, are you saying that the US got into WWII because of Hitler? The US was kicking back, smoking blunts and not giving a fuck until Pearl Harbour.
Misinformation. The USA did give a fuck and were supplying the Soviets and Britain with military aid almost from the very beginning and would have eventually committed troops even without an attack by the Japanese. Roosevelt ran for the Presidency on a platform of not engaging in Europe and that is the primary reason for not committing troops from the get go, although he wanted to committ troops long before he did.
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
Misinformation. The USA did give a fuck and were supplying the Soviets and Britain with military aid almost from the very beginning and would have eventually committed troops even without an attack by the Japanese. Roosevelt ran for the Presidency on a platform of not engaging in Europe and that is the primary reason for not committing troops from the get go, although he wanted to committ troops long before he did.
I bow to your superior grasp of history and inside information, King Cannonfodder
Originally posted by mule
I bow to your superior grasp of history and inside information, King Cannonfodder
It is all documented history. Roosevelt's four terms of office (he died during his fourth term), particularly the war years, has been one of the most studied Presidency's in US history.
Originally posted by UnseenWorld What you don't show:
400,000 children starving to death in Iraq in the last 10 years while Saddam builds himself lavish palaces all over the country.
Genocidal gasing of Kurds.
Terror and death squads.
And here's a good one if you're concerned about the children: The Fedayeen Saddam will go into a village, pick out some likely targets (malcontents, ethnic outsiders, etc.), gather the village around MAKING SURE THE CHILDREN ARE IN THE FRONT OF THE CROWD, and then torture and/or execute the victims to put fear of the government in the kids early on.
Crimes against women. The Fedayeen Saddam have, for example, beheaded and cut the tongues out of women for minor and sometimes imagined or trumped up "crimes."
You can't have a war without casualties, but ten years from now without Saddam will probably result in fewer casualties than ten years with him.
Originally posted by Martin Don't worry they'll still pissed off at the US even after they remove Saddam.. Remember you put him there..
Uhh..actually....he put HIMSELF there. I posted this before and will do so again...
Saddam grew up relatively poor in a small village in north-central Iraq. Well-read and tough.
Late 1950's: He joined the Baath Socialist Party, their goal is to rebuild the entire Arab region and improve life for all. Saddam fits in well being well read and open-minded.. he's a born leader.
1968 - Baath Party seizes control of government in Iraq, Saddam becomes the power behind the Revolutionary Command council. Through the 70's he spends his time as the Vice Chairman of the council, orchistrates a nation-wide literacy project, builds schools, roads, public housing, and hospitals.
He gets tired of having to share power with the council, decides to take some steps... culminating on July 22, 1979. He invites council members and party members to a Baghdad conference hall. Wearing his military uniform he comes in claiming there's been a betrayal, a Syrian Plot. Muhyi Abd al-Hussein Mashhadi, council secretary-general shows up and confesses involvement. He'd been tortured and started naming names. 60 "traitors" are detained. 22 of those singled out were executed (their mouths were taped shut so they wouldn't yell in front of the firing squad). Videotapes of the event were circulated and Saddam was leader.
Between 1981-1982 over 3000 Iraqis were executed with little more excuse than Saddam's word.
Another example of Saddam's "personality". Lt.-Gen. Omar al-Hazzaa was overheard speaking badly of Saddam in 1990. Not only was he sentanced to execution, but his tongue was cut out prior to his death. His son was also executed, and Saddam had his home bulldozed, leaving his wife and the rest of his children homeless.
Saddam has made it manditory that every Iraqi official must read a 19-volume official biography of Saddam. He's very vain, petty, but well-read. One of his favorite historical figures is Winston Churchill.
he should be killed, but even mentioning him in the same sentence as Hitler is a bit much. Saddam is spacedog compared to Hitler. Saddam is a tinpot dictator in the middle of nowhere, a threat only to his own people and one or two countries that 99% of America doesn't care about unless they're told to by the tv, or their taxes are going toward killing them.
Yeah, running around with THIS shit... Do you feel comfortable knowing he has it? He DECLARED IT!
Anthrax: Causes fever, septic shock, difficulty breathing, death in 24-72 hours. He declared 85,000 litres of it.
BOtulinum Toxin (a form of botulism): Causes blurred vision, difficulty swallowing, paralysis, respiratory failure, death in as few as 24 hours. He declared 380,000 litres of it.
Aflatoxin: Causes hemmorrhage, convulsions, coma, liver cancer, death. He declared 2,200 litres of it.
Gas Gangrene: Causes tissue death, shock, kidney failure, coma, often death, is painful. He declared 3,400 litres of it.
VX Nerve gas: Disrupts nervous system, causes convulsions, respiratory paralysis, death. He declared 4 tonnes of it (intelligence suggests he has over 200 tonnes).
Sarin Gas: Attacks nervous system, paralyzes muscles used for breathing, can cause death within minutes. He declared 100-150 tonnes of it (intelligence estimates he has up to 350 tonnes)
Mustard Gas: As a liquid, it causes skin and eye burns and blisters. As an inhalent, it can cause long term respiratory disease and cancer. He claimed 500-600 tonnes of it, intelligence suggests he has upward of 800 tonnes of it.
I personally don't feel so comfortable with him potentially giving this stuff to terrorists, or using it himself. Ra Ra for the Coalition, thanks.
As long as there are humans running this planet, there will always be atrocities, injustices, mass killings, starvation, torture, war and all the other hideous things in life. We are the worst of the predators in the animal kingdom. Nothing comes closes to the things we do to each other. Nothing. . . .
400,000 children starving to death in Iraq in the last 10 years while Saddam builds himself lavish palaces all over the country.
Genocidal gasing of Kurds.
Terror and death squads.
And here's a good one if you're concerned about the children: The Fedayeen Saddam will go into a village, pick out some likely targets (malcontents, ethnic outsiders, etc.), gather the village around MAKING SURE THE CHILDREN ARE IN THE FRONT OF THE CROWD, and then torture and/or execute the victims to put fear of the government in the kids early on.
Crimes against women. The Fedayeen Saddam have, for example, beheaded and cut the tongues out of women for minor and sometimes imagined or trumped up "crimes."
You can't have a war without casualties, but ten years from now without Saddam will probably result in fewer casualties than ten years with him.
Well said. For all you liberals and bleeding hearts,
Well over 100 Billion will be spent for this campaign.
Thousands of people will die on both sides.
But...
We didn't want to commit to 10 Billion over a number of years to find a cure for aids which would save lives!
I'm not against killing folks when necassary and I am all for assasination of random leaders. Really, pick one, any one, I'm all for it.
The way we are spending money on this is stupid. If we really wanted to fix the situation it only would have cost maybe 20 for the pack of bullets to plug into Saddam's body. Why are we acting like this entire 250,000 soldier campaign was necassary. It's 2003 for cryin out loud! There's better ways to do this. Are you telling me we've trained special forces for 100 years and have billions spent yearly on the CIA and we can't assasinate a fucking towelhead?
If anyone actually believes half of what is being fed to us they need their brains examined. There's more going on here. I don't know what, you don't know what, so let's not even pretend either of us really has the answers ok.
I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade...
Comment