I've recently found http://www.aljazeera.net/news/arabic/2003/3/3-22-26.htm and was shocked. Innocent people die in thie wrong war.
The result of this wrong war
Collapse
X
-
yes it is horrible that innocent people get hurt and killed in war.
Saddam Hussein is responsible for those deaths, the blood is on his hands, but he has slaughtered thousands and thousands before. This war will save 1,000 times the lives that are lost in this war.
The U.S. is beginning to pummel the Republican Guard. With any luck this war will be over in a month or two and no more bombs.
The Iraqi people are beginning to understand that the Coalition really is there to liberate them from Hussein.
Of course they are also there for the oil
I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!Comment
-
-
and of course, latest estimates by the Red Cross and other organizations are that so far, the leading cause of deaths in Baghdad since the war started are.....
Iraqi anti air munitions falling back down to the groundComment
-
It's getting very tempting to start an ogrish-like site.Originally posted by Yahook
I've recently found http://www.aljazeera.net/news/arabic/2003/3/3-22-26.htm and was shocked. Innocent people die in thie wrong war./(bb|[^b]{2})/Comment
-
From the reports I've been hearing and seeing, this is very true. Civilians are leading soldiers to Baath offices and also giving quite a bit of information. The coalition is also considering arming civilians (with recovered weapons) to help fight, but only after more trust has been gained.Originally posted by Mutt
The Iraqi people are beginning to understand that the Coalition really is there to liberate them from Hussein.
Looks like they're making some progress in Southern Iraq. Cool stuff.PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price!
sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144Comment
-
something on the news this mornig about the US recruiting Iraqi-Americans to go over there and participate in the rebuilding and liberating of Iraq. They didn't say what they would be doing though.Originally posted by Sly_RJ
From the reports I've been hearing and seeing, this is very true. Civilians are leading soldiers to Baath offices and also giving quite a bit of information. The coalition is also considering arming civilians (with recovered weapons) to help fight, but only after more trust has been gained.
Looks like they're making some progress in Southern Iraq. Cool stuff.
Yeah, good to see the Iraqi civilians believing in us at last. After we left them hanging last time, its no suprise they took some convincingComment
-
Now that's just patheticOriginally posted by Snapper
and of course, latest estimates by the Red Cross and other organizations are that so far, the leading cause of deaths in Baghdad since the war started are.....
Iraqi anti air munitions falling back down to the groundSpam link hereComment
-
I've read that, too.Originally posted by Snapper
something on the news this mornig about the US recruiting Iraqi-Americans to go over there and participate in the rebuilding and liberating of Iraq. They didn't say what they would be doing though.
Remember last week when there were reports flying around that thousands of relocated Iraqi's were coming back into the country to help fight against the coalition? Did you ever hear the rest of that story?
Those Iraqi's were not living in the United States, not Australia, not England, and not even France... those Iraqi's were in Jordan, Syria, Iran, Lebanon and the like trying to find a safe place for their families and also finding jobs. They were still Iraqi's!
Where's the propaganda coming from now?
PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price!
sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144Comment
-
Being a veteran, the bottom line is death occurs in war....it doesn't discriminate against age or gender.....it boils down to my life or theirs regardless of their age or gender.....
They are fuckin fanatics over there.....that regime has no regard for human life much less the quality of life.....
The blood of innocent civilians is on the hands of Sadam and his fucked up followers.....We are what we repeatedly do.-AristotleComment
-
yeah, although there are some fanaticals moving bak in to Iraq to fight along side the RG. Fine by me. I say lets call a cease fir for a week so every Al-Qaeda asshole can fly into baghdad and stand nice and close to the RG divisions. Makes every bomb we drop kill more bad guys.Originally posted by Sly_RJ
I've read that, too.
Remember last week when there were reports flying around that thousands of relocated Iraqi's were coming back into the country to help fight against the coalition? Did you ever hear the rest of that story?
Those Iraqi's were not living in the United States, not Australia, not England, and not even France... those Iraqi's were in Jordan, Syria, Iran, Lebanon and the like trying to find a safe place for their families and also finding jobs. They were still Iraqi's!
Where's the propaganda coming from now?
Comment
-
Not only on the hands of Sadam but on the hands of Bush who started this war for oil. Not Iraqi military forced kill innocent civilians but American bombs kill them. Bush just find a pretense to start this blood war for OIL. Who give him the right to start this war? This is not his country and this is not his problem.The blood of innocent civilians is on the hands of Sadam and his fucked up followers.....
Now many people in different countries show their protest against this blood war for oil.
I understand that opinion of many American people about this war depends much of American TV news channels. But from my side I see that American news channels filter the information - they only show those facts that are benefitial for the Coalition (because it is very important for the Coalition to justify their wrong actions and their crime against the people of Iraq).
Sorry for my bad english - it's not my native language.
________________
HQ Porn Links - webmasters add your sites here ASAPComment
-
Originally posted by Yahook
Not only on the hands of Sadam but on the hands of Bush who started this war for oil. Not Iraqi military forced kill innocent civilians but American bombs kill them. Bush just find a pretense to start this blood war for OIL. Who give him the right to start this war? This is not his country and this is not his problem.
Now many people in different countries show their protest against this blood war for oil.
I understand that opinion of many American people about this war depends much of American TV news channels. But from my side I see that American news channels filter the information - they only show those facts that are benefitial for the Coalition (because it is very important for the Coalition to justify their wrong actions and their crime against the people of Iraq).
Sorry for my bad english - it's not my native language.
________________
HQ Porn Links - webmasters add your sites here ASAP
lol YEAH lets just turn our backs and let saddam to continue killing thousands of people for the hella it, i mean, we'd HATE for the world to have such a bad impression of us thinking we're all for oil! we'd rather let people die than projecting such a greedy image!
idiotComment
-
Originally posted by Yahook
Not only on the hands of Sadam but on the hands of Bush who started this war for oil. Not Iraqi military forced kill innocent civilians but American bombs kill them. Bush just find a pretense to start this blood war for OIL. Who give him the right to start this war? This is not his country and this is not his problem.
I can't believe how many people keep repeating this tired old bullshit without checking any facts. Here's a fact for you: the United States gets most of its crude oil from <B>Canada</B> Yes, Canada. Here's another fact: Iraq's oil makes up only about 3% of our imports. Hold on while I try to find specifics...
OK, here:
Canada: 18.9% (2.082 million barrels/day)
...
...
Iraq: 3.3% (366,000 barrels/day)
(Figures as of December 2002)
There is no evidence to support your ludicrous claim. Even if we wanted his oil, we can't have it. We don't have the shipping infrastructure, the refining infrastructure or the raw manpower that would be necessary to cart away all of Saddam's oil. Even if we were to take over Iraq and make it the 51st state, which isn't going to happen, your assertion still wouldn't make anys ense. Saddam has been fucking us and the UN around for over a decade. Oil prices were just as bad or worse during the first Gulf War and we didn't stay to take his oil then. We're not in this for the oil this time, either.
And many more show their support. You hear a lot of negative crap because it makes for better sound bites. Do some research, the United States has a lot of support on this. Not 100%, obviously, but not the 0% some would like you to believe.Originally posted by Yahook
Now many people in different countries show their protest against this blood war for oil.
This is pretty funny. I have noticed that a <B>lot</B> of the anti-American sentiment is coming from Russia and former Soviet Bloc countries. One thing these guys keep saying is how the <I>American</I> media is lying / filtering / misrepresenting. This is really a riot coming from people who got all their news from Pravda until a decade ago.Originally posted by Yahook
I understand that opinion of many American people about this war depends much of American TV news channels. But from my side I see that American news channels filter the information - they only show those facts that are benefitial for the Coalition (because it is very important for the Coalition to justify their wrong actions and their crime against the people of Iraq).
Your English is not bad, but I think your grasp of the situation is pretty weak.Originally posted by Yahook
Sorry for my bad english - it's not my native language.
SpaceAceComment
-
Yawn.
You don't have to "steal" oil for the war to be about oil.
Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life
"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."Comment
-
Is it any wonder that even the dumbest American can succeed on the world stage when the competition are jokers like this fool?Originally posted by Yahook
Not only on the hands of Sadam but on the hands of Bush who started this war for oil. Not Iraqi military forced kill innocent civilians but American bombs kill them. Bush just find a pretense to start this blood war for OIL. Who give him the right to start this war? This is not his country and this is not his problem.
Now many people in different countries show their protest against this blood war for oil.
I understand that opinion of many American people about this war depends much of American TV news channels. But from my side I see that American news channels filter the information - they only show those facts that are benefitial for the Coalition (because it is very important for the Coalition to justify their wrong actions and their crime against the people of Iraq).
Sorry for my bad english - it's not my native language.
I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.Comment
-
sorry dude.. but I can't let this pass - this is so disingenuous.Originally posted by SpaceAce
I can't believe how many people keep repeating this tired old bullshit without checking any facts. Here's a fact for you: the United States gets most of its crude oil from Canada Yes, Canada. Here's another fact: Iraq's oil makes up only about 3% of our imports. Hold on while I try to find specifics...
OK, here:
Canada: 18.9% (2.082 million barrels/day)
...
...
Iraq: 3.3% (366,000 barrels/day)
(Figures as of December 2002)
SpaceAce
one reason America only imports 3.3% of it oil from Iraq?
THEY ARE UNDER SANCTIONS ENFORCED BY THE US! through the UN of course though.
Using a import statisitic has absolutely no bearing on his argument that the war is for oil, I mean if it was for Iraq's oil, wouldn't the whole point be that he wasn't importing enough of it??
And it doesn't change the fact that importing the oil for domestic American use means squat when people are aguing that Bush is "big oil" meaning giving American companies access to the oil is just as significant a factor.
the MUCH more relevant fact is that Iraq has the 2nd largest known oil reserves. If you're going to argue that it's not for oil then argue about the fact that they're second only to Saudi Arabia.
It's like talking about how it's not about oil because their oil production is at "x%" whilst fully knowing that the reason they only produce that amount of oil is that the infrastructure was ruined in the first gulf war and they're only allowed to produce so much.
I just don't see that line of argument convincing anyone because it isn't relevant.Last edited by bhutocracy; 04-02-2003, 04:43 AM.Comment
-
Besides, paying some brown person $2 day to pump oil probably makes it way cheaper than those pinko commie socialists to the north.. all the more profit without half of it going to some canuckistani's universal health coverage.
Comment
-
hahaha, a person is saying this who lives in Belarus, which is not that different from Iraq's regime. Isn't Lukashenko a close friend to SaddamOriginally posted by Yahook
I've recently found http://www.aljazeera.net/news/arabic/2003/3/3-22-26.htm and was shocked. Innocent people die in thie wrong war.Comment
-
Belarus needs to be liberated from its dictator.Originally posted by Yahook
Not only on the hands of Sadam but on the hands of Bush who started this war for oil. Not Iraqi military forced kill innocent civilians but American bombs kill them. Bush just find a pretense to start this blood war for OIL. Who give him the right to start this war? This is not his country and this is not his problem.
Now many people in different countries show their protest against this blood war for oil.
I understand that opinion of many American people about this war depends much of American TV news channels. But from my side I see that American news channels filter the information - they only show those facts that are benefitial for the Coalition (because it is very important for the Coalition to justify their wrong actions and their crime against the people of Iraq).
Sorry for my bad english - it's not my native language.
________________
HQ Porn Links - webmasters add your sites here ASAP
Comment
-
cause its not. Im pretty sure I read somewhere that the oil $$ is going to be thrown back into Iraq's economy to get them back on track.Originally posted by Yahook
Now many people in different countries show their protest against this blood war for oil.
Want to accept Bitcoin (BTC) on your site without any issues? I modestly estimate a 15%-20% boost in conversions.
Projects Like These Cost Big $$$, Please Donate: 112BNRe8WiooVBTqDFSLzjBo6Ve1LunViN

Comment
-
yeah..yeah..yeah
The war is NOT about the oil you fucking idoits..
If we needed the oil bad enough.
It would cost us billions less, just to lift the embargo and US lives would be saved.
Talk about innocent deaths in this war?
Innocent people always die in wars.
Look how many "innocent" people died in WWI, WWII, Korean, Vietnam, and hundreds of others wars. But all died for a good cause, some not.
I guess, in YOUR opinion.
The millions "innocent people" that have died during Saddams regime don't count...eh.??
Did you forget how many millions of "innocent" Iraqi's he and his regime have murdered, gassed, injured doing his 25+ years of power??
Go back to fingering your anus and come back when you have polished up on your english, history and facts.
Then maybe we'll talk to you.
Comment
-
"Same old song" that justifies your illegitimate actions.Originally posted by galleryseek
lol YEAH lets just turn our backs and let saddam to continue killing thousands of people for the hella it, i mean, we'd HATE for the world to have such a bad impression of us thinking we're all for oil! we'd rather let people die than projecting such a greedy image!
idiot
When are the US going into Comgo: 3 000 000 dead civilians at the hands of a miltary dictatorial regime in the past 5 yeard.
Warning: no oil in Congo, only people... Go liberate them, after all your are the peace loving troops....I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
Exactly. I have this feeling those numbers are going to change in favor of Iraq...Originally posted by SpaceAce
I can't believe how many people keep repeating this tired old bullshit without checking any facts. Here's a fact for you: the United States gets most of its crude oil from Canada Yes, Canada. Here's another fact: Iraq's oil makes up only about 3% of our imports. Hold on while I try to find specifics...
OK, here:
Canada: 18.9% (2.082 million barrels/day)
...
...
Iraq: 3.3% (366,000 barrels/day)
SpaceAce
And BTW, if you take away any source of oil, it affects the whole world ( yes, theyre are other countries aside from the US) :
just lately, the strike in Venezuela...
OH yes, he kills his people and cuts tongue ... Scaryfable to tell your kids at night...I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
You are a dumb fuck.Originally posted by Yahook
Not only on the hands of Sadam but on the hands of Bush who started this war for oil. Not Iraqi military forced kill innocent civilians but American bombs kill them. Bush just find a pretense to start this blood war for OIL. Who give him the right to start this war? This is not his country and this is not his problem.
Now many people in different countries show their protest against this blood war for oil.
I understand that opinion of many American people about this war depends much of American TV news channels. But from my side I see that American news channels filter the information - they only show those facts that are benefitial for the Coalition (because it is very important for the Coalition to justify their wrong actions and their crime against the people of Iraq).
Sorry for my bad english - it's not my native language.
It's not about the oil.SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.Comment
-
Isn't it funny? They have doctors to save the lives of the "wounded", but yet think nothing of gassing tens of tousands of people and killing them, and think nothing of killing their own if they refuse to fight.Herschel Savage
Brooklyn, NYComment
-
and Bush is an angel ... right?Originally posted by Mutt
Saddam Hussein is responsible for those deaths, the blood is on his hands
FUCK OFF!The Iraqi people are beginning to understand that the Coalition really is there to liberate them from Hussein.SEO Mogul | ICQ: 163671223Comment
-
let me explain...I can't believe how many people keep repeating this tired old bullshit without checking any facts. Here's a fact for you: the United States gets most of its crude oil from Canada Yes, Canada. Here's another fact: Iraq's oil makes up only about 3% of our imports. Hold on while I try to find specifics...
OK, here:
Canada: 18.9% (2.082 million barrels/day)
...
...
Iraq: 3.3% (366,000 barrels/day)
(Figures as of December 2002)
Saddam's biggest mistake was when he began to sell oil on EURO, exactly on 6 november 2001. It was an act of courage, that time 1$~0.8 EURO (so he lost some BIG money). after that the $ falls.. and falls .. and falls.,. and now 1EURO~0.9USD
that's why he started this war, so the world will keep the USD as the global accepted currency...
SO IT"S ALL ABOUT THE OIL and the articifically maintained USD
read this and convince yourself:
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=118008SEO Mogul | ICQ: 163671223Comment
-
I love it when assclowns trot out a false story and then point to it a week later as their proof.Originally posted by flashfreak
let me explain...
Saddam's biggest mistake was when he began to sell oil on EURO, exactly on 6 november 2001. It was an act of courage, that time 1$~0.8 EURO (so he lost some BIG money). after that the $ falls.. and falls .. and falls.,. and now 1EURO~0.9USD
that's why he started this war, so the world will keep the USD as the global accepted currency...
SO IT"S ALL ABOUT THE OIL and the articifically maintained USD
read this and convince yourself:
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=118008
I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.Comment
-
We were leaving that to the mighty canadians. You know, the ones who didn't want to be used as props *again* in a real war.Originally posted by directfiesta
When are the US going into Comgo: 3 000 000 dead civilians at the hands of a miltary dictatorial regime in the past 5 yeard.
Take your aircraft carriers down to the congo and take charge!
(oh, wait. you don't have aircraft carriers do you?)
well, shit, hop on aircanada, fly over there and save the congo. (oh, wait. aircanada just went bankrupt)
hmmmmm, I guess your impotence could very well explain the bitterness you spend on your betters.
I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.Comment
-
get lost fuckface... have you read that post? do you have solid arguments to deny it? then shut the fuck up and eat the shit CNN feeds you every fuckin' day....Originally posted by 12clicks
I love it when assclowns trot out a false story and then point to it a week later as their proof.
SEO Mogul | ICQ: 163671223Comment
-
Huuummmmm ... Let me think .... What do countries do .......Originally posted by Colin
What is the criteria for a "legitimate" war?
Do they have an organisation.... Huuuum.... I think there is a building in NY....... Hummmmmm, probably to store servers.....
Ohhhhh! Just found it. We make a proposal to a group of countries and we get their approval. Then our war operation is legitimate.... I think it is called UN... not sure tough
Last edited by directfiesta; 04-02-2003, 08:13 AM.I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
Your answer is proof of your idiocy.Originally posted by 12clicks
We were leaving that to the mighty canadians. You know, the ones who didn't want to be used as props *again* in a real war.
Take your aircraft carriers down to the congo and take charge!
(oh, wait. you don't have aircraft carriers do you?)
well, shit, hop on aircanada, fly over there and save the congo. (oh, wait. aircanada just went bankrupt)
hmmmmm, I guess your impotence could very well explain the bitterness you spend on your betters.
WE are not at war and don't want to, and we do not proclaim that we liberate people.
The US does that. so when are you goiing to liberate the population of Congo. After all, you are the one that brings this " liberation shit" in your justification of war....
If you have no intelligent answer, abstain.I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
What makes the UN THE de facto organization that decides the legitimacy or illegitimacy of military action?Originally posted by directfiesta
Huuummmmm ... Let me think .... What do countries do .......
Do they have an organisation.... Huuuum.... I think there is a building in NY....... Hummmmmm, probably to store servers.....
Ohhhhh! Just found it. We make a proposal to a group of countries and we get their approval. Then our war operation is legitimate.... I think it is called UN... not sure tough
If it is, why have so many countries in the UN been involved in military conflicts without it's approval including the US, UK, USSR, and China?
Which conflicts of the literally hundreds since the founding of the UN were legitimate? If there are hundreds of conflicts that occured without UN approval and only a handful that occured with it, doesn't that make the necessity of the UN's approval a sort of silly idea?
Note: there is NO UN resolution AGAINST the current conflict in Iraq. That would make it more illegitimate but it is clearly a matter of degree. The UN attempted to pass a resolution againt the USSR's invasion of Hungary and Russia just vetoed it. They exercised their veto power "legally" and I suppose that made it legitimate. Correct?
There is not much history AT ALL of countries getting PERMISSION from the UN to go to war. Where does this idea of needing international approval attached to a concept of "legitimacy" come from?
skype = "adultdatelink"Comment
-
Originally posted by directfiesta
WE are not at war and don't want to, and we do not proclaim that we liberate people.
Your country flew combat missions in Kosovo.
A war of "liberation" that did not have UN approval.
skype = "adultdatelink"Comment
-
You are the idiot here. Good ole' USA probably killed far more people than any other country.Originally posted by galleryseek
lol YEAH lets just turn our backs and let saddam to continue killing thousands of people for the hella it, i mean, we'd HATE for the world to have such a bad impression of us thinking we're all for oil! we'd rather let people die than projecting such a greedy image!
idiot
And wake the fuck up, there are worse dictators than Saddam. Why isn't Bush "freeing" those people?Promote these REAL amateur sites with Exclusive content:
African Casting | Real Africans | Latina Fuck Tour | African Lesbians
African Bucks Contact: support @ africanbucks.comComment
-
While you're obviously researching, just check out what the US had to say about thatOriginally posted by Colin
The UN attempted to pass a resolution againt the USSR's invasion of Hungary and Russia just vetoed it. They exercised their veto power "legally" and I suppose that made it legitimate.Converting like a mofoComment
-
Good guess. Some are getting more hateful, some less.Originally posted by digi
Its funny how the media here says the iraqi people are getting more and more hateful towards the usa, and us media says the opposite.
conclusion: none of us fucking know.
skype = "adultdatelink"Comment
-
It's well known that Iraq is winning the propoganda war, he sets his own citizens up to be killed.Originally posted by Yahook
I've recently found http://www.aljazeera.net/news/arabic/2003/3/3-22-26.htm and was shocked. Innocent people die in thie wrong war.
He has recently created small military command stations in schools, hospitals and other public places then fires upon our troops trying to force us to return fire, this would of course cause civillian casualties which is what Saddam is hoping for.
These innocent deaths ARE horrible and tragic, but the blood's on Saddams hands, he put them in harms way intentionally.Adult SEO Partners - Full service Adult SEO Agency serving some of the biggest names in the industry.Comment
-
Wake the fuck up.
No matter how fucked up your dictator is, if another country came over to bomb the shit out of your beautifull capital city you would be pissed!Promote these REAL amateur sites with Exclusive content:
African Casting | Real Africans | Latina Fuck Tour | African Lesbians
African Bucks Contact: support @ africanbucks.comComment
-
1. That was off the top off my head. Funny you'd assume that someone would have to research a very important conflict of the 20th century. See Warsaw Pact for why.Originally posted by mule
While you're obviously researching, just check out what the US had to say about that
2. I don't care whether the US thinks something is legitimate or not. I care about whether I do.
3. No shit. People that are opposed to conflict but are unwilling to pay the price or are incapable of stopping it cry to international bodies and claim the acts are illegitimate. The US did it in 1956. You are doing it now.
skype = "adultdatelink"Comment



Comment